• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症和沟通障碍患者的疼痛评估:人工智能赋能可穿戴设备使用的可行性研究。

Pain Assessment for Patients with Dementia and Communication Impairment: Feasibility Study of the Usage of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Wearables.

机构信息

Geneva School of Economics and Management, University of Geneva, 1200 Geneva, Switzerland.

United Nations Secretary General's Envoy on Technology, New York, NY 10017, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;24(19):6298. doi: 10.3390/s24196298.

DOI:10.3390/s24196298
PMID:39409338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11478472/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies on machine learning have shown the potential to provide new methods with which to assess pain through the measurement of signals associated with physiologic responses to pain detected by wearables. We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate the real-world feasibility of using an AI-enabled wearable system for pain assessment with elderly patients with dementia and impaired communication.

METHODS

Sensor data were collected from the wearables, as well as observational data-based conventional everyday interventions. We measured the adherence, completeness, and quality of the collected data. Thereafter, we evaluated the most appropriate classification model for assessing the detectability and predictability of pain.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients completed the trial period, and 10 of them had complete sensor and observational datasets. We extracted 206 matched records containing a 180 min long data segment from the sensor's dataset. The final dataset comprised 153 subsets labelled as moderate pain and 53 labelled as severe pain. After noise reduction, we compared the recall and precision performances of 14 common classification algorithms. The light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) classifier presented optimal values for both performances.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings tended to show that electrodermal activity (EDA), skin temperature, and mobility data are the most appropriate for pain detection.

摘要

背景

最近的机器学习研究表明,通过可穿戴设备检测到的与生理疼痛反应相关的信号测量,有望提供新的疼痛评估方法。我们进行了一项前瞻性试点研究,以评估使用人工智能支持的可穿戴系统对患有痴呆症和沟通障碍的老年患者进行疼痛评估的实际可行性。

方法

从可穿戴设备以及基于观察数据的常规日常干预中收集传感器数据。我们测量了收集数据的依从性、完整性和质量。然后,我们评估了最适合评估疼痛可检测性和可预测性的分类模型。

结果

共有 18 名患者完成了试验期,其中 10 名患者有完整的传感器和观察数据集。我们从传感器数据集提取了 206 个包含 180 分钟长数据段的匹配记录。最终数据集包括 153 个标记为中度疼痛的子集和 53 个标记为重度疼痛的子集。经过降噪后,我们比较了 14 种常见分类算法的召回率和精度性能。轻梯度提升机(LGBM)分类器在这两个性能方面均表现出最佳值。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,皮肤电活动(EDA)、皮肤温度和活动数据最适合用于疼痛检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf2/11478472/e4c59243a740/sensors-24-06298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf2/11478472/86d1345b7145/sensors-24-06298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf2/11478472/e4c59243a740/sensors-24-06298-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf2/11478472/86d1345b7145/sensors-24-06298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf2/11478472/e4c59243a740/sensors-24-06298-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain Assessment for Patients with Dementia and Communication Impairment: Feasibility Study of the Usage of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Wearables.痴呆症和沟通障碍患者的疼痛评估:人工智能赋能可穿戴设备使用的可行性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;24(19):6298. doi: 10.3390/s24196298.
2
Applying Artificial Intelligence to Wearable Sensor Data to Diagnose and Predict Cardiovascular Disease: A Review.应用人工智能于可穿戴传感器数据以诊断和预测心血管疾病:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;22(20):8002. doi: 10.3390/s22208002.
3
Ensemble machine learning model trained on a new synthesized dataset generalizes well for stress prediction using wearable devices.在新合成数据集上训练的集成机器学习模型,对于使用可穿戴设备进行压力预测具有良好的泛化能力。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Dec;148:104556. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104556. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
4
Use of Mobile Health Apps and Wearable Technology to Assess Changes and Predict Pain During Treatment of Acute Pain in Sickle Cell Disease: Feasibility Study.利用移动健康应用程序和可穿戴技术评估镰状细胞病急性疼痛治疗期间的变化并预测疼痛:可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 2;7(12):e13671. doi: 10.2196/13671.
5
Carbohydrate Content Classification Using Postprandial Heart Rate Responses from Non-Invasive Wearables.使用非侵入性可穿戴设备的餐后心率反应进行碳水化合物含量分类。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 17;24(16):5331. doi: 10.3390/s24165331.
6
Predicting cognitive scores from wearable-based digital physiological features using machine learning: data from a clinical trial in mild cognitive impairment.使用机器学习从基于可穿戴设备的数字生理特征预测认知分数:来自轻度认知障碍临床试验的数据。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 25;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03252-y.
7
The Use of Wearables in Clinical Trials During Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.可穿戴设备在癌症治疗临床试验中的应用:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):e22006. doi: 10.2196/22006.
8
Detection of Sleep Apnea Using Wearable AI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用可穿戴人工智能检测睡眠呼吸暂停:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 10;26:e58187. doi: 10.2196/58187.
9
Feasibility and reliability of four pain self-assessment scales and correlation with an observational rating scale in hospitalized elderly demented patients.四种疼痛自我评估量表在老年住院痴呆患者中的可行性、可靠性及其与观察性评定量表的相关性
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Apr;60(4):524-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.4.524.
10
Digital wearable insole-based identification of knee arthropathies and gait signatures using machine learning.基于数字可穿戴鞋垫的机器学习技术识别膝关节病和步态特征。
Elife. 2024 Apr 30;13:e86132. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86132.

引用本文的文献

1
A Conceptual Framework for User Trust in AI Biosensors: Integrating Cognition, Context, and Contrast.人工智能生物传感器用户信任的概念框架:整合认知、情境和对比
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;25(15):4766. doi: 10.3390/s25154766.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective pain stimulation intensity and pain sensation assessment using machine learning classification and regression based on electrodermal activity.基于皮肤电活动的机器学习分类和回归进行客观疼痛刺激强度和疼痛感知评估。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2021 Aug 1;321(2):R186-R196. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00094.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.可穿戴设备:疼痛评估与管理的现状与机遇
Digit Biomark. 2021 Apr 19;5(1):89-102. doi: 10.1159/000515576. eCollection 2021 Jan-Apr.
3
Pain Assessment Tool With Electrodermal Activity for Postoperative Patients: Method Validation Study.
基于皮肤电活动的术后患者疼痛评估工具:方法验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 5;9(5):e25258. doi: 10.2196/25258.
4
Physiological Measures of Acute and Chronic Pain within Different Subject Groups: A Systematic Review.不同受试人群的急性和慢性疼痛的生理测量指标:系统评价。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Sep 3;2020:9249465. doi: 10.1155/2020/9249465. eCollection 2020.
5
Participant outcomes and preferences in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: The electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) development program.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的参与者结局与偏好:电子个性化结局测量(ePSOM)开发项目。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Dec 12;4:694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.013. eCollection 2018.
6
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.患者报告结局在常规医疗中的应用
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383.
7
Physiological Signal-Based Method for Measurement of Pain Intensity.基于生理信号的疼痛强度测量方法。
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 26;11:279. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00279. eCollection 2017.
8
Algoplus® Scale in Older Patients with Dementia: A Reliable Real-World Pain Assessment Tool.适用于老年痴呆患者的Algoplus®量表:一种可靠的真实世界疼痛评估工具。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(2):519-527. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160790.
9
Intervention Study with Algoplus : A Pain Behavioral Scale for Older Patients in the Emergency Department.Algoplus 干预研究:急诊科老年患者疼痛行为量表。
Pain Pract. 2017 Jun;17(5):655-662. doi: 10.1111/papr.12498. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Pain Challenges at the End of Life - Pain and Palliative Care Collaboration.临终时的疼痛挑战——疼痛与姑息治疗协作
Rev Pain. 2010 Oct;4(2):18-23. doi: 10.1177/204946371000400205.