Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia; Interdisciplinary Research Center for Construction and Building Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122857. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122857. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
The urgent need to eliminate Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) has positioned electrooxidation (EO) as a key solution for pollutant degradation. This study evaluates several machine learning (ML) models, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), and Deep Learning (DL), to predict EO efficiency in PFOA removal. Using 10-fold cross-validation, the RF model outperformed others with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.7 and a correlation coefficient of 0.965, demonstrating its robustness and accuracy across diverse operational settings. Feature importance within the RF model was analyzed using Gini impurity and Mean Decrease in Accuracy (MDA). Electrolysis Time consistently emerged as the most influential factor in both analyses, underscoring its pivotal role in providing extended exposure of PFOA molecules to reactive species at the electrode surfaces. The study also found strong agreement between Gini and MDA in identifying Current Density and Anode Material as critical factors, although MDA placed slightly more emphasis on Anode Material. Differences between Gini and MDA were more pronounced in the ranking of Electrolyte Type and Concentration, with MDA assigning higher importance to Electrolyte Concentration. In contrast, the Water Matrix was consistently ranked as the least important factor. The strong concordance between Gini and MDA highlights the reliability of the RF model in identifying key drivers of electrochemical degradation. Overall, this work contributes significantly to the advancement of pollutant degradation technologies, presenting a reliable ML-based tool for environmental remediation efforts.
消除全氟辛酸 (PFOA) 的迫切需求使电氧化 (EO) 成为污染物降解的关键解决方案。本研究评估了几种机器学习 (ML) 模型,包括 K-最近邻 (KNN)、决策树 (DT)、随机森林 (RF)、梯度提升决策树 (GBDT) 和深度学习 (DL),以预测 EO 去除 PFOA 的效率。使用 10 倍交叉验证,RF 模型表现优于其他模型,均方根误差 (RMSE) 为 7.7,相关系数为 0.965,证明了其在不同操作设置下的稳健性和准确性。使用基尼杂质和平均减少精度 (MDA) 对 RF 模型中的特征重要性进行了分析。在这两种分析中,电解时间始终是最重要的因素,这突出表明它在为电极表面的反应性物质提供延长的 PFOA 分子暴露方面起着关键作用。该研究还发现,基尼和 MDA 在识别电流密度和阳极材料作为关键因素方面具有很强的一致性,尽管 MDA 对阳极材料的重视略高一些。在电解质类型和浓度的排名中,基尼和 MDA 之间的差异更为明显,MDA 认为电解质浓度更为重要。相比之下,水基质始终被评为最重要的因素。基尼和 MDA 之间的高度一致性突出了 RF 模型在识别电化学降解关键驱动因素方面的可靠性。总的来说,这项工作为污染物降解技术的发展做出了重大贡献,为环境修复工作提供了一种可靠的基于 ML 的工具。