Analyzing the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device in pediatric aneurysms: insight from a mul-ticenter cohort and pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with intracranial aneurysms face high risks of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhages. Despite its approval for adults aged 22 and above, the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED, Covidien/Medtronic, Irvine, California, USA) is being considered for younger patients due to its efficacy. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of using PEDs in pediatric aneurysm treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study across 14 institutions identified 25 patients (age ≤ 18) treated with PED from November 2014 to October 2019. A literature review included all published pediatric aneurysm cases treated with PED from 2007 to 2023. Analyzed data included patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment, clinical outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

We analyzed 81 pediatric patients, including 25 from the multi-center registry and 56 from 38 relevant literature. In the entire cohort of 81 patients, mean age of the patients was 11.9 ± 4.0 years (ranged from 9 months to 18 years), with 58.0% males. Ruptured aneurysms were observed in 7 patients (8.6%), whereas 43 patients (53.1%) harbored large/giant aneurysms. The aneurysm occlusion rate was 87.7% during the median 7 months follow-up. Complications occurred in 12.3% of patients, resulting in morbidity in 5 cases (6.1%) and mortality in 4 cases (4.9%). Patient age was not associated with the occurrence of aneurysm residual, complications, and mortality following PED treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PED can be effective for pediatric aneurysms, but morbidity and mortality can be substantial compared to the adults. Surgical timing should depend on clinical judgment and patient factors, without age-related delays.