Elliot Nicholas B, Gopalaswamy Arjun M
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Oxfordshire, OX13 5QL, U.K.
Mara Lion Project, Kenya Wildlife Trust, P.O. Box 86-00502 Karen, Nairobi, Kenya.
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):934-943. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12878. Epub 2017 May 29.
Reliable estimates of animal density are fundamental to understanding ecological processes and population dynamics. Furthermore, their accuracy is vital to conservation because wildlife authorities rely on estimates to make decisions. However, it is notoriously difficult to accurately estimate density for wide-ranging carnivores that occur at low densities. In recent years, significant progress has been made in density estimation of Asian carnivores, but the methods have not been widely adapted to African carnivores, such as lions (Panthera leo). Although abundance indices for lions may produce poor inferences, they continue to be used to estimate density and inform management and policy. We used sighting data from a 3-month survey and adapted a Bayesian spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) model to estimate spatial lion density in the Maasai Mara National Reserve and surrounding conservancies in Kenya. Our unstructured spatial capture-recapture sampling design incorporated search effort to explicitly estimate detection probability and density on a fine spatial scale, making our approach robust in the context of varying detection probabilities. Overall posterior mean lion density was estimated to be 17.08 (posterior SD 1.310) lions >1 year old/100 km , and the sex ratio was estimated at 2.2 females to 1 male. Our modeling framework and narrow posterior SD demonstrate that SECR methods can produce statistically rigorous and precise estimates of population parameters, and we argue that they should be favored over less reliable abundance indices. Furthermore, our approach is flexible enough to incorporate different data types, which enables robust population estimates over relatively short survey periods in a variety of systems. Trend analyses are essential to guide conservation decisions but are frequently based on surveys of differing reliability. We therefore call for a unified framework to assess lion numbers in key populations to improve management and policy decisions.
对动物密度进行可靠估计是理解生态过程和种群动态的基础。此外,其准确性对于保护工作至关重要,因为野生动物管理部门依靠这些估计来做出决策。然而,对于低密度分布的大范围食肉动物而言,准确估计其密度是出了名的困难。近年来,亚洲食肉动物的密度估计取得了重大进展,但这些方法尚未广泛应用于非洲食肉动物,如狮子(Panthera leo)。尽管狮子的数量指数可能会产生不准确的推断,但它们仍被用于估计密度并为管理和政策提供依据。我们利用为期3个月的调查中的目击数据,并采用贝叶斯空间明确捕获-重捕(SECR)模型来估计肯尼亚马赛马拉国家保护区及周边保护区内狮子的空间密度。我们的非结构化空间捕获-重捕抽样设计纳入了搜索努力,以在精细空间尺度上明确估计检测概率和密度,使我们的方法在检测概率变化的情况下具有稳健性。总体后验均值狮子密度估计为17.08(后验标准差1.310)只1岁以上的狮子/100平方公里,性别比估计为每1只雄性对应2.2只雌性。我们的建模框架和较窄的后验标准差表明,SECR方法可以产生统计上严谨且精确地种群参数估计值,并且我们认为相较于可靠性较低的数量指数,它们更应受到青睐。此外,我们的方法足够灵活,可以纳入不同的数据类型,这使得在各种系统中相对较短的调查期内能够进行稳健地种群估计。趋势分析对于指导保护决策至关重要,但通常基于可靠性不同的调查。因此,我们呼吁建立一个统一的框架来评估关键种群中的狮子数量,以改善管理和政策决策。