Zheng Shaofeng, Tanaka Rina, Ishii Keiko
Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study Brain Research Center, Hitotsubashi University.
Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University.
Emotion. 2025 Apr;25(3):644-656. doi: 10.1037/emo0001451. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
Previous research has suggested that empathic concern may affect cultural differences in social support-seeking. However, neither the mechanisms through which empathic concern promotes support-seeking nor the explanations for cultural differences in empathic concern are clear. This study attempted to address these questions by conducting three studies in Japan and the United States. The results showed that Japanese participants reported having lower trait-empathic concern and seeking less social support in dealing with stress than European Americans. Study 1 found that trait-empathic concern mediated the cultural differences in support-seeking by increasing beliefs about others' prosocial willingness. Using a controlled set of stressful scenarios, Study 2 replicated the results of Study 1. Additionally, Study 2 showed that Japanese participants reported greater endorsement of the causal repressive suffering construal than European Americans, partly accounting for cultural differences in trait-empathic concern. Using an experimental design, Study 3 showed that primed empathic concern increased support-seeking in coping with follow-up stress across cultures. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of empathic concern in support-seeking and cultural differences in empathic concern. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,共情关注可能会影响寻求社会支持方面的文化差异。然而,共情关注促进寻求支持的机制以及共情关注文化差异的解释都尚不清楚。本研究试图通过在日本和美国进行三项研究来解决这些问题。结果显示,与欧裔美国人相比,日本参与者报告称在应对压力时特质共情关注较低,寻求的社会支持也较少。研究1发现,特质共情关注通过增加对他人亲社会意愿的信念来介导寻求支持方面的文化差异。研究2使用一组受控的压力情境重复了研究1的结果。此外,研究2表明,与欧裔美国人相比,日本参与者对因果抑制性痛苦解释的认同度更高,这在一定程度上解释了特质共情关注的文化差异。研究3采用实验设计表明,启动的共情关注会增加跨文化背景下应对后续压力时寻求支持的行为。这些发现有助于我们理解共情关注在寻求支持中的作用以及共情关注的文化差异。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)