Suppr超能文献

奥妥珠单抗与利妥昔单抗治疗难治性原发性膜性肾病的疗效比较

Obinutuzumab versus rituximab for the treatment of refractory primary membranous nephropathy.

作者信息

Xu Mingyue, Wang Yifeng, Wu Meihe, Chen Ruiying, Zhao Wenqian, Li Mingxin, Hao Chuan-Ming, Xie Qionghong

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025 Apr 28;40(5):978-986. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae230.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rituximab has been shown effective in patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (GC + CTX) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), but the response rates remain limited. Compared with rituximab, obinutuzumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater B-cell depletion capacity. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of obinutuzumab compared with rituximab in treating patients with refractory primary membranous nephropathy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2024, and included adult patients with primary membranous nephropathy who met the following criteria: (i) resistance to GC + CTX and/or CNI regimens, (ii) dependence on CNIs or (iii) relapse within 1 year after CTX discontinuation. The patients subsequently received either obinutuzumab or rituximab. The primary endpoint was treatment response, which was defined as overall remission of nephrotic syndrome with no need for rescue therapy after obinutuzumab versus rituximab treatment. The secondary measures included immunological remission and safety profiles.

RESULTS

Among the 51 participants, 20 received obinutuzumab and 31 received rituximab. The response rate was significantly greater in patients receiving obinutuzumab than in those receiving rituximab (90.0% vs 38.7%, P < .001) during a follow-up period of 24 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-34] months. Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis also revealed the superior effectiveness of obinutuzumab (P < .001). Immunological remission rates were higher in patients receiving obinutuzumab at both 3 months (75.0% vs 20.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (87.5% vs 21.4%, P < .001). The safety profiles of the two treatments were comparable. Among the 19 non-responders treated with rituximab, 10 subsequently received obinutuzumab, and 8 achieved remission during a follow-up period of 20.0 (IQR 18.5-22.3) months.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that obinutuzumab is an effective treatment option for patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to GC + CTX, CNI and rituximab regimens.

摘要

背景

利妥昔单抗已被证明对糖皮质激素联合环磷酰胺(GC + CTX)或钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)治疗无效的原发性膜性肾病患者有效,但缓解率仍然有限。与利妥昔单抗相比,奥妥珠单抗是一种具有更强B细胞清除能力的人源化抗CD20单克隆抗体。本研究旨在探讨奥妥珠单抗与利妥昔单抗相比治疗难治性原发性膜性肾病患者的有效性。

方法

在复旦大学附属华山医院进行了一项回顾性研究,研究时间为2015年1月1日至2024年7月31日,纳入符合以下标准的原发性膜性肾病成年患者:(i)对GC + CTX和/或CNI方案耐药;(ii)依赖CNI;或(iii)CTX停药后1年内复发。患者随后接受奥妥珠单抗或利妥昔单抗治疗。主要终点是治疗反应,定义为奥妥珠单抗与利妥昔单抗治疗后肾病综合征完全缓解且无需挽救治疗。次要指标包括免疫缓解和安全性。

结果

51名参与者中,20名接受奥妥珠单抗治疗,31名接受利妥昔单抗治疗。在24 [四分位间距(IQR)10 - 34]个月的随访期内,接受奥妥珠单抗治疗的患者的缓解率显著高于接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者(90.0%对38.7%,P <.001)。Cox比例风险生存回归分析也显示奥妥珠单抗具有更高的有效性(P <.001)。接受奥妥珠单抗治疗的患者在3个月(75.0%对20.0%,P <.001)和6个月(87.5%对21.4%,P <.001)时的免疫缓解率更高。两种治疗的安全性相当。在19名接受利妥昔单抗治疗无反应的患者中,10名随后接受了奥妥珠单抗治疗,其中8名在20.0(IQR 18.5 - 22.3)个月的随访期内实现缓解。

结论

这项回顾性研究表明,奥妥珠单抗是对GC + CTX、CNI和利妥昔单抗方案难治的原发性膜性肾病患者的一种有效治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验