• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹。

Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery.

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084
PMID:39417641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11483578/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited.

METHODS

A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated.

RESULTS

The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.

摘要

背景

气候变化对全球健康构成重大威胁,医疗保健(包括外科手术)是温室气体排放的主要来源之一。人们已经努力在外科手术中推广可持续性,但关于整形外科学可持续性的文献仍然有限。

方法

本研究采用生命周期分析方法评估和量化非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术中三种不同重建方法(直接缝合、刃厚皮片移植和全厚皮片移植)相关的环境排放。分析于 2023 年 3 月在英国斯旺西莫尔森顿医院进行。然后,估算了英格兰和威尔士非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹。

结果

非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的平均碳排放量为 29.82 至 34.31 kgCO₂eq。手术室能源消耗(4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq)和消耗品(16.87 kgCO₂eq)是主要贡献者。非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术产生的废物占 1.31 kgCO₂eq,可重复使用手术器械的消毒产生 1.92 kgCO₂eq 的碳排放。同时,运输、敷料、药品和洗衣分别占 0.57、2.65、1.85 和 0.38 kgCO₂eq。与使用刃厚皮片移植(43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq)和全厚皮片移植(31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq)相比,直接缝合切除非黑素瘤皮肤癌导致的碳排放量最低(19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq)。2021 年,据估计,威尔士非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的年碳足迹为 306775 kgCO₂eq,英格兰为 4402650 kgCO₂eq。可以预测,到 2035 年,非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术产生的碳排放将占威尔士的 388927 kgCO₂eq 和英格兰的 5419770 kgCO₂eq。

结论

本研究强调了整形外科学中非黑素瘤皮肤癌的环境影响,强调了需要采取可持续实践。外科医生和政策制定者之间的合作至关重要,建议进一步收集数据以进行更好的分析。

相似文献

1
Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery.非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084.
2
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Carbon footprint of Nepalese healthcare system: A study of Dhulikhel Hospital.尼泊尔医疗体系的碳足迹:对杜利凯尔医院的研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 5;12:1366. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.139552.1. eCollection 2023.
4
The carbon footprint of a renal service in the United Kingdom.英国肾脏服务的碳足迹。
QJM. 2010 Dec;103(12):965-75. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq150. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
The carbon footprint of an Australian satellite haemodialysis unit.澳大利亚卫星血液透析单元的碳足迹。
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):369-74. doi: 10.1071/AH13022.
7
Does Reusable Instrumentation for Four-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Offer Decreased Waste Disposal Costs and Lower Waste-Related Carbon Emissions?四锚旋转肩袖修复的可重复使用器械是否降低了废物处理成本和与废物相关的碳排放?
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug 1;32(15):705-711. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00200. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
Handling 'carbon footprint' in orthopaedics.处理骨科中的“碳足迹”。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Jul;106(6):498-503. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0052. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Sources of Variation in the Carbon Footprint of Hemodialysis Treatment.血液透析治疗碳足迹的变化来源。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep;33(9):1790-1795. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010086. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
10
Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia.评估固体废弃物处理和处置技术的碳足迹排放和环境问题;以马来西亚为例。
Waste Manag. 2017 Dec;70:282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing the carbon footprint in carpal tunnel surgery inside the operating room with a lean and green model: a comparative study.在手术室中采用精益和绿色模式减少腕管综合征手术的碳足迹:一项比较研究。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Nov;48(10):1022-1029. doi: 10.1177/17531934231176952. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries.在全球范围内减少手术对环境的影响:对 132 个国家的医疗工作者进行系统评价和共同优先排序。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jun 12;110(7):804-817. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad092.
3
The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes.
五种常见手术中使用的产品的碳足迹:确定相关产品和流程。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Jun;116(6):199-213. doi: 10.1177/01410768231166135. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
Revising a laparoscopic appendicectomy set to reduce reliance on disposable surgical instruments: supporting the transition to sustainable surgical practice.修订腹腔镜阑尾切除术设置以减少对一次性手术器械的依赖:支持向可持续手术实践的转变。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Feb;106(2):167-172. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0015. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Spain.西班牙白内障手术的碳足迹。
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2023 May;98(5):249-253. doi: 10.1016/j.oftale.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Validating a novel natural language processing pathway for automated quality assurance in surgical oncology: incomplete excision rates of 34 955 basal cell carcinomas.验证一种用于外科肿瘤学自动质量保证的新型自然语言处理途径:34955例基底细胞癌的切除不完全率
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1072-1075. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad055.
7
The epidemiology, healthcare and societal burden of basal cell carcinoma in Wales 2000-2018: a retrospective nationwide analysis.2000 - 2018年威尔士基底细胞癌的流行病学、医疗保健及社会负担:一项全国性回顾分析
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):380-389. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac090.
8
One step forward to sustainability: The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Australia.迈向可持续发展的一步:澳大利亚白内障手术的碳足迹
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;51(2):180-182. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14193. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
9
Prospective Dynamic and Probabilistic Material Flow Analysis of Graphene-Based Materials in Europe from 2004 to 2030.2004 年至 2030 年欧洲基于石墨烯的材料的前瞻性动态和概率性物质流分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 4;56(19):13798-13809. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04002. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
10
Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review.机器人和腹腔镜手术中的环境可持续性:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):921-932. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac191.