van Kwawegen Calvin B, Fijnvandraat Karin, Kruip Marieke J H A, de Meris Joke, Schols Saskia E M, Meijer Karina, van der Bom Johanna G, Cnossen Marjon H, van Galen Karin P M, Atiq Ferdows, Eikenboom Jeroen, Leebeek Frank W G
Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Pediatric Hematology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Haemophilia. 2024 Nov;30(6):1348-1356. doi: 10.1111/hae.15103. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
The severity of Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is currently based on laboratory phenotype. However, little is known about the severity of the patient's experience with the disease. The most recent VWD guidelines highlight the need for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in VWD.
The study aimed to investigate the patient-perspective on VWD severity and to identify key factors that determine the severity of disease experienced by patients.
Patients participated in a nationwide cross-sectional study on VWD in the Netherlands (WiN-study). Patients filled in a questionnaire containing questions on the experienced severity of VWD (4-point scale), bleeding score (BS) and quality of life (QoL).
We included 736 patients, median age of 41.0 years (IQR 23.0-55.0) and 59.5% were women. A total of 443 had type 1, 269 type 2 and 24 type 3 VWD. Self-reported severity of VWD was categorized as severe (n = 52), moderate (n = 171), mild (n = 393) or negligible (n = 120). Classification by historically lowest FVIII:C levels < 0.20 IU/mL as a proxy for severe VWD aligned with patient-reported severity classification with a 72% accuracy. Type 3 VWD (OR = 4.02, 95%CI: 1.72-9.45), higher BS (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.06-1.11), female sex (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.01-1.83), haemostatic treatment in the year preceding study inclusion (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.10-2.13) and historically lowest VWF:Act levels (OR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.07-1.00) were independent determinants of patient-reported severity.
This study shows that patient-reported data provide novel insights into the determinants of experienced disease severity. Our findings highlight the need for studies on PROs with validated questionnaires to assess the burden of VWD.
血管性血友病(VWD)的严重程度目前基于实验室表型。然而,对于患者所经历疾病的严重程度知之甚少。最新的VWD指南强调了血管性血友病患者报告结局(PROs)的必要性。
本研究旨在调查患者对VWD严重程度的看法,并确定决定患者所经历疾病严重程度的关键因素。
患者参与了荷兰一项关于VWD的全国性横断面研究(WiN研究)。患者填写了一份问卷,其中包含关于VWD经历严重程度(4分制)、出血评分(BS)和生活质量(QoL)的问题。
我们纳入了736名患者,中位年龄为41.0岁(四分位间距23.0 - 55.0),59.5%为女性。共有443例1型、269例2型和24例3型VWD。自我报告的VWD严重程度分为重度(n = 52)、中度(n = 171)、轻度(n = 393)或可忽略不计(n = 120)。以历史上最低FVIII:C水平<0.20 IU/mL作为重度VWD的替代指标进行分类,与患者报告的严重程度分类相符,准确率为72%。3型VWD(比值比[OR]=4.02,95%置信区间[CI]:1.72 - 9.45)、较高的出血评分(OR = 1.09,95%CI:1.06 - 1.11)、女性(OR = 1.36,95%CI:1.01 - 1.83)、纳入研究前一年的止血治疗(OR = 1.53,95%CI:1.10 - 2.13)以及历史上最低的VWF:Act水平(OR = 0.26,95%CI:0.07 - 1.00)是患者报告严重程度的独立决定因素。
本研究表明,患者报告的数据为所经历疾病严重程度的决定因素提供了新的见解。我们的研究结果强调了需要通过经过验证的问卷对PROs进行研究,以评估VWD的负担。