• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国社区关爱青年调查:危险因素的维度和有效性。

The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;12:1472347. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472347. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472347
PMID:39403431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471490/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communities That Care (CTC) is an evidence-based community change strategy for supporting healthy youth development. One of its key elements is the development of a community profile to identify and prioritise risk factors for health and behavioural problems in adolescents based on the CTC Youth Survey. The strategy was originally developed and evaluated in the United States. An adapted version of the survey has been used in Germany since its first implementation in 2008. However, the dimensionality and validity of the adapted risk factor scales have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to confirm the assumed unidimensional structure and to establish the concurrent criterion validity of each risk factor.

METHODS

A sample of 1,911 adolescents attending grades six to eleven in Lower-Saxony, Germany, was used to evaluate 23 risk factor scales of the German CTC Youth Survey covering the domains peer/individual, family, school, and community. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the dimensional structure of all risk factors with sufficient item numbers. Goodness of fit was determined using CFI, SRMR, and RMSEA. Latent regression analysis tested the concurrent criterion validity of all unidimensional risk factors. For this, violent and delinquent behaviour, substance use, and depressive symptomatology were regressed on each risk factor.

RESULTS

All evaluable risk factors demonstrated acceptable to good model fit regarding unidimensionality and predicted violent and delinquent behaviour, and substance use better than depressive symptomatology. Regarding the peer/individual risk factors, there are particularly high correlations with violent and delinquent behaviour, and substance use. In contrast, two risk factors were not correlated with substance use, whilst two other risk factors were not correlated with depressive symptomatology.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the results indicate that most risk factors demonstrate unidimensionality and are valid in terms of concurrent criterion validity. Although some risk factors were not correlated with every outcome, they still predicted most outcomes, suggesting that the CTC Youth Survey is a viable tool for communities to assess their community risk profile. Risk factors that did not demonstrate unidimensionality or concurrent criterion validity should be monitored in future surveys and interpreted with caution until further evidence is available.

摘要

背景

社区关怀(CTC)是一种基于证据的社区变化策略,用于支持青少年的健康发展。其关键要素之一是根据 CTC 青少年调查制定社区概况,以确定和优先考虑青少年健康和行为问题的风险因素。该策略最初在美国开发和评估。自 2008 年首次实施以来,德国一直在使用该调查的改编版本。然而,改编后的风险因素量表的维度和有效性尚未得到评估。因此,本研究旨在确认假设的单维结构,并建立每个风险因素的同时效标准效度。

方法

使用德国下萨克森州六至十一年级的 1911 名青少年样本,评估德国 CTC 青少年调查涵盖同伴/个体、家庭、学校和社区领域的 23 个风险因素量表。使用足够项目数的确认性因子分析评估所有风险因素的维度结构。使用 CFI、SRMR 和 RMSEA 确定拟合优度。潜在回归分析测试所有单维风险因素的同时效标准效度。为此,将暴力和违法行为、物质使用和抑郁症状分别回归到每个风险因素上。

结果

所有可评估的风险因素在单维性方面均表现出可接受至良好的模型拟合,并且预测暴力和违法行为以及物质使用的效果优于抑郁症状。关于同伴/个体风险因素,与暴力和违法行为以及物质使用具有特别高的相关性。相比之下,有两个风险因素与物质使用不相关,而另外两个风险因素与抑郁症状不相关。

结论

总体而言,结果表明,大多数风险因素表现出单维性,并且在同时效标准效度方面是有效的。尽管一些风险因素与每个结果都不相关,但它们仍然预测了大多数结果,这表明 CTC 青少年调查是社区评估其社区风险概况的可行工具。没有表现出单维性或同时效标准效度的风险因素应在未来的调查中进行监测,并在获得进一步证据之前谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors.德国社区关爱青年调查:危险因素的维度和有效性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;12:1472347. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472347. eCollection 2024.
2
Familial risk and protective factors in alcohol intoxicated adolescents: psychometric evaluation of the family domain of the Communities That Care Youth Survey (CTC) and a new short version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).酒精中毒青少年的家族风险与保护因素:“关爱社区青少年调查”(CTC)家庭领域的心理测量评估以及新版简短版“儿童期创伤问卷”(CTQ)
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 19;15:191. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0471-z.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
The revision and factor analytic evaluation of the German version of the depression literacy scale (D-Lit-R German).《抑郁素养量表(D-Lit-R 德文版)的修订与因子分析评估》。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 25;12(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01730-9.
5
Psychometric properties of the German version of the CRAFFT.德国版CRAFFT的心理测量特性。
Addict Behav. 2016 Aug;59:42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of 'Communities That Care Youth Survey'.《关爱社区青少年调查》伊朗版本的心理测量特性
Health Promot Int. 2016 Mar;31(1):59-72. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau062. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
7
Cross-sectional relationship of perceived familial protective factors with depressive symptoms in vulnerable youth.易受伤害青年感知到的家庭保护因素与抑郁症状的横断面关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1618-x.
8
Multi-level validation of the German physical activity self-efficacy scale in a sample of female sixth-graders.多层面验证德国身体活动自我效能量表在女性六年级学生样本中的应用。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09096-4.
9
The 39-item Child Exposure to Community Violence (CECV) scale: exploratory factor analysis and relationship to PTSD symptomatology in trauma-exposed children and adolescents.39 项儿童社区暴力暴露量表:创伤暴露儿童和青少年 PTSD 症状的探索性因子分析及相关性。
Int J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;20(4):599-608. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9269-7.
10
Adaptation of the Communities That Care Youth Survey for use in Brazil: A pilot study.《适应巴西国情的“关爱社区青年调查”:一项试点研究》。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab109.

本文引用的文献

1
Study protocol: a non-randomised community trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the communities that care prevention system in Germany.研究方案:一项在德国评估社区关怀预防系统有效性的非随机社区试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;21(1):1927. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11935-x.
2
Psychometrics and cultural adaptations of the Communities That Care Youth Survey: A systematic review.心理计量学与“关心社区的青年调查”的文化适应性:系统评价。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;49(7):2892-2904. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22529. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
3
The effects of interventions preventing self-harm and suicide in children and adolescents: an overview of systematic reviews.预防儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀的干预措施的效果:系统评价概述
F1000Res. 2019 Jun 20;8:890. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19506.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Public Health Benefits 16 Years After a Statewide Policy Change: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania.十六年后的全州政策变化:宾夕法尼亚州的“关心社区”公共卫生效益。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):947-958. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01028-y.
5
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
6
The Interplay Between Marijuana-Specific Risk Factors and Marijuana Use Over the Course of Adolescence.大麻特定风险因素与大麻使用在青少年时期的相互作用。
Prev Sci. 2019 Feb;20(2):235-245. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0882-9.
7
The Communities That Care Brief Depression Scale: Psychometric Properties and Criterion Validity.《关爱社区简明抑郁量表:心理测量特性与效标效度》
J Community Psychol. 2016 Apr;44(3):391-398. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21766. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
8
Implementation and adaptation in Colombia of the Communities That Care.在哥伦比亚实施和调整“关爱社区”项目。
Adicciones. 2015 Dec 15;27(4):253-64. doi: 10.20882/adicciones.750.
9
Familial risk and protective factors in alcohol intoxicated adolescents: psychometric evaluation of the family domain of the Communities That Care Youth Survey (CTC) and a new short version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).酒精中毒青少年的家族风险与保护因素:“关爱社区青少年调查”(CTC)家庭领域的心理测量评估以及新版简短版“儿童期创伤问卷”(CTQ)
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 19;15:191. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0471-z.
10
Economic Models of Preventive Dentistry for Australian Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.澳大利亚儿童和青少年预防性牙科的经济模型:系统评价
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(6):481-94. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a35005.