• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中LaserSAFE技术检测手术切缘阳性的准确性:盲法评估及评分者间一致性分析

Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.

作者信息

Almeida-Magana Ricardo, Au Matthew, Al-Hammouri Tarek, Mathew Manju, Dinneen Kate, Mendes Larissa S T, Dinneen Eoin, Vreuls Willem, Shaw Greg, Freeman Alex, Haider Aiman

机构信息

Department of Targeted Intervention, University College, London, UK.

Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2025 Feb;86(3):433-440. doi: 10.1111/his.15336. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/his.15336
PMID:39403832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11707496/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new imaging modality capable of generating digital microscopic resolution scans of fresh surgical specimens, and holds potential as an alternative to frozen section (FS) analysis for intra-operative assessment of surgical margins. Previously, we described the LaserSAFE technique as an application of FCM for margin assessment in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Histolog® scanner. This study describes the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of FCM imaging compared to corresponding paraffin-embedded analysis (PA) among four blinded pathologists for the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RARP specimens from patients enrolled in the control arm of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study (NCT03317990) were analysed from April 2022 to February 2023. Prostate specimens were imaged using the Histolog® scanner before formalin fixation and PA. Four trained assessors, blinded to PA, reviewed and analysed FCM images of the posterolateral prostatic surface.

RESULTS

A total of 31 prostate specimens were included in the study. PA per lateral side of the prostate identified 11 instances of positive margins. Among the four histopathologists included in our study, FCM achieved a sensitivity of 73-91 and specificity of 94-100% for the presence of PSM. Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement on PSM was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.92), indicating substantial agreement.

CONCLUSION

This blinded analysis of FCM versus PA among histopathologists with different experience levels demonstrated high accuracy and substantial inter-rater agreement for diagnosing PSM. This supports the role of the FCM as an alternative to FS.

摘要

引言与目的

荧光共聚焦显微镜(FCM)是一种新的成像方式,能够对新鲜手术标本进行数字显微分辨率扫描,并且作为术中评估手术切缘的冰冻切片(FS)分析的替代方法具有潜力。此前,我们将LaserSAFE技术描述为使用Histolog®扫描仪的FCM在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中评估切缘的一种应用。本研究描述了在四位不知情的病理学家之间,FCM成像与相应石蜡包埋分析(PA)相比,对于阳性手术切缘(PSM)存在情况的准确性和评估者间一致性。

材料与方法

2022年4月至2023年2月期间,对参与NeuroSAFE PROOF研究(NCT03317990)对照臂的患者的RARP标本进行分析。前列腺标本在福尔马林固定和PA之前使用Histolog®扫描仪进行成像。四位经过培训的评估者在不知情PA结果的情况下,对前列腺后外侧表面的FCM图像进行了审查和分析。

结果

本研究共纳入了31个前列腺标本。前列腺每一侧的PA识别出11例阳性切缘。在我们研究的四位组织病理学家中,FCM对于PSM存在情况的敏感性为73 - 91%,特异性为94 - 100%。评估者间关于PSM的一致性的Fleiss' Kappa为0.78(95%置信区间 = 0.64 - 0.92),表明有实质性一致性。

结论

在不同经验水平的组织病理学家中对FCM与PA进行的这项盲法分析表明,在诊断PSM方面具有高准确性和评估者间的实质性一致性。这支持了FCM作为FS替代方法的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a03/11707496/31d6e0695a04/HIS-86-433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a03/11707496/cca07144ff28/HIS-86-433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a03/11707496/31d6e0695a04/HIS-86-433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a03/11707496/cca07144ff28/HIS-86-433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a03/11707496/31d6e0695a04/HIS-86-433-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中LaserSAFE技术检测手术切缘阳性的准确性:盲法评估及评分者间一致性分析
Histopathology. 2025 Feb;86(3):433-440. doi: 10.1111/his.15336. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Evaluation of margins during radical prostatectomy: confocal microscopy vs frozen section analysis.根治性前列腺切除术时切缘的评估:共聚焦显微镜与冷冻切片分析比较。
BJU Int. 2024 Nov;134(5):773-780. doi: 10.1111/bju.16441. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中荧光共聚焦显微镜下的数字冰冻切片:手术技术
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):724-729. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment in prostatectomy: IP8-FLUORESCE study protocol.用于前列腺切除术中切缘评估的荧光共聚焦显微镜检查:IP8-FLUORESCE研究方案。
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):502-509. doi: 10.1111/bju.16588. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
5
Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.共聚焦激光显微镜在根治性前列腺切除术中评估手术切缘的应用。
BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.15938. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
6
NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.NeuroSAFE PROOF:一项单盲、理想阶段 3、多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案,比较 NeuroSAFE 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌男性患者的疗效。
Trials. 2022 Jul 22;23(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7.
7
Centralized prostatectomy with intraoperative NeuroSAFE margin assessment improves surgical margin control.术中使用 NeuroSAFE 切缘评估的集中前列腺切除术可改善手术切缘控制。
Histopathology. 2024 Nov;85(5):760-768. doi: 10.1111/his.15291. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
8
Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real-time pathological examination of prostatic tissue.体外荧光共聚焦显微镜:实时前列腺组织病理检查的首次应用。
BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):469-476. doi: 10.1111/bju.14754. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
3D-printed model for resection of positive surgical margins in robot-assisted prostatectomy.用于机器人辅助前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘切除的3D打印模型。
BJU Int. 2025 Apr;135(4):657-667. doi: 10.1111/bju.16595. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
10
NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomized controlled trial.神经安全冰冻切片在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的应用:来自神经安全 PROOF 可行性随机对照试验的围手术期和组织病理学结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Jun;127(6):676-686. doi: 10.1111/bju.15256. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
New evidence and novel techniques for assessing intraoperative margins during radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术中评估手术切缘的新证据和新技术。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01087-7.
2
Re-Operation Rate for Breast Conserving Surgery Using Confocal Histolog Scanner for Intraoperative Margin Assessment-SHIELD Study.使用共聚焦组织学扫描仪进行术中切缘评估的保乳手术再手术率——SHIELD研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 12;17(10):1640. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101640.
3
Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A New Procedure in the Pathology Laboratory Workflow.

本文引用的文献

1
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2024 更新。第一部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
2
Patient-reported Side Effects 1 Year After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Register-based Nationwide Study.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术或放疗 1 年后患者报告的副作用:基于登记的全国性研究。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):605-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
共聚焦激光显微镜在保乳手术术中切缘评估中的应用:病理实验室工作流程中的一项新程序
Am J Surg Pathol. 2025 May 5;49(9):909-922. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002409.
Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术患者阳性切缘对死亡率的影响:来自欧洲泌尿外科学会机器人泌尿外科分会科学工作组的 20 年报告。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;7(4):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Improving fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The LaserSAFE technique.
BJU Int. 2024 Jun;133(6):677-679. doi: 10.1111/bju.16239. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
5
Accuracy of Ex-vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Margin Assessment of Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.实体瘤切缘评估中离体荧光共聚焦显微镜的准确性:系统评价。
J Histochem Cytochem. 2023 Dec;71(12):661-674. doi: 10.1369/00221554231212948. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
6
Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.神经安全技术在前列腺癌根治术中应用后对尿失禁和性功能的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Sep;9(5):824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.021. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
7
The NeuroSAFE frozen section technique during radical prostatectomy - Implementation and optimization of technical aspects in a routine pathology workflow.神经安全冰冻切片技术在根治性前列腺切除术:在常规病理工作流程中技术方面的实施和优化。
Pathol Res Pract. 2023 Feb;242:154297. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154297. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
8
Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.共聚焦激光显微镜在根治性前列腺切除术中评估手术切缘的应用。
BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.15938. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
9
NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.NeuroSAFE PROOF:一项单盲、理想阶段 3、多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案,比较 NeuroSAFE 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌男性患者的疗效。
Trials. 2022 Jul 22;23(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7.
10
Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.阴性多参数磁共振成像可在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术前行排除前列腺癌的前列腺外侵犯。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 23;12(5):1057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051057.