• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和美国消费者对采用低温慢烤法烹制的牛腩的接受度。

Australian and United States Consumer Acceptance of Beef Brisket Cooked Using the Low and Slow Barbeque Method.

作者信息

Lees Jarrod, Hardcastle Nicholas, Johnston Justin, Wong Rohen, Cuthbertson Holly, Tarr Garth, Garmyn Andrea, Miller Markus, Polkinghorne Rod, McGilchrist Peter

机构信息

School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):3049. doi: 10.3390/foods13193049.

DOI:10.3390/foods13193049
PMID:39410084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475886/
Abstract

Meat Standards Australia (MSA) sensory protocols have been effectively utilized in beef for international consumers employing several cooking methods. Our objective was to compare the consumer response of Australian and American consumers to paired beef brisket samples utilizing a newly developed low and slow cooking method. Briskets were collected from Australian carcasses with diverse eating quality. Half of the briskets (n = 24) were retained in Australia and their pair was exported to Texas for consumer sensory testing. Naïve consumers (Australia; n = 240) and familiar consumers (USA; n = 240) evaluated paired barbequed briskets for tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking, and overall liking from 0 to 100 using a visual analogue scale, and a weighted composite meat quality score was later calculated. Australian consumers scored briskets lower for tenderness (-4.84 ± 1.70 points) and juiciness (-4.44 ± 1.55 points) and higher for flavor liking (3.48 ± 1.58 points); however, there was no difference between the countries for overall liking ( = 0.75) and combined meat quality score ( = 0.88). Differences between Australian and US consumers' evaluations indicate that there is an impact of cultural background, potentially driven by Australia's naivety to the low and slow barbeque cooking method.

摘要

澳大利亚肉类标准(MSA)感官评定方法已在牛肉领域得到有效应用,适用于采用多种烹饪方式的国际消费者。我们的目标是比较澳大利亚和美国消费者对使用新开发的低温慢烤烹饪方法烹制的配对牛腩样本的反应。牛腩取自澳大利亚不同食用品质的屠体。其中一半牛腩(n = 24)留在澳大利亚,其配对的牛腩被出口到德克萨斯州进行消费者感官测试。初次接触牛肉的消费者(澳大利亚;n = 240)和熟悉牛肉的消费者(美国;n = 240)使用视觉模拟量表对配对的烤牛腩的嫩度、多汁性、风味喜好和总体喜好进行0至100分的评分,随后计算加权综合肉质得分。澳大利亚消费者对牛腩的嫩度评分较低(-4.84 ± 1.70分),多汁性评分也较低(-4.44 ± 1.55分),但风味喜好评分较高(3.48 ± 1.58分);然而,两国在总体喜好(= 0.75)和综合肉质得分(= 0.88)方面没有差异。澳大利亚和美国消费者评价的差异表明,文化背景存在影响,这可能是由于澳大利亚人对低温慢烤烹饪方法不太熟悉所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/5d4e9c816569/foods-13-03049-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/742edc70678b/foods-13-03049-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/563555fd1431/foods-13-03049-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/5d4e9c816569/foods-13-03049-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/742edc70678b/foods-13-03049-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/563555fd1431/foods-13-03049-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f216/11475886/5d4e9c816569/foods-13-03049-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Australian and United States Consumer Acceptance of Beef Brisket Cooked Using the Low and Slow Barbeque Method.澳大利亚和美国消费者对采用低温慢烤法烹制的牛腩的接受度。
Foods. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):3049. doi: 10.3390/foods13193049.
2
Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.未经训练的消费者对牛肉食用品质的评价:1. 单一综合评分可预测牛肉质量等级。
Animal. 2017 Aug;11(8):1389-1398. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002305. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels.消费者对不同脂肪水平的牛里脊肉排的评价。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Feb;90(2):626-34. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4282. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
4
Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe.牛肉嫩度、多汁性和风味喜好对欧洲牛肉整体喜好的贡献。
Meat Sci. 2020 Oct;168:108190. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108190. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.日本和澳大利亚消费者对牛肉的感官认知比较。
Anim Sci J. 2014 Jan;85(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/asj.12081. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.牛肉顾客满意度:美国农业部质量等级及腌制对消费者对牛外脊牛排评价的影响
J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):662-70. doi: 10.2527/2005.833662x.
7
Descriptive beef flavor and texture attributes relationships with consumer acceptance of US light beef eaters.描述牛肉风味和质地属性与美国轻食牛肉消费者接受度的关系。
Meat Sci. 2023 Oct;204:109252. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109252. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
8
Influence of Kiwifruit Extract Infusion on Consumer Sensory Outcomes of Striploin () and Outside Flat () from Beef Carcasses.猕猴桃提取物注入对牛肉胴体里脊()和外脊()消费者感官结果的影响。
Foods. 2019 Aug 8;8(8):332. doi: 10.3390/foods8080332.
9
Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.利用澳大利亚肉类标准体系预测法国牛肉食用品质。
Animal. 2013 Mar;7(3):524-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001553. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
10
USA millennial and non-millennial beef consumers perception of beef, pork, and chicken.美国千禧一代和非千禧一代消费者对牛肉、猪肉和鸡肉的看法。
Meat Sci. 2024 Aug;214:109516. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109516. Epub 2024 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory and Consumer Evaluation of Smoked Pulled Pork Prepared Using Different Smokers and Different Types of Wood.采用不同烟熏设备和不同种类木屑制作的烟熏 pulled pork 的感官和消费者评价。
J Food Sci. 2019 Mar;84(3):640-649. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14469. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Ossification score is a better indicator of maturity related changes in eating quality than animal age.骨化评分是比动物年龄更能反映食用品质成熟度相关变化的指标。
Animal. 2016 Apr;10(4):718-28. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002700. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.
日本和澳大利亚消费者对牛肉的感官认知比较。
Anim Sci J. 2014 Jan;85(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/asj.12081. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
4
Influence of various traditional seasonings on beef flavor: United States, Spanish, and Argentinian practices.各种传统调味料对牛肉风味的影响:美国、西班牙和阿根廷的做法。
Meat Sci. 2013 Jan;93(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
5
Assessment of the chemical and cooking properties of the major beef muscles and muscle groups.主要牛肉肌肉及肌肉群的化学和烹饪特性评估。
Meat Sci. 2003 Nov;65(3):985-92. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00308-X.
6
Assessment of palatability attributes of the major beef muscles.主要牛肉肌肉的适口性属性评估。
Meat Sci. 2003 Nov;65(3):949-58. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00307-8.
7
Warner-Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles.40 块牛肌肉的 Warner-Bratzler 剪切评估。
Meat Sci. 2003 Aug;64(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5.
8
Sensory evaluation of beef-flavor-intensity, tenderness, and juiciness among major muscles.主要肌肉中牛肉风味强度、嫩度和多汁性的感官评价。
Meat Sci. 1995;39(1):143-7. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(95)80016-6.
9
Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib.评估消费者对牛肩肉和肋排中不同肌肉的接受程度。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Feb;82(2):521-5. doi: 10.2527/2004.822521x.
10
Chilling and cooking rate effects on some myofibrillar determinants of tenderness of beef.冷却和烹饪速率对牛肉嫩度的一些肌原纤维决定因素的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jun;81(6):1473-81. doi: 10.2527/2003.8161473x.