• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年对参与基于网络的心理健康项目的看法:焦点小组研究

Perspectives of Children and Adolescents on Engaging With a Web-Based Mental Health Program: Focus Group Study.

作者信息

Cahill Christopher, Connolly Jennifer, Appleton Shelley, White Melanie Jade

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia, 61 7 3138 8970.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Oct 15;7:e48910. doi: 10.2196/48910.

DOI:10.2196/48910
PMID:39405079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495236/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite accessibility and clinical benefits, open access trials of self-guided digital health interventions (DHIs) for young people have been plagued by high drop-out rates, with some DHIs recording completion rates of less than 3%.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore how young people motivate themselves to complete an unpleasant task and to explore perceived motivators and demotivators for engaging with a DHI.

METHODS

In this qualitative research study, 30 children and adolescents aged between 7 and 17 years were recruited to participate in 7 focus groups conducted over a 3-month period. Focus group activities and discussions explored sources of motivation to complete tasks and engage in a hypothetical 6-week DHI for anxiety.

RESULTS

Children (aged 7-11 years) reported greater reliance on external motivators such as following parent instruction to complete unpleasant tasks, while adolescents (aged 12-17 years) reported greater internal motivation such as self-discipline. Program factors, such as engaging content, were the most commonly mentioned motivators for engaging with a DHI across both age groups. After that, internal sources of motivation were most commonly mentioned, such as perceived future benefits. External factors were the most commonly mentioned demotivators across all ages, with time commitment being the most frequently mentioned.

CONCLUSIONS

The study's findings have implications for enhancing adherence in future DHIs targeted to children and adolescents. Recommendations include the need for supportive parental involvement for children, while adolescents would likely benefit from mechanisms that promote autonomy, establish a supportive environment, and align with personal interests and values. Belief that a DHI will provide short-term benefits is important to both children and adolescents, as well as having confidence that future benefits will be realized.

摘要

背景

尽管自助式数字健康干预措施(DHI)具有可及性并能带来临床益处,但针对年轻人的开放式数字健康干预试验一直受到高辍学率的困扰,一些DHI的完成率不到3%。

目的

本研究旨在探讨年轻人如何激励自己完成一项不愉快的任务,并探讨参与DHI的感知激励因素和阻碍因素。

方法

在这项定性研究中,招募了30名7至17岁的儿童和青少年,在3个月的时间内参加7个焦点小组。焦点小组活动和讨论探讨了完成任务以及参与一项为期6周的焦虑症DHI的动机来源。

结果

儿童(7至11岁)报告更多地依赖外部激励因素,如听从父母的指示来完成不愉快的任务,而青少年(12至17岁)则报告有更强的内部动机,如自律。在两个年龄组中,诸如引人入胜的内容等项目因素是参与DHI最常被提及的激励因素。在此之后,最常被提及的是内部动机来源,如感知到的未来益处。外部因素是所有年龄段最常被提及的阻碍因素,其中时间投入是最常被提及的。

结论

该研究结果对提高未来针对儿童和青少年的DHI的依从性具有启示意义。建议包括儿童需要父母的支持性参与,而青少年可能会从促进自主性、建立支持性环境以及符合个人兴趣和价值观的机制中受益。相信DHI会带来短期益处对儿童和青少年都很重要,同时也要对未来能实现益处有信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/fa1ea766f325/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/737da4cf85da/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/79f6432314e5/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/fa1ea766f325/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/737da4cf85da/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/79f6432314e5/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d140/11495236/fa1ea766f325/pediatrics-v7-e48910-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Children and Adolescents on Engaging With a Web-Based Mental Health Program: Focus Group Study.儿童和青少年对参与基于网络的心理健康项目的看法:焦点小组研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Oct 15;7:e48910. doi: 10.2196/48910.
2
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
3
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.让儿童和青少年参与数字心理健康干预:对提供方式、促进因素和障碍的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317. doi: 10.2196/16317.
4
Attitudes of Children, Adolescents, and Their Parents Toward Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review.儿童、青少年及其家长对数字健康干预措施的态度:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 2;25:e43102. doi: 10.2196/43102.
5
Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.儿童和青少年数字健康干预措施的经济评价:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 3;25:e45958. doi: 10.2196/45958.
6
Perceived Effectiveness and Motivations for the Use of Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Qualitative Study.基于网络的心理健康项目使用的感知效果和动机:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 31;22(7):e16961. doi: 10.2196/16961.
7
Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems - a systematic and meta-review.年度研究综述:针对有心理健康问题的儿童和青少年的数字健康干预措施——一项系统综述与元分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12663. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies.倾听社区声音:对弱势母亲和孕妇参与数字健康技术情况的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 5;19(7):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7736.
10
A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.服务用户对使用数字健康干预措施进行严重精神健康问题自我管理的看法的定性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial.保护动机理论筛查工具预测慢性下背痛康复依从性:一项随机对照试验分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 3;12(2):e052644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644.
2
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.让儿童和青少年参与数字心理健康干预:对提供方式、促进因素和障碍的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317. doi: 10.2196/16317.
3
Logging into therapy: Adolescent perceptions of online therapies for mental health problems.
登录治疗:青少年对心理健康问题在线治疗的看法。
Internet Interv. 2016 Dec 24;15:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.12.001. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Patients' experiences in a guided Internet- and App-based stress intervention for college students: A qualitative study.大学生基于互联网和应用程序的压力引导干预中患者的体验:一项定性研究。
Internet Interv. 2017 Dec 29;12:130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.12.001. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.
6
Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems - a systematic and meta-review.年度研究综述:针对有心理健康问题的儿童和青少年的数字健康干预措施——一项系统综述与元分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12663. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches.评估数字健康干预措施:关键问题与方法
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):843-851. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008.
8
Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies.了解影响患者和公众参与及招募到数字健康干预措施的因素:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
9
A systematic review of online youth mental health promotion and prevention interventions.系统评价在线青少年心理健康促进和预防干预措施。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Jan;44(1):90-113. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0165-0. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
10
Pretreatment attrition and formal withdrawal during treatment and their predictors: an exploratory study of the anxiety online data.治疗前的损耗以及治疗期间的正式退出及其预测因素:一项关于焦虑在线数据的探索性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 17;16(6):e152. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2989.