• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术治疗近端嵌顿性输尿管结石患者无石率和并发症的预测因素:基于新的评分标准。

Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients with proximal impacted ureteral stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: based on a new scoring standard.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 16;52(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01647-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01647-3
PMID:39414636
Abstract

To evaluate the predictive factors affecting the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) in the treatment of proximal impacted ureteral stones (PIUS) based on a new scoring standard. The data of 90 patients with PIUS were collected in this retrospective study between January 2015 and June 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors affecting treatment outcome in terms of SFR and complications. The scoring standard for patients with PIUS was developed based on the univariate logistic regression analyses. In the univariate analysis, stone density (P = 0.015), and stone diameter (P = 0.032) significantly were associated with lower SFR. And degree of hydronephrosis (P = 0.014), Preoperative infection (P = 0.002), and history of lithotripsy (P = 0.045) were associated with occurrence of complications. Multivariate analysis indicated that stone density (P = 0.020), and stone diameter (P < 0.001) were associated with lower SFR; independent risk factors for development of complications were history of lithotripsy (P = 0.024), and preoperative infection (P < 0.001). Additionally, score ≥ 3 was the independent risk factor for both SFR (P < 0.001) and complication rate (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis shown that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate (P = 0.032) and complications (P = 0.015). According to the findings of this study, the stone score ≥ 3 was determined as a critical predictive factor of SFR and complications in PIUS patients undergoing PCN based on a new scoring standard. Additionally, PCN has high initial SFR and low complications when dealing with score < 3 PIUS.

摘要

基于新的评分标准,评估影响经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)治疗近端嵌顿输尿管结石(PIUS)患者无石率(SFR)和并发症的预测因素。本回顾性研究收集了 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月间 90 例 PIUS 患者的数据。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定影响 SFR 和并发症的治疗结果的因素。基于单因素逻辑回归分析,为 PIUS 患者制定评分标准。在单因素分析中,结石密度(P=0.015)和结石直径(P=0.032)与较低的 SFR 显著相关。而肾积水程度(P=0.014)、术前感染(P=0.002)和碎石史(P=0.045)与并发症的发生相关。多因素分析表明,结石密度(P=0.020)和结石直径(P<0.001)与较低的 SFR 相关;发生并发症的独立危险因素是碎石史(P=0.024)和术前感染(P<0.001)。此外,评分≥3 是 SFR(P<0.001)和并发症发生率(P<0.001)的独立危险因素。亚组分析表明,两组在无石率(P=0.032)和并发症发生率(P=0.015)方面存在统计学差异。根据本研究的结果,基于新的评分标准,结石评分≥3 被确定为 PCNL 治疗 PIUS 患者 SFR 和并发症的关键预测因素。此外,当处理评分<3 的 PIUS 时,PCN 具有较高的初始 SFR 和较低的并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients with proximal impacted ureteral stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: based on a new scoring standard.经皮肾镜取石术治疗近端嵌顿性输尿管结石患者无石率和并发症的预测因素:基于新的评分标准。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 16;52(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01647-3.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal impacted ureter stones based on a new scoring standard: a bicentric matched-pair analysis.基于新评分标准评估输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端嵌顿性输尿管结石的疗效:一项双中心配对分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2833-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04556-z. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Complicated Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi Based on a New Scoring Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis.基于新评分标准对复杂嵌顿性近端输尿管结石不同手术方法疗效的比较:配对分析
J Endourol. 2023 Apr;37(4):462-466. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0669. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
Validation of stone-kidney size score to predict outcome and complications of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.验证结石-肾脏大小评分以预测小儿经皮肾镜取石术的结局和并发症。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1026-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia.局部浸润麻醉下微创经皮肾镜取石术患者无石率和并发症的预测因素。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2637-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03070-5. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.微通道与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:一项对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输尿管镜碎石术与腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术或经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型近端输尿管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析
Urol Int. 2017;99(3):308-319. doi: 10.1159/000471773. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteral lithotripsy, which one is better for patients with upper ureteral calculi of 1.5-2.0 cm in diameter.经皮肾镜碎石术或输尿管软镜碎石术,对于直径为 1.5-2.0cm 的上尿路结石患者,哪一种更好。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01480-1.
9
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of antegrade minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper ureteral impacted stones: a retrospective cohort study.顺行微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石的疗效及安全性比较评估:一项回顾性队列研究
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Mar 28;97(1):13336. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.13336.
10
A prospective comparative evaluation of preoperative stone scoring systems with respect to stone free rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术术前结石评分系统与结石清除率及并发症的前瞻性对比评估。
Urologia. 2023 Aug;90(3):527-534. doi: 10.1177/03915603221141170. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effects of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteral impacted stones with infection.微创经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石合并感染患者的疗效比较
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Aug 30;14(8):2375-2382. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-277. Epub 2025 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management.国际尿石症联盟(IAU)鹿角结石管理指南。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 25;42(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6.
2
Risk factors of high fluid absorption in patients treated with mini-PCNL: a single-center prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗患者高液体吸收的危险因素:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 2;42(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04835-3.
3
PCNL vs. two staged RIRS for kidney stones greater than 20 mm: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
经皮肾镜碎石术与两阶段输尿管软镜碎石术治疗大于 20mm 肾结石的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Feb;76(1):31-41. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05577-5.
4
Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update.肾结石的泌尿外科指南:概述与全面更新
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 16;13(4):1114. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041114.
5
Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis.结石分类学的进展:揭示尿石症的美丽。
World J Urol. 2024 Jan 20;42(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04746-9.
6
A comparison of S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system, Guy's stone score, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) in predicting mini-PCNL stone-free rate.比较 S.T.O.N.E 肾结石评分系统、Guy 结石评分和首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分(S-ReSC)在预测微创经皮肾镜取石术结石清除率方面的作用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jan 5;52(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01499-3.
7
Effect of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on postoperative infection after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with negative urine culture: a single-center randomized controlled trial.术前预防性使用抗生素对尿培养阴性的经皮肾镜取石术后感染的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3687-3693. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04623-5. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
8
Prevalence of urolithiasis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国尿石症的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2024 Jan;133(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.16179. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal impacted ureter stones based on a new scoring standard: a bicentric matched-pair analysis.基于新评分标准评估输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端嵌顿性输尿管结石的疗效:一项双中心配对分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2833-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04556-z. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
10
Suction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, Development, and Outcomes from Experimental and Clinical studies. Results from a Systematic Review.经皮肾镜碎石术中的吸引:来自实验和临床研究的演变、发展和结果。系统评价的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jan;10(1):154-168. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jul 11.