Verhaar Nicole, Hammer Elisabeth, Reineking Wencke, Hewicker-Trautwein Marion, Geburek Florian
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Vet Surg. 2025 Jan;54(1):208-218. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14178. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
To compare the practicability and tissue sample quality between different intestinal biopsy techniques.
Experimental, randomized ex vivo study.
Small intestine of nine horses.
Four different biopsy techniques were evaluated in the aboral jejunum and the ileum within 1 h after euthanasia. One segment was used as control (C), and the applied techniques included an 8 mm biopsy punch (BP), transverse wedge resection (TW), longitudinal wedge resection with transverse closure (LW) and a longitudinal sample using Eppendorfer biopsy forceps (EF). Defects were closed using a single-layer continuous Lembert pattern. Duration of the procedure, intestinal diameter, contamination, and bursting pressure were determined. The quality of the obtained tissue samples for histological assessment was evaluated using a semiquantitative score. The jejunal and ileal samples were analyzed separately.
All biopsy procedures including defect closure were completed within 5 min, with shorter closure times for BP (p = .03). Minimal contamination could be noted in 1/8 TW and 2/8 LW cases, without significant differences between the groups. Longitudinal closure techniques (BP, EF) showed more constriction than transverse closures (TW, LW) (p < .05). Bursting pressure was >75 mmHg in all cases. Technique BP showed significantly lower biopsy quality scores (p = .009).
The tested biopsy techniques could all be applied effectively within a reasonable time frame, yet the biopsy punch was associated with significant artifacts and risk of missing mucosa.
The findings provide insights into the possible advantages and limitations of the different techniques and alert the surgeon to potential issues with the quality of the tissue sample.
比较不同肠道活检技术的实用性和组织样本质量。
实验性、随机离体研究。
9匹马的小肠。
在安乐死后1小时内,对空肠远端和回肠进行四种不同的活检技术评估。一段作为对照(C),应用的技术包括8毫米活检打孔器(BP)、横向楔形切除术(TW)、纵向楔形切除术并横向缝合(LW)以及使用艾本德活检钳获取纵向样本(EF)。缺损采用单层连续伦伯特缝合法闭合。测定手术时间、肠直径、污染情况和破裂压力。使用半定量评分评估所获组织样本用于组织学评估的质量。空肠和回肠样本分别进行分析。
所有活检操作包括缺损闭合均在5分钟内完成,BP的闭合时间更短(p = 0.03)。在1/8的TW和2/8的LW病例中可观察到最小程度的污染,各组之间无显著差异。纵向闭合技术(BP、EF)比横向闭合技术(TW、LW)显示出更多的狭窄(p < 0.05)。所有病例的破裂压力均>75 mmHg。技术BP显示出显著较低的活检质量评分(p = 0.009)。
所测试的活检技术均可在合理时间内有效应用,但活检打孔器会产生明显伪像并有遗漏黏膜的风险。
这些发现为不同技术的可能优势和局限性提供了见解,并提醒外科医生注意组织样本质量的潜在问题。