Center of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 30;15:1425578. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1425578. eCollection 2024.
Does the presence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) in oocytes adversely impact the euploidy rate of subsequent blastocysts?
We performed a retrospective cohort study with 671 young patients (< 38 years) undergoing their first preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between January 2019 and October 2022 at a reproductive medical center of university affiliated teaching hospitals in China. Cycles were categorized as either SERa(+) cycles (containing at least one SERa(+) oocyte) or SERa(-) cycles (all oocytes without SERa). In SERa(+) cycles, oocytes were further subdivided into the SERa(+) oocyte group and the sibling SERa(-) oocyte group, comprising oocytes with normal morphology.
No significant differences were observed in the normal fertilization rate (72.9% vs. 75.4% vs. 72.6%, P=0.343), and cleavage rate (96.8% vs. 97.1% vs. 96.4%, P=0.839) among the SERa(-) cycle group, the SERa(-) oocyte group, and the SERa(+) oocyte group. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of good quality embryos (44.7% vs. 48.8% vs. 46.2%, P=0.177) or blastocyst formation (60.1% vs. 60.9% vs. 60.5%, P=0.893) among the groups. However, the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes was significantly lower compared to those from SERa(-) oocytes in SERa(+) cycles and normal oocytes in SERa(-) cycles (39.3% vs. 51.2% vs. 54.5%, P=0.005). Despite this, there were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after euploid embryo transfer among the three groups.
Blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes have a lower euploidy rate than those derived from SERa(-) oocytes. Nevertheless, comparable reproductive outcomes were achieved following euploid embryo transfer from both SERa(+) and SERa(-) oocytes.
卵母细胞中是否存在光滑内质网聚集(SERa)会对随后的囊胚的整倍体率产生不利影响?
我们在中国的一家生殖医学中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该中心对 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间进行首次植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)的 671 名年轻患者(<38 岁)进行了研究。周期分为 SERa(+)周期(至少有一个 SERa(+)卵母细胞)或 SERa(-)周期(所有卵母细胞均无 SERa)。在 SERa(+)周期中,卵母细胞进一步细分为 SERa(+)卵母细胞组和同胞 SERa(-)卵母细胞组,包括形态正常的卵母细胞。
在 SERa(-)周期组、SERa(-)卵母细胞组和 SERa(+)卵母细胞组中,正常受精率(72.9%比 75.4%比 72.6%,P=0.343)和卵裂率(96.8%比 97.1%比 96.4%,P=0.839)无显著差异。此外,优质胚胎率(44.7%比 48.8%比 46.2%,P=0.177)和囊胚形成率(60.1%比 60.9%比 60.5%,P=0.893)在各组之间也无统计学差异。然而,在 SERa(+)周期中,来自 SERa(+)卵母细胞的囊胚的整倍体率明显低于来自 SERa(-)卵母细胞的囊胚,而在 SERa(-)周期中,来自正常卵母细胞的囊胚的整倍体率则明显高于来自 SERa(-)卵母细胞的囊胚(39.3%比 51.2%比 54.5%,P=0.005)。尽管如此,在三组中,整倍体胚胎移植后的妊娠和新生儿结局无显著差异。
来自 SERa(+)卵母细胞的囊胚的整倍体率低于来自 SERa(-)卵母细胞的囊胚。然而,来自 SERa(+)和 SERa(-)卵母细胞的整倍体胚胎移植后获得了相当的生殖结局。