Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, USA, 60612.
Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Dec;98:103294. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103294. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
External, environmental perturbations (e.g., slips) account for >60% of falls and lead to severe health-related consequences. Perturbation training paradigms are known to reduce slip-related fall risk by improving two key aspects of reactive balance control: center of mass (COM) stability and limb support. However, perturbation training requires complex technology and is difficult to implement outside of the laboratory. This study examined if key reactive balance mechanisms could also be improved via more clinically translatable balance exercises targeting both volitional and reactive balance control (i.e., domain-specific balance training).
12 young adults completed a single session of domain-specific balance training and were exposed to a single overground slip (S1-Domain-Specific). The control group (n = 12) was exposed to 24 overground slips (S1-24-Control) without prior training. On the first (novel) slip, we compared reactive balance performance (rate of falls and loss of balance, margin of stability (MOS), limb support) between the training and control groups (S1-Domain-Specific vs. S1-Control). We also compared key reactive balance outcomes between S1-Domain-Specific and the final slip of the control group (S24-Control).
There was a lower rate of backward loss of balance on S1-Domain-Specific than S1-Control, along with higher post-slip MOS and increased hip height (i.e., greater limb support) (p < 0.05). These improvements were associated with a more anterior COM position, greater COM velocity in the anterior direction, and reduced slip distance. Post-slip MOS and hip height were not significantly different between S1-Domain-Specific and S24-Control.
A single session of domain-specific balance training improved key components of reactive balance control and could significantly reduce slip-related fall risk. Domain-specific balance training might provide similar fall prevention benefits as perturbation training, with easier transition into clinics, communities, and homes.
外部环境干扰(例如滑倒)导致的跌倒占比超过 60%,并导致严重的健康相关后果。已有的研究表明,通过改善质心(COM)稳定性和肢体支撑这两个反应性平衡控制的关键方面,可降低与滑倒相关的跌倒风险。但是,干扰训练需要复杂的技术,并且难以在实验室之外实施。本研究通过更具临床转化意义的平衡练习(即特定领域的平衡训练)来测试,是否也可以改善关键的反应性平衡机制。
12 名年轻人完成了一次特定领域的平衡训练,并接受了一次地面滑跌(S1-特定领域)的暴露。对照组(n=12)在没有预先训练的情况下接受了 24 次地面滑跌(S1-24-对照组)。在第一次(新的)滑跌中,我们比较了训练组(S1-特定领域)和对照组(S1-对照组)的反应性平衡性能(跌倒率和失去平衡、稳定裕度(MOS)、肢体支撑)。我们还比较了 S1-特定领域和对照组的最后一次滑跌(S24-对照组)之间的关键反应性平衡结果。
S1-特定领域的向后失去平衡的比例低于 S1-对照组,并且在滑跌后 MOS 和髋关节高度增加(即肢体支撑增加)(p<0.05)。这些改善与 COM 位置更靠前、COM 向前方向的速度更大以及滑跌距离减小有关。S1-特定领域和 S24-对照组之间的滑跌后 MOS 和髋关节高度没有显著差异。
单次特定领域的平衡训练可改善反应性平衡控制的关键组成部分,并可显著降低与滑倒相关的跌倒风险。特定领域的平衡训练可能会提供与干扰训练类似的跌倒预防益处,并且更容易过渡到临床、社区和家庭。