Manas Abhigyan, Swain Jnana Ranjan, Kantale Shivani Ambadas, R Narayane, S Jeevan Prakash, Seshadri Pavithra Rangarajan, Ms Sabiha Kouser, Tyagi Upasana
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Babu Banarsi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bubhaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bioinformation. 2024 Aug 31;20(8):933-937. doi: 10.6026/973206300200933. eCollection 2024.
A periodontal pocket can result into progressive loss of attachment. Many agents are tried to improve periodontal health. Hence this research was done to estimate the effectiveness of Tetracycline fibers; Probiotics and Chlorhexidine gel as a conjunction to scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. In all, 60 patients between the ages of 25 and 35 who had generalized chronic periodontitis and had a probing pocket depth (PPD) of at least 5 mm were enrolled for this study. Four groups of 15 patients each were created from the patients: Group 1: Tetracycline fibres after SRP, Group 2: Chlorhexidine gel, Group 3: Probiotic mouthwash and Group 4: Rinse with regular saline. At baseline, oral prophylaxis was administered to all groups. Gingival index (GI), Plaque index (PI), and probing depth (PD), among other clinical indicators, were evaluated at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks, respectively. All clinical findings, along withPlaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), and Probing depth at various time intervals, decreased statistically significantly. Tetracycline fibres, Chlorhexidine gel, and probiotic mouthwash are all similarly effective for treating chronic periodontitis, but they are all more effective than SRP alone, according to an intergroup comparison. When it comes to SRP, local medication delivery methods are beneficial in treating periodontitis.
牙周袋可导致附着丧失进展。人们尝试了多种药物来改善牙周健康。因此,本研究旨在评估四环素纤维、益生菌和氯己定凝胶联合龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)治疗慢性牙周炎的效果。本研究共纳入60例年龄在25至35岁之间、患有广泛性慢性牙周炎且探诊袋深度(PPD)至少为5mm的患者。将患者分为四组,每组15人:第1组:SRP后使用四环素纤维;第2组:使用氯己定凝胶;第3组:使用益生菌漱口水;第4组:用生理盐水冲洗。在基线时,对所有组进行口腔预防。分别在基线、两周和四周时评估牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)和探诊深度(PD)等临床指标。所有临床指标,以及不同时间间隔的菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊深度,均有统计学显著下降。组间比较显示,四环素纤维、氯己定凝胶和益生菌漱口水在治疗慢性牙周炎方面同样有效,但它们都比单独的SRP更有效。对于SRP而言,局部给药方法有利于治疗牙周炎。