• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生避孕知识评估量表中文版的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the contraceptive knowledge assessment scale in college students.

机构信息

Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Shanghai Evidence-based Nursing Centre, School of Nursing, Fudan University, NO.305 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200035, China.

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2810. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20337-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20337-8
PMID:39402504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472492/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To translate and revise the Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment (CKA) scale and apply it to Chinese college male/female students. After cross-cultural adjustment of the source scale, the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale were tested.

STUDY DESIGN

This study utilized a cross-sectional research design. Translation, cognitive interviews and a psychometric evaluation were carried out. A survey was then conducted among 388 college students in Shanghai to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CKA scale.

RESULTS

There were 22 items in the Chinese version. Factor analysis extracted 8 common factors, with a cumulative contribution rate of 58.923%, and 3 items were eliminated. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.793, and the test-retest reliability Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.743.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the CKA scale has good reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing the level of contraceptive knowledge.

摘要

目的

翻译并修订避孕知识评估(CKA)量表,并将其应用于中国大学生男/女学生。在对源量表进行跨文化调整后,测试了该量表中文版的信度和效度。

研究设计

本研究采用横断面研究设计。进行了翻译、认知访谈和心理测量评估。然后在上海的 388 名大学生中进行了一项调查,以测试 CKA 量表中文版的信度和效度。

结果

中文版有 22 个项目。因子分析提取出 8 个共同因素,累计贡献率为 58.923%,并剔除了 3 个项目。克朗巴赫α系数为 0.793,重测信度 Pearson 相关系数为 0.743。

结论

CKA 量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,适用于评估避孕知识水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec6e/11472492/6a3130bbf043/12889_2024_20337_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec6e/11472492/5292cecb6b80/12889_2024_20337_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec6e/11472492/6a3130bbf043/12889_2024_20337_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec6e/11472492/5292cecb6b80/12889_2024_20337_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec6e/11472492/6a3130bbf043/12889_2024_20337_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the contraceptive knowledge assessment scale in college students.大学生避孕知识评估量表中文版的信度和效度。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2810. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20337-8.
2
Development and validation of college students' tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes and practices questionnaire (CS-TBKAPQ).大学生结核病知识、态度和行为问卷(CS-TBKAPQ)的编制与验证
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):949. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4960-x.
3
Development and reliability and validity test of the sleep health literacy scale for college students.大学生睡眠健康素养量表的编制及信效度检验
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22455-3.
4
The reliability and validity of the depression change expectancy scale in college students: a cross-sectional study in China.大学生抑郁变化预期量表的信效度:一项中国的横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 10;15(1):8198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92573-w.
5
Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students.中文版儿童虐待自我报告量表短式的信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 8;12(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01734-5.
6
The Chinese version of the general benefit finding scale (GBFS): Psychometric properties in a sample of college students.一般效益发现量表(GBFS)中文版:大学生样本中的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0300064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300064. eCollection 2024.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest) in College Students.中文版认知歪曲问卷(CD-Quest)在大学生中的信效度研究
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 30;26:e926786. doi: 10.12659/MSM.926786.
8
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
9
Chinese translation and validation of the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI) for medical college students.医学专业大学生个性化心理灵活性指数(PPFI)的中文翻译与验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 6;12(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02121-w.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Scale of Effects of Social Media on Eating Behaviour and research of its influencing factors.社交媒体对饮食行为影响量表中文版的心理计量学评价及其影响因素研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 17;24(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17923-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Sexual Health-Focused Contraceptive Decision Aid for Diverse Young Adults: User-Centered Usability Study.评估以性健康为重点的避孕决策辅助工具对不同年轻成年人的可接受性和可行性:以用户为中心的可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 3;7:e44170. doi: 10.2196/44170.
2
Contraceptive acceptability and associated factors among young women (15-24) living with HIV/AIDS: a hospital-based study in Kampala, Uganda.避孕措施的可接受性及其在感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的年轻妇女(15-24 岁)中的相关因素:乌干达坎帕拉基于医院的研究。
Afr Health Sci. 2022 Mar;22(1):21-27. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i1.4.
3
Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire (Chinese version, FLEQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation.
食物素养评估问卷(中文版,FLEQ-Ch):信度和跨文化调适研究。
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Nov;39(6):1386-1394. doi: 10.1111/phn.13118. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
4
Turkish adaptation of contraceptive knowledge assessment scale and its validity and reliability study in Turkey.土耳其避孕知识评估量表的土耳其语适应性及其在土耳其的有效性和可靠性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Aug;48(8):2198-2207. doi: 10.1111/jog.15279. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Contraceptive knowledge among women at risk of unintended pregnancy in Kingston, Jamaica.牙买加金斯敦有意外怀孕风险的女性的避孕知识。
Women Health. 2021 Mar;61(3):294-302. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.1876812. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
6
Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness and method use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam.越南河内女性对避孕效果及避孕方法使用情况的了解
Contracept X. 2019;1:100009. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100009.
7
Sexuality and contraceptive knowledge in university students: instrument development and psychometric analysis using item response theory.大学生的性行为和避孕知识:使用项目反应理论开发工具和心理测量分析。
Reprod Health. 2019 Aug 22;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0791-9.
8
Confirming the Reliability and Validity of Others' Evaluation Tools Before Adopting for Your Programs.在将他人的评估工具应用于您的项目之前,确认其可靠性和有效性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 May;49(5):441-450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.02.006.
9
Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment: validity and reliability of a novel contraceptive research tool.避孕知识评估:一种新型避孕研究工具的有效性和可靠性
Contraception. 2017 Feb;95(2):190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
Cognitive behavior therapy for psychological distress in patients with recurrent miscarriage.认知行为疗法治疗复发性流产患者的心理困扰。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013 Jul 19;6:37-43. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S44327. Print 2013.