Suppr超能文献

低强度激光和LED光疗法治疗脱发:系统评价与荟萃分析

Low-Level Laser and LED Therapy in Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Perez Sofia M, Vattigunta Mounika, Kelly Colin, Eber Ariel

机构信息

All authors are affiliated with the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2025 Feb 1;51(2):179-183. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004442. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-level laser/LED therapy (LLLT) has been described as a treatment option for alopecia, but no study has comprehensively reviewed its efficacy in multiple alopecia types.

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate LLLT for various alopecia types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of LLLT on patients diagnosed with alopecia. Prespecified outcome measure was the change in hair density. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean difference in hair density before and after LLLT compared with placebo.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included that described 3,098 patients with androgenetic alopecia (2,930/3,098), scarring alopecia (49/3,098), alopecia areata (50/3,098), telogen effluvium (17/3,098), and chemotherapy-induced alopecia (32/3,098). The mean change in hair density increased significantly in androgenetic alopecia patients after LLLT for 4 to 26 weeks compared with placebo (<20 weeks: SMD = 1.14; 95% CI [0.51-1.78]; p = .000; I 2 = 88.26%; >20 weeks: SMD = 1.44; 95% CI [0.97-1.91]; p = .000; I 2 = 80.81%). Change in hair density was reported in 5 studies evaluating other alopecia types; however, statistical information was insufficient for meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

LLLT is a promising treatment option for patients with androgenetic alopecia, but future studies are needed to better understand its efficacy in other alopecia types.

摘要

背景

低能量激光/发光二极管疗法(LLLT)已被描述为一种治疗脱发的方法,但尚无研究全面评估其对多种脱发类型的疗效。

目的

回顾和评估LLLT对各种脱发类型的疗效。

材料与方法

对PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL进行系统检索,以确定评估LLLT对诊断为脱发患者疗效的研究。预先设定的结局指标是头发密度的变化。进行荟萃分析以计算LLLT治疗前后与安慰剂相比头发密度的标准化平均差异。

结果

纳入38项研究,共描述了3098例患者,其中雄激素性脱发2930例(2930/3098)、瘢痕性脱发49例(49/3098)、斑秃50例(50/3098)、休止期脱发17例(17/3098)和化疗所致脱发32例(32/3098)。与安慰剂相比,雄激素性脱发患者接受LLLT治疗4至26周后头发密度的平均变化显著增加(<20周:标准化平均差[SMD]=1.14;95%可信区间[0.51 - 1.78];p = 0.000;I² = 88.26%;>20周:SMD = 1.44;95%可信区间[0.97 - 1.91];p = 0.000;I² = 80.81%)。5项评估其他脱发类型的研究报告了头发密度的变化;然而,统计信息不足以进行荟萃分析。

结论

LLLT对雄激素性脱发患者是一种有前景的治疗选择,但需要进一步研究以更好地了解其对其他脱发类型的疗效。

相似文献

3
Low-level laser therapy as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia.低能量激光疗法治疗雄激素性脱发
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):27-39. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22512. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss.低能量激光(光)疗法治疗脱发
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):144-51. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22170. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Comprehensive Guide for Cosmetic Dermatologists.额部纤维性秃发:美容皮肤科医生综合指南
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jan;15(1):15-29. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01311-z. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验