• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野生动物监测前线的护林员:乌干达尼罗河流域非洲狮案例研究。

Rangers on the frontline of wildlife monitoring: a case study on African lions in Uganda's Nile Delta.

机构信息

Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2024 Oct 15;7(1):1308. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06796-0.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-024-06796-0
PMID:39406804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11480496/
Abstract

Regular population monitoring of imperilled charismatic species such as large carnivores is critical for conservation. However, the role of monitoring in conservation is frequently diminished due to: 1) surveys being implemented in isolation, 2) limited on-ground-capacity leading to infrequent monitoring, and 3) inappropriate methods being applied. Wildlife monitoring is often resource-intensive and the utility and cost of different field protocols is rarely reported. In this study we deployed two standard field protocols aimed at collecting data on African lions within a spatial capture-recapture framework. For our first protocol, we trained Uganda Wildlife Authority rangers in search-encounter techniques, the industry gold standard for monitoring lions. The second protocol involved deploying 32 paired stations of state-of-the-art infra-red camera traps. During the search-encounter protocol, two rangers covered 2939 km in 76 days, recording 102 detections (30 individuals) in a ~ 256 km area. The resulting density estimates (13.91 lions/100 km2, posterior SD = 2.34) yielded acceptable precision. Conversely, 64 camera traps over 1601 trap nights yielded two usable lion detections. We argue that where wildlife tourism rangers exist, they could be a powerful addition to future lion and wildlife census attempts across the continent. Our results confirm that the current technology of store-bought infra-red camera traps is not suitable for individual identification of lions, and therefore cannot be applied to analytical models that require unambiguous individual identities. However, we encourage the continued testing and advancement of infra-red camera trap technology since in many instances, this may be preferable to white-flash camera traps, which can yield individual identities for lions. Our study also shows the immense importance of the Nile Delta for African lions in Uganda’s Murchison Falls National Park, a protected area with both oil extraction and high rates of anthropogenic snaring pressure.

摘要

对濒危有魅力物种(如大型食肉动物)进行常规的种群监测对于保护至关重要。然而,监测在保护中的作用经常被削弱,原因有三:1)调查孤立进行,2)地面能力有限导致监测不频繁,3)应用了不适当的方法。野生动物监测通常需要大量资源,不同实地协议的效用和成本很少有报道。在这项研究中,我们部署了两种标准的实地协议,旨在在空间捕获-再捕获框架内收集关于非洲狮的数据。对于我们的第一个协议,我们培训乌干达野生动物管理局的护林员使用搜索-发现技术,这是监测狮子的行业黄金标准。第二个协议涉及部署 32 对最先进的红外相机陷阱。在搜索-发现协议中,两名护林员在 76 天内覆盖了 2939 公里,在一个约 256 公里的区域记录了 102 次发现(30 只个体)。由此产生的密度估计值(13.91 只/100 平方公里,后验标准差=2.34)具有可接受的精度。相比之下,64 个相机陷阱在 1601 个陷阱夜间只产生了两个可用的狮子检测。我们认为,在有野生动物旅游护林员的地方,他们可以成为未来整个非洲大陆狮子和野生动物普查尝试的有力补充。我们的结果证实,目前商店购买的红外相机陷阱技术不适合狮子的个体识别,因此不能应用于需要明确个体身份的分析模型。然而,我们鼓励继续测试和推进红外相机陷阱技术,因为在许多情况下,这可能比闪光灯相机陷阱更可取,闪光灯相机陷阱可以为狮子提供个体身份。我们的研究还表明,尼罗河三角洲对乌干达默奇森瀑布国家公园的非洲狮非常重要,这是一个有石油开采和高人为诱捕压力的保护区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593f/11480496/19f2107ea840/42003_2024_6796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593f/11480496/52a8edac493d/42003_2024_6796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593f/11480496/19f2107ea840/42003_2024_6796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593f/11480496/52a8edac493d/42003_2024_6796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593f/11480496/19f2107ea840/42003_2024_6796_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rangers on the frontline of wildlife monitoring: a case study on African lions in Uganda's Nile Delta.野生动物监测前线的护林员:乌干达尼罗河流域非洲狮案例研究。
Commun Biol. 2024 Oct 15;7(1):1308. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06796-0.
2
Long-distance swimming by African lions in Uganda.乌干达的非洲狮进行长距离游泳。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):e11597. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11597. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
A multispecies assessment of wildlife impacts on local community livelihoods.多物种评估野生动物对当地社区生计的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):297-306. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13565. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
4
Genetic diversity, population structure and kinship relationships highlight the environmental influence on Uganda's indigenous goat populations.遗传多样性、种群结构和亲属关系凸显了环境对乌干达本土山羊种群的影响。
Front Genet. 2024 May 30;15:1385611. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1385611. eCollection 2024.
5
Uganda's eco-rebirth.乌干达的生态重生。
Our Planet. 1991;3(1):8-9.
6
Insights into the management of large carnivores for profitable wildlife-based land uses in African savannas.洞察大型食肉动物的管理,以实现非洲热带稀树草原基于野生动物的土地利用的盈利。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059044. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
7
The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human-carnivore coexistence.人与食肉动物共存中有形和无形因素的重要性。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Aug;35(4):1233-1244. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13678. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Prioritizing core areas, corridors and conflict hotspots for lion conservation in southern Africa.优先考虑南部非洲狮子保护的核心区域、走廊和冲突热点。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0196213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196213. eCollection 2018.
9
Contacts between domestic livestock and wildlife at the Kruger National Park Interface of the Republic of South Africa.南非共和国克鲁格国家公园接壤地区的家畜与野生动物接触情况。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Jan 1;103(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
10
A nationwide assessment of the biodiversity value of Uganda's important bird areas network.乌干达重要鸟类区域网络生物多样性价值的全国性评估。
Conserv Biol. 2006 Feb;20(1):85-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00318.x.

本文引用的文献

1
How "science" can facilitate the politicization of charismatic megafauna counts.“科学”如何推动魅力型大型动物的政治化很重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 17;119(20):e2203244119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203244119. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Lions in a coexistence landscape: Repurposing a traditional field technique to monitor an elusive carnivore.共存环境中的狮子:重新利用传统野外技术监测一种难以捉摸的食肉动物。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 1;12(3):e8662. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8662. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
A strategy for the next decade to address data deficiency in neglected biodiversity.
应对被忽视生物多样性数据缺乏的下一个十年战略。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):502-509. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13589. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Tourist photographs as a scalable framework for wildlife monitoring in protected areas.旅游照片作为保护区野生动物监测的可扩展框架。
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 22;29(14):R681-R682. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.056.
5
Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems.协作式环境治理:实现社会-生态系统中的集体行动。
Science. 2017 Aug 18;357(6352). doi: 10.1126/science.aan1114.
6
Toward accurate and precise estimates of lion density.迈向对狮子密度的准确和精确估计。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):934-943. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12878. Epub 2017 May 29.
7
Scent Lure Effect on Camera-Trap Based Leopard Density Estimates.气味诱饵对基于相机陷阱的豹密度估计的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0151033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151033. eCollection 2016.
8
Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models.贝叶斯推断在一类空间捕获-再捕获模型的相机陷阱研究中的应用。
Ecology. 2009 Nov;90(11):3233-44. doi: 10.1890/08-1481.1.
9
Monitoring for conservation.为保护而进行监测。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 Aug 17.