Soliman Mostafa
Agricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of Residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Giza 12311, Egypt.
J AOAC Int. 2025 Jan 1;108(1):112-115. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsae080.
Currently, the most popular technique in gas chromatography (GC) is "temperature programming," where the temperature increases from the start of the injection. This leads to faster elution of analytes compared to isothermal methods. However, isothermal methods are considered optimal for separating compounds with similar retention times. Another interesting technique that provides higher resolution is dynamic thermal gradient gas chromatography (TGGC), where separations are achieved as a decreasing thermal gradient. This gradually decreases the positive gas velocity. Nevertheless, it was proven that GC techniques with negative velocity gradients do not improve the resolution of compounds with nearly identical retention times.
Optimizing a new GC approach to combine both the short time from positive temperature ramps programming, and the enhanced separation of the negative ramps of the TGGC, a model under the name of "end column reverse chromatography" (ECRC).
The process simply consists of two steps: the first is a normal positive ramp from the start of the injection, and the second step is a negative thermal ramp at a time that is around the retention time of the first eluting peak. This will decrease the solute velocity almost solely for the second compound, leading to relatively enhanced separation.
The optimized ECRC method increased the resolution of two isomers (trans- and cis-chlordane) from 1 (slightly overlapping) in the case of temperature programming to 2.78 as shown in this study. This comes at the expense of the width and intensity of the peaks, where the intensity decreased about 17 and 12% for cis- and trans-chlordane, and the peak width increased with 37 and 77% for the same compounds, respectively.
ECRC is a novel model for enhanced separation that comes with some drawbacks.
It can be an alternative approach to get a fast GC method with enhanced separation for isomers.
目前,气相色谱法(GC)中最常用的技术是“程序升温”,即从进样开始温度升高。与等温方法相比,这会使分析物的洗脱速度更快。然而,等温方法被认为是分离保留时间相似的化合物的最佳方法。另一种能提供更高分辨率的有趣技术是动态热梯度气相色谱法(TGGC),其分离是通过降低热梯度实现的。这会逐渐降低正向气体流速。然而,已证明具有负速度梯度的GC技术并不能提高保留时间几乎相同的化合物的分辨率。
优化一种新的GC方法,将正向温度梯度程序升温的短时间与TGGC负梯度的增强分离相结合,即一种名为“柱端反向色谱法”(ECRC)的模型。
该过程简单地由两个步骤组成:第一步是从进样开始的正常正向梯度,第二步是在第一个洗脱峰的保留时间左右进行负向热梯度。这几乎只会降低第二种化合物的溶质速度,从而导致相对增强的分离效果。
本研究表明,优化后的ECRC方法将两种异构体(反式和顺式氯丹)的分辨率从程序升温时的1(略有重叠)提高到了2.78。这是以峰宽和峰强度为代价的,其中顺式和反式氯丹的峰强度分别降低了约17%和12%,相同化合物的峰宽分别增加了37%和77%。
ECRC是一种用于增强分离的新模型,但存在一些缺点。
它可以作为一种替代方法,用于获得一种快速GC方法,增强对异构体的分离。