• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗决策支持系统用户界面的开发和专家评估。

Development and expert inspections of the user interface for a primary care decision support system.

机构信息

Goethe University Frankfurt, University Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Germany.

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of General Practice, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec;192:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105651. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105651
PMID:39413613
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practitioners play a unique key role in diagnosing patients with unclear diseases. Decision support systems in primary care can assist with diagnosis provided that they are efficient and user-friendly.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to develop a high-fidelity prototype of the user interface of a clinical decision support system for primary care, particularly for diagnosis support in unclear diseases, using expert inspections at an early stage of development to ensure a high level of usability.

METHODS

The user interface prototype was iteratively developed based on previous research, design principles, and usability guidelines. During the development phase, three usability inspections were carried out by all experts at four-week intervals as heuristic walkthrough. Each inspection consisted of two parts: 1) Task-based inspection 2) Free exploration and evaluation based on usability heuristics. Five domain experts assessed the current status of development. The tasks in the inspections were based on the task model derived in the requirements analysis: perform data entry, review and discuss results, schedule further diagnostics, refer to specialists and close case.

RESULTS

As a result of this iterative development, a high-fidelity, clickable user interface prototype was created that is able to fulfil all six tasks of our task model. The usability inspections identified a total of 196 usability issues (for all 3 inspections; Part 1: 90 issues, Part 2: 106 issues), ranging in severity from minor to severe. These served the continuous adjustment and improvement of the prototype. All main tasks were completed successfully despite these problems.

CONCLUSION

Usability inspections through heuristic walkthroughs can support and optimise the development of a user-centred decision support system in order to ensure its suitability for performing relevant tasks.

摘要

背景

全科医生在诊断不明疾病的患者方面发挥着独特的关键作用。只要决策支持系统在初级保健中是高效且用户友好的,它们就能帮助进行诊断。

目的

本研究的目的是使用早期开发阶段的专家检查来开发一种用于初级保健的临床决策支持系统的用户界面高保真原型,特别是用于支持诊断不明疾病,以确保高度的可用性。

方法

根据先前的研究、设计原则和可用性指南,迭代开发用户界面原型。在开发阶段,所有专家每隔四周进行三次可用性检查,作为启发式遍历。每次检查包括两部分:1)基于任务的检查,2)基于可用性启发式的自由探索和评估。五位领域专家评估了当前的开发状态。检查中的任务基于需求分析中得出的任务模型:执行数据输入、审查和讨论结果、安排进一步的诊断、转介给专家和关闭病例。

结果

通过这种迭代开发,创建了一个高保真、可点击的用户界面原型,能够完成我们任务模型的所有六个任务。可用性检查共确定了 196 个可用性问题(所有 3 次检查;第 1 部分:90 个问题,第 2 部分:106 个问题),严重程度从轻微到严重不等。这些问题用于不断调整和改进原型。尽管存在这些问题,但所有主要任务都成功完成。

结论

通过启发式遍历进行可用性检查可以支持和优化以用户为中心的决策支持系统的开发,以确保其适合执行相关任务。

相似文献

1
Development and expert inspections of the user interface for a primary care decision support system.基层医疗决策支持系统用户界面的开发和专家评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec;192:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105651. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Combined Expert and User-Driven Usability Assessment of Trauma Decision Support Systems Improves User-Centered Design.创伤决策支持系统的专家与用户联合驱动可用性评估改善了以用户为中心的设计。
Surgery. 2022 Nov;172(5):1537-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.037. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
3
Interface design recommendations for computerised clinical audit and feedback: Hybrid usability evidence from a research-led system.计算机化临床审计与反馈的界面设计建议:来自一个以研究为导向的系统的混合可用性证据。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:191-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
4
From an expert-driven paper guideline to a user-centred decision support system: a usability comparison study.从专家驱动的论文指南到以用户为中心的决策支持系统:一项可用性比较研究。
Artif Intell Med. 2013 Sep;59(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Multi-method laboratory user evaluation of an actionable clinical performance information system: Implications for usability and patient safety.多方法实验室用户对可操作临床绩效信息系统的评估:对可用性和患者安全的影响。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:62-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.床边护理临床决策支持系统的用户界面与工作流程设计评估
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jan 31;2(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2402.
7
Assessing the Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System: Heuristic Evaluation.评估临床决策支持系统的可用性:启发式评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 10;9(2):e31758. doi: 10.2196/31758.
8
Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.优化心脏康复电子病历数据录入模块的用户界面:一种混合方法可用性研究
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Teaching clinical reasoning and decision-making skills to nursing students: Design, development, and usability evaluation of a serious game.向护理专业学生传授临床推理与决策技能:一款严肃游戏的设计、开发与可用性评估
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Mobile Health for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Young Women During and After Pregnancy: User-Centered Design and Usability Study.孕期及产后弱势年轻女性戒烟的移动健康应用:以用户为中心的设计与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 4;5(8):e24112. doi: 10.2196/24112.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Prototype of a Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.评估基层医疗中临床决策支持系统的原型:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 20;9:e69875. doi: 10.2196/69875.