Suppr超能文献

阿兹夫定对比奈玛特韦/利托那韦在奥密克戎变异株感染成年患者中的有效性和安全性:一项北京的回顾性研究。

Effectiveness and safety of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in adult patients infected with COVID-19 omicron strains: a retrospective study in Beijing.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.

Department of Emergency, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):23974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74502-5.

Abstract

The study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against omicron strains of coronavirus disease 2019 infections and determine their comparative effectiveness. This retrospective study included 716 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR group) or azvudine (FNC group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1 November 2022 and 27 February 2023. Patients in the FNC group (n = 304) were younger, exhibited less severe symptoms, started antiviral therapy later, received corticosteroids more frequently, and used tocilizumab less frequently than patients in the NR group (n = 412). Within 28 d of therapy, 40 (9.7%) and 20 (6.6%) deaths were in the NR and FNC groups, respectively. No differences were observed between drugs and mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.5, P = 0.45), clinical improvement (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-1.3, P = 0.38), and clinical progression (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.58-1.8, P = 0.96). More patients in the NR group experienced platelet decline than those in the FNC group (17.6% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.034). This study indicated that the effectiveness and safety of azvudine were comparable to those of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

摘要

本研究旨在评估阿兹夫定与奈玛特韦/利托那韦对比治疗奥密克戎株 COVID-19 感染的临床结局,并确定其相对有效性。本回顾性研究纳入了 2022 年 11 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 27 日期间在北京协和医院接受奈玛特韦/利托那韦(NR 组)或阿兹夫定(FNC 组)治疗的 716 例患者。FNC 组(n=304)患者较年轻,症状较轻,开始抗病毒治疗的时间较晚,更常使用皮质类固醇,较少使用托珠单抗。在治疗的 28 天内,NR 组和 FNC 组的死亡率分别为 9.7%(40/412)和 6.6%(20/304)。两组间药物与死亡率之间无差异(比值比 [OR] 0.78,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.40-1.5,P=0.45),临床改善(OR 0.79,95%CI 0.79-1.3,P=0.38)和临床进展(OR 1.0,95%CI 0.58-1.8,P=0.96)。NR 组较 FNC 组更常出现血小板下降(17.6% vs. 8.9%,P=0.034)。本研究表明,阿兹夫定的有效性和安全性与奈玛特韦/利托那韦相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91c/11473676/42be559fde26/41598_2024_74502_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验