• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生护理中伦理责任的描述性与解释性理论。

A descriptive and interpretive theory of ethical responsibility in public health nursing.

作者信息

Clancy Anne, Hovden Julia Thuve, Laholt Hilde

机构信息

The Arctic University of Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1143-1161. doi: 10.1177/09697330241291161. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/09697330241291161
PMID:39403717
Abstract

This article presents a descriptive, interpretive theory of ethical responsibility in public health nursing. The theory is based on qualitative empirical studies, a purposeful literature review and meta-ethnography of public health nurses' experiences of ethical responsibility, interpreted within a philosophical framework. Levianasian philosophy provides the main direction for the authors' interpretations. The path for theory development consists of three phases: , ''. The theory illustrates that ethical responsibility in public health nursing is related to the life existentials of temporality and human relationships. Due to blurred boundaries in these essential life structures, public health nurses can experience a sense of satisfaction but also worries, uncertainties and loneliness. The study reveals paradoxical connections between fear and courage, and between freedom, autonomy and a sense of entrapment in responsible relationships. The authors purport that the results of this study are relevant for education and practice and can provide direction for further studies on developing theories of ethical responsibility in other nursing specialities.

摘要

本文提出了一种关于公共卫生护理中伦理责任的描述性、解释性理论。该理论基于定性实证研究、有目的的文献综述以及对公共卫生护士伦理责任体验的元民族志研究,并在一个哲学框架内进行解释。列维纳斯哲学为作者的解释提供了主要方向。理论发展路径包括三个阶段:“……”。该理论表明,公共卫生护理中的伦理责任与时间性和人际关系的生命存在性相关。由于这些基本生命结构中的界限模糊,公共卫生护士可能会体验到满足感,但也会有担忧、不确定性和孤独感。该研究揭示了恐惧与勇气之间以及自由、自主性与责任关系中的被困感之间的矛盾联系。作者声称,本研究结果与教育和实践相关,可为其他护理专业伦理责任理论发展的进一步研究提供方向。

相似文献

1
A descriptive and interpretive theory of ethical responsibility in public health nursing.公共卫生护理中伦理责任的描述性与解释性理论。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1143-1161. doi: 10.1177/09697330241291161. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Public health nurses' experiences of ethical responsibility: A meta-ethnography.公共卫生护士的伦理责任体验:元民族志研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Aug;31(5):875-895. doi: 10.1177/09697330231209294. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
3
'Faced' with responsibility: Levinasian ethics and the challenges of responsibility in Norwegian public health nursing.面对责任:列维纳斯伦理学与挪威公共卫生护理中的责任挑战
Nurs Philos. 2007 Jul;8(3):158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00311.x.
4
Courage and nursing practice: a theoretical analysis.勇气与护理实践:理论分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2010 Sep;17(5):551-65. doi: 10.1177/0969733010369475.
5
Solving ethical dilemmas in nursing practice.解决护理实践中的伦理困境。
Top Clin Nurs. 1982 Apr;4(2):15-21.
6
The Relationships Between Ethical Sensitivity, Ethical Decision-Making Ability, and Ethical Conflict Among ICU Nurses: A Structural Equation Model.重症监护室护士的伦理敏感性、伦理决策能力与伦理冲突之间的关系:结构方程模型
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 3;2025:7756343. doi: 10.1155/jonm/7756343. eCollection 2025.
7
An embodied response: ethics and the nurse researcher.具身回应:伦理与护士研究者。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Jan;18(1):112-21. doi: 10.1177/0969733010385531.
8
Navigating the ethical "space in-between" nurses' lived experiences in forensic inpatient care interpreted through Løgstrup's ethical philosophy.通过勒格斯特鲁普的伦理哲学解读法医住院护理中护士生活经历之间的伦理“中间地带”
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2514520. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2514520. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
9
Autonomy, responsibility and the Italian Code of Deontology for Nurses.自主性、责任与意大利护士职业道德准则
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Jan;14(1):83-98. doi: 10.1177/0969733007069695.
10
Conceptual issues in nursing ethics research.护理伦理学研究中的概念问题。
J Med Philos. 1991 Jun;16(3):235-58. doi: 10.1093/jmp/16.3.235.