• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向构建审议性数字媒体:从颠覆到共识。

Toward building deliberative digital media: from subversion to consensus.

作者信息

Pentland Alex, Tsai Lily

机构信息

Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Stanford University, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Mail Code: 4115, Stanford, CA 94301, USA.

GovLab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 30 Wadsworth Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae407. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae407. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae407
PMID:39411091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475399/
Abstract

Evidence-based and human-centric design of digital media platforms could reduce many of the problems of misinformation, polarization, and misaligned incentives that plague both society and individual organizations. With these sorts of design changes, it may become possible to build deliberative digital media that are useful both for discussions of contentious issues and for achieving successful collective action. In this Perspective paper, we discuss several issues in which current-day social science indicates the origin of these problems and suggests methods for improvement. Finally, we analyze a popular deliberative democracy platform to illustrate how social science might enable design of next-generation digital media suitable for democratic deliberation, and in which generative artificial intelligence might be useful.

摘要

数字媒体平台基于证据且以人类为中心的设计可以减少困扰社会和各个组织的许多错误信息、两极分化以及激励措施失调等问题。通过这类设计变革,有可能打造出对有争议问题的讨论以及成功的集体行动都有用的审议性数字媒体。在这篇观点论文中,我们讨论了几个当代社会科学表明这些问题根源并提出改进方法的问题。最后,我们分析了一个广受欢迎的审议民主平台,以说明社会科学如何能够助力设计适用于民主审议的下一代数字媒体,以及生成式人工智能可能在其中发挥何种作用。

相似文献

1
Toward building deliberative digital media: from subversion to consensus.迈向构建审议性数字媒体:从颠覆到共识。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae407. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae407. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.股票期权、税收抵免或就业合同!关于人体组织捐赠的审议性公众分歧的价值。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.评估促进者对公众审议原则的忠实度:教程。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 13;7:e51202. doi: 10.2196/51202.
4
Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild: Building Regulatory Capacity to Incorporate Deliberative Democracy.规范野外基因编辑:建立监管能力以纳入审议民主。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S42-S47. doi: 10.1002/hast.1319.
5
Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment.协商系统中的公民科学:参与、认知不公正与公民赋权
Minerva. 2022;60(4):489-508. doi: 10.1007/s11024-022-09467-8. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation.远程政治:为民主创新构建知识流。
Soc Stud Sci. 2022 Feb;52(1):106-126. doi: 10.1177/03063127211033990. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
7
Deepfakes and Democracy (Theory): How Synthetic Audio-Visual Media for Disinformation and Hate Speech Threaten Core Democratic Functions.深度伪造与民主(理论):用于虚假信息和仇恨言论的合成视听媒体如何威胁民主核心功能。
Digit Soc. 2022;1(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Asserting disadvantaged communities' deliberative agency in a media-saturated society.在一个媒体饱和的社会中维护弱势社群的审议机构。
Theory Soc. 2021;50(4):657-677. doi: 10.1007/s11186-020-09421-1. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.社交媒体的社会驱动因素和算法机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.评估民主审议的质量:以公众对代理同意研究伦理的审议为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1896-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging AI for democratic discourse: Chat interventions can improve online political conversations at scale.利用人工智能促进民主对话:聊天干预可以大规模改善在线政治对话。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2311627120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311627120. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding.为什么重视民主的选民会参与民主倒退。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1282-1293. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01594-w. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
A cash lottery increases voter turnout.彩票现金有助于提高投票率。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268640. eCollection 2022.
4
Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation.准确性提示是一种可复制和可推广的方法,可以减少错误信息的传播。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 28;13(1):2333. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30073-5.
5
Accuracy-Risk Trade-Off Due to Social Learning in Crowd-Sourced Financial Predictions.众包金融预测中社会学习导致的准确性-风险权衡
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 24;23(7):801. doi: 10.3390/e23070801.
6
Bayesian collective learning emerges from heuristic social learning.贝叶斯集体学习源自启发式社会学习。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104469. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104469. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Prediction and prevention of disproportionally dominant agents in complex networks.复杂网络中占主导地位的代理预测与预防。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27090-27095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003632117. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
8
Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds.自适应社交网络促进群体智慧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11379-11386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917687117. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
10
Inducing peer pressure to promote cooperation.利用同辈压力促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1735. doi: 10.1038/srep01735.