Bush Nicholas J, Cushnie Adriana K, Sinclair Madison, Ahmed Huda, Schorn Rachel, Xie Tongzhen, Boissoneault Jeff
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;48(12):2341-2351. doi: 10.1111/acer.15465. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
Alcohol is a commonly used substance associated with significant public health consequences. Treatment is often stigmatized and limited with regard to both access and affordability, demonstrating the need for innovations in alcohol treatment. Accelerometer sensors can detect drinking without user input and are widely incorporated into wearable devices, increasing accessibility and affordability.
We compared a distributional and random forest classification approach to detect and evaluate sensor-based drinking data. Data were collected at a local state fair (n = 194), where participants drank water at specified intervals interspersed with confounding behaviors (e.g., touching nose, rubbing forehead, or yawning) while wearing an Android-based smartwatch for 10 min. Participants were randomized to receive one of three drinking container shapes: pint, martini, or wine.
The random forest model achieved an overall testing accuracy of 93% (sensitivity = 0.32; specificity = 0.99; positive predictive value = 0.74). The distributional algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 95% (sensitivity = 0.76; specificity = 0.97; positive predictive value = 0.72). The distributional algorithm had a significantly greater accuracy (t(193) = 7.73, p < 0.001, d = 0.56) and sensitivity (t(193) = 24.5, p < 0.001, d = 1.76). Equivalency testing demonstrated significant equivalency to the ground truth for sip duration (t(193) = 16.92, p < 0.001; t(193) = -9.85, p < 0.001) and between-sip interval (t(193) = 1.72, p = 0.044; t(193) = -3.96, p < 0.001). However, the random forest did not have significant equivalency to the ground truth for between-sip interval (t(193) = 1.98, p = 0.025; t(193) = 0.160, p = 0.564).
Overall, the results indicated that consumer-grade smartwatches can be utilized to detect and measure alcohol use behavior using machine learning and distributional algorithms. This work provides the methodological foundation for future research to analyze the behavioral pharmacology of alcohol use and develop accessible just-in-time clinical interventions.
酒精是一种常用物质,会带来重大的公共卫生后果。治疗往往受到污名化,在可及性和可承受性方面都很有限,这表明酒精治疗需要创新。加速度计传感器无需用户输入即可检测饮酒情况,并且广泛应用于可穿戴设备中,提高了可及性和可承受性。
我们比较了分布算法和随机森林分类方法来检测和评估基于传感器的饮酒数据。数据在当地的州博览会上收集(n = 194),参与者在佩戴基于安卓系统的智能手表10分钟的过程中,以特定间隔喝水,并穿插有混淆行为(如摸鼻子、揉额头或打哈欠)。参与者被随机分配接受三种饮酒容器形状之一:品脱杯、马提尼杯或葡萄酒杯。
随机森林模型的总体测试准确率为93%(灵敏度 = 0.32;特异度 = 0.99;阳性预测值 = 0.74)。分布算法的总体准确率为95%(灵敏度 = 0.76;特异度 = 0.97;阳性预测值 = 0.72)。分布算法具有显著更高的准确率(t(193) = 7.73,p < 0.001,d = 0.56)和灵敏度(t(193) = 24.5,p < 0.001,d = 1.76)。等效性测试表明,对于啜饮持续时间(t(193) = 16.92,p < 0.001;t(193) = -9.85,p < 0.001)和啜饮间隔(t(193) = 1.72,p = 0.044;t(193) = -3.96,p < 0.001),与真实情况具有显著等效性。然而,随机森林对于啜饮间隔与真实情况没有显著等效性(t(193) = 1.98,p = 0.025;t(193) = 0.160,p = 0.564)。
总体而言,结果表明消费级智能手表可用于通过机器学习和分布算法检测和测量酒精使用行为。这项工作为未来研究分析酒精使用的行为药理学以及开发可及的即时临床干预措施提供了方法学基础。