Suppr超能文献

一种粘结性复合树脂与可加工及可打印陶瓷玻璃聚合物材料之间的剪切粘结强度比较。

A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between a Luting Composite Resin and Both Machinable and Printable Ceramic-Glass Polymer Materials.

作者信息

Aydin Nazli, Celik Oge Selin, Guney Ogulcan, Okbaz Onur, Sertdemir Yasar

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey.

The Abdi Sutcu Vocational School of Health Services, Cukurova University, Adana 01790, Turkey.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;17(19):4697. doi: 10.3390/ma17194697.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Weibull characteristics between a luting composite resin and both printable and two different machinable ceramic-glass polymer materials. A total of 36 substrates were prepared, with 12 in each group. Printable substrates (12 mm × 12 mm × 2 mm) were printed by using permanent crown resin (3D-PR). Machinable substrates were obtained from Cerasmart 270 (CS) and Vita Enamic (VE) blocks (2 mm in thickness). The bonding surfaces of substrates were polished and airborne abraded (50 µm AlO). A self-adhesive luting composite resin (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SLC) was applied on substrates with the help of a cylindrical (Ø3 × 3 mm) mold. The SBS test was conducted using a universal test machine. The SBSs of three materials were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( = 0.05). The Weibull modulus was calculated for each material. The Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were carried out for the failure mode analysis. There was no significant difference between the SBSs of the three materials ( = 0.129). The Weibull modulus was 3.76 for the 3D-PR, 4.22 for the CS, and 6.52 for the VE group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the failure modes of the groups ( = 0.986). Mixed-failure fractures were predominantly observed in all three groups. The results show that the SBS of the SLC to printable 3D-PR is comparable to that of CS and VE material. Failure modes of printable 3D-PR show similar results with two different machinable ceramic-glass polymers.

摘要

本研究旨在比较一种粘接复合树脂与可打印及两种不同的可加工陶瓷-玻璃聚合物材料之间的剪切粘接强度(SBS)和威布尔特性。总共制备了36个基底,每组12个。可打印基底(12毫米×12毫米×2毫米)使用永久冠树脂(3D-PR)打印而成。可加工基底由Cerasmart 270(CS)和维他易美(VE)块材(厚度2毫米)制成。基底的粘接表面进行了抛光和空气喷砂处理(50微米氧化铝)。借助圆柱形模具(直径3×3毫米)将一种自粘接复合树脂(RelyX U200,3M ESPE,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗,SLC)涂覆在基底上。使用万能试验机进行SBS测试。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)(α = 0.05)比较三种材料的SBS。计算每种材料的威布尔模量。进行Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验以分析失效模式。三种材料的SBS之间无显著差异(P = 0.129)。3D-PR组的威布尔模量为3.76,CS组为4.22,VE组为6.52。统计分析表明各组的失效模式之间无显著差异(P = 0.986)。在所有三组中主要观察到混合失效断裂。结果表明,SLC与可打印3D-PR的SBS与CS和VE材料相当。可打印3D-PR的失效模式与两种不同的可加工陶瓷-玻璃聚合物相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d00b/11477453/628b70c3742e/materials-17-04697-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验