Suppr超能文献

马小肠全层活检技术的体外比较

Ex vivo comparison of full-thickness biopsy techniques in the equine small intestine.

作者信息

Verhaar Nicole, Hammer Elisabeth, Reineking Wencke, Hewicker-Trautwein Marion, Geburek Florian

机构信息

Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 2025 Jan;54(1):208-218. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14178. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the practicability and tissue sample quality between different intestinal biopsy techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental, randomized ex vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Small intestine of nine horses.

METHODS

Four different biopsy techniques were evaluated in the aboral jejunum and the ileum within 1 h after euthanasia. One segment was used as control (C), and the applied techniques included an 8 mm biopsy punch (BP), transverse wedge resection (TW), longitudinal wedge resection with transverse closure (LW) and a longitudinal sample using Eppendorfer biopsy forceps (EF). Defects were closed using a single-layer continuous Lembert pattern. Duration of the procedure, intestinal diameter, contamination, and bursting pressure were determined. The quality of the obtained tissue samples for histological assessment was evaluated using a semiquantitative score. The jejunal and ileal samples were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

All biopsy procedures including defect closure were completed within 5 min, with shorter closure times for BP (p = .03). Minimal contamination could be noted in 1/8 TW and 2/8 LW cases, without significant differences between the groups. Longitudinal closure techniques (BP, EF) showed more constriction than transverse closures (TW, LW) (p < .05). Bursting pressure was >75 mmHg in all cases. Technique BP showed significantly lower biopsy quality scores (p = .009).

CONCLUSION

The tested biopsy techniques could all be applied effectively within a reasonable time frame, yet the biopsy punch was associated with significant artifacts and risk of missing mucosa.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The findings provide insights into the possible advantages and limitations of the different techniques and alert the surgeon to potential issues with the quality of the tissue sample.

摘要

目的

比较不同肠道活检技术的实用性和组织样本质量。

研究设计

实验性、随机离体研究。

样本群体

9匹马的小肠。

方法

在安乐死后1小时内,对空肠远端和回肠进行四种不同的活检技术评估。一段作为对照(C),应用的技术包括8毫米活检打孔器(BP)、横向楔形切除术(TW)、纵向楔形切除术并横向缝合(LW)以及使用艾本德活检钳获取纵向样本(EF)。缺损采用单层连续伦伯特缝合法闭合。测定手术时间、肠直径、污染情况和破裂压力。使用半定量评分评估所获组织样本用于组织学评估的质量。空肠和回肠样本分别进行分析。

结果

所有活检操作包括缺损闭合均在5分钟内完成,BP的闭合时间更短(p = 0.03)。在1/8的TW和2/8的LW病例中可观察到最小程度的污染,各组之间无显著差异。纵向闭合技术(BP、EF)比横向闭合技术(TW、LW)显示出更多的狭窄(p < 0.05)。所有病例的破裂压力均>75 mmHg。技术BP显示出显著较低的活检质量评分(p = 0.009)。

结论

所测试的活检技术均可在合理时间内有效应用,但活检打孔器会产生明显伪像并有遗漏黏膜的风险。

临床意义

这些发现为不同技术的可能优势和局限性提供了见解,并提醒外科医生注意组织样本质量的潜在问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f1/11734869/fb6a30d8e979/VSU-54-208-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验