Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 5 Gil 20, Boramae-Road, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):23978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74752-3.
This study was conducted to re-evaluate the utility of subendometrial enhancement (SEE) in assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium. In total, 110 women who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for non-endometrial gynecologic diseases were enrolled in this prospective study. Two radiologists independently assessed the presence or absence of subendometrial enhancement (SEE) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of menstrual status on the detection of SEE. Identified areas of SEE were rated using a 4-point Likert scale to determine their reliability in assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium. SEE was identified in 44.5% (49/110) of cases by radiologist 1 and in 39.1% (43/110) by radiologist 2. A subgroup analysis indicated no significant differences in the detection of SEE based on menstrual status. The identified areas of SEE were deemed reliable for assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium in 24.5% (12/49) of the cases evaluated by radiologist 1 and in 32.6% (14/43) of those evaluated by radiologist 2. Among the 110 women studied, reliable areas of SEE for assessing the interface between the endometrium and myometrium were observed in 10.9% (n = 12) by radiologist 1 and 12.7% (n = 14) by radiologist 2. The evaluation of SEE using dynamic CE MRI may be limited in its ability to assess the interface between the endometrium and myometrium.
本研究旨在重新评估子宫下段增强(SEE)在评估子宫内膜和子宫肌层界面中的作用。共有 110 名因非子宫内膜妇科疾病而行盆腔磁共振成像(MRI)检查的女性参与了这项前瞻性研究。两名放射科医生独立评估动态对比增强(CE)MRI 上是否存在子宫下段增强(SEE)。进行了亚组分析,以评估月经状态对检测 SEE 的影响。使用 4 分 Likert 量表对识别出的 SEE 区域进行评分,以确定其在评估子宫内膜和子宫肌层界面方面的可靠性。放射科医生 1 识别出 44.5%(49/110)的病例存在 SEE,放射科医生 2 识别出 39.1%(43/110)的病例存在 SEE。亚组分析表明,基于月经状态,SEE 的检测无显著差异。放射科医生 1 评估的 49 例中有 24.5%(12/49)、放射科医生 2 评估的 43 例中有 32.6%(14/43)的 SEE 区域被认为可靠,可用于评估子宫内膜和子宫肌层之间的界面。在研究的 110 名女性中,放射科医生 1 观察到 10.9%(n=12)、放射科医生 2 观察到 12.7%(n=14)的病例存在可靠的 SEE 区域,可用于评估子宫内膜和子宫肌层之间的界面。使用动态 CE MRI 评估 SEE 可能在评估子宫内膜和子宫肌层之间的界面方面能力有限。