Batool Kishwar, Mehmood Mariam, Jafar Muneeb, Gull Maham
Kishwar Batool, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Mariam Mehmood, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2080-2084. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.8517.
To compare the effects of the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and the Bowen Technique on hamstring muscle tightness in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients.
A randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed study in which 62 participants were recruited through the purposive sampling technique were divided into two groups by the lottery method. Subjects who had pain for more than six months in the back and hamstring tightness were included. The duration of the study was four months from February to May 2023 conducted at Madinah Teaching Hospital Faisalabad. Subjects in Group-A were given the Bowen technique, whereas subjects in Group-B were given the MET. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and active knee extension (AKE) tests were used for measurements of outcomes.
Intra-group comparison by using Friedman test revealed that both Group-A & B subject's pain were reduced (P<0.000), their tightness in back thigh muscles were significantly reduced (P<0.000) and functional activities of subjects were also improved (P<0.000). Mann Whitney test was used to determine the between group comparison. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant. Inter Group-Analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between effects of Bowen technique & MET on pain, hamstring tightness and disability as both techniques improved pain, flexibility & disability.
This study revealed that both groups treated by MET and Bowen Technique had significantly reduced pain, improved flexibility of back thigh muscle and reduced functional disability.
比较肌肉能量技术(MET)和鲍恩技术对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者腘绳肌紧张度的影响。
一项采用随机临床试验(RCT)设计的研究,通过目的抽样技术招募了62名参与者,并通过抽签法将其分为两组。纳入背部疼痛超过六个月且腘绳肌紧张的受试者。该研究于2023年2月至5月在费萨拉巴德麦地那教学医院进行,为期四个月。A组受试者接受鲍恩技术治疗,而B组受试者接受MET治疗。采用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)和主动膝关节伸展(AKE)测试来测量结果。
使用弗里德曼检验进行组内比较显示,A组和B组受试者的疼痛均减轻(P<0.000),大腿后侧肌肉紧张度显著降低(P<0.000),受试者的功能活动也得到改善(P<0.000)。采用曼-惠特尼检验进行组间比较。P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。组间分析显示,鲍恩技术和MET对疼痛、腘绳肌紧张度和功能障碍的影响之间没有统计学显著差异,因为两种技术都改善了疼痛、灵活性和功能障碍。
本研究表明,接受MET和鲍恩技术治疗的两组患者疼痛均显著减轻,大腿后侧肌肉灵活性提高,功能障碍减少。