Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Sep 12;36(4):479-485. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7349.
To measure the influence of postpolymerization condition (dry and water-submerged) and time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes) on the accuracy of additively manufactured model material.
A bar standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to manufacture all the resin specimens using a 3D printer. Two groups (n = 80 each) were created based on postpolymerization condition: dry (D group) and water-submerged (W group). Each group was then divided into four subgroups (D1 to D4 and W1 to W4; n = 20 each), which were each assigned a postpolymerizing time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes). The specimens' dimensions were measured using a low-force digital caliper. The volume was calculated as follows: V = l × w × h. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α = .05).
Significant differences in length, width, height, and volume were found among the subgroups (P < .0018). In all groups, the width dimension (x-axis) presented less accuracy compared to height (z-axis) and length (y-axis) (P < .0018). The D2 and D4 subgroups obtained the closest dimensions to the virtual design, and there were no significant differences between these subgroups (P < .0018). The dry condition showed higher manufacturing accuracy than the water-submerged condition. In the water-submerged subgroups, the highest accuracy was obtained in the W2 and W4 subgroups (P < .0018).
Postpolymerization condition and time influenced the accuracy of the material tested. The dry postpolymerization condition with times of 10 and 40 minutes obtained the highest accuracy.
测量后聚合条件(干燥和水浸)和时间(2、10、20 和 40 分钟)对增材制造模型材料准确性的影响。
使用体素语言(STL)文件制造所有使用 3D 打印机制造的树脂标本。根据后聚合条件创建了两组(每组 80 个标本):干燥(D 组)和水浸(W 组)。然后,每个组被进一步分为四个亚组(D1 至 D4 和 W1 至 W4;每组 20 个标本),每个亚组分配一个后聚合时间(2、10、20 和 40 分钟)。使用低力数字卡尺测量标本的尺寸。体积计算如下:V=l×w×h。Shapiro-Wilk 检验表明数据不符合正态分布。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和成对 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α=0.05)分析数据。
在亚组之间发现长度、宽度、高度和体积存在显著差异(P<0.0018)。在所有组中,与高度(z 轴)和长度(y 轴)相比,宽度(x 轴)呈现较低的准确性(P<0.0018)。D2 和 D4 亚组获得了最接近虚拟设计的尺寸,并且这些亚组之间没有显著差异(P<0.0018)。干燥条件比水浸条件显示出更高的制造精度。在水浸亚组中,W2 和 W4 亚组获得了最高的精度(P<0.0018)。
后聚合条件和时间影响了测试材料的准确性。10 和 40 分钟的干燥后聚合时间获得了最高的准确性。