Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):280-300. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003265.
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.
These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.
ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.
The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.
Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.
血管性血友病(VWD)是人类已知的最常见的遗传性出血性疾病。准确和及时的诊断存在诸多挑战。
这些由美国血液学会(ASH)、国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)、国家血友病基金会(NHF)和世界血友病联盟(WFH)制定的循证指南旨在为患者、临床医生和其他医疗保健专业人员提供支持,帮助他们做出关于 VWD 诊断的决策。
ASH、ISTH、NHF 和 WFH 成立了一个多学科指南小组,其中包括 4 名患者代表,并进行了平衡,以尽量减少潜在的利益冲突偏见。堪萨斯大学医学中心(KUMC)的结果和实施研究单位支持了指南制定过程,包括对截至 2020 年 1 月 8 日的系统证据进行更新或审查。该小组根据对临床医生和患者的重要性对临床问题和结果进行了优先排序。该小组使用了推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)方法,包括 GRADE 证据决策框架,来评估证据并提出建议,这些建议随后会受到公众意见的评议。
小组就 11 项建议达成一致。
这些指南的主要建议包括出血评估工具在疑似 VWD 患者评估中的作用、1 型和 2 型 VWD 的诊断检测和实验室截止值、如何处理随时间推移而水平正常化的 1 型 VWD 患者,以及基因检测与 2B 和 2N 型表型检测的作用。未来也确定了关键的研究重点。