• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在手术室中采用精益和绿色模式减少腕管综合征手术的碳足迹:一项比较研究。

Reducing the carbon footprint in carpal tunnel surgery inside the operating room with a lean and green model: a comparative study.

机构信息

Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK.

Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Nov;48(10):1022-1029. doi: 10.1177/17531934231176952. Epub 2023 May 24.

DOI:10.1177/17531934231176952
PMID:37226468
Abstract

The primary aim of our study was to assess the environmental impact of moving from a standard to a lean and green model for a carpal tunnel decompression. We objectively measured the clinical waste generated, the number of single use items and the number of sterile instruments required for a standard procedure, and then moved to smaller instrument trays, smaller drapes and fewer disposables. These two models were compared for waste generation, financial costs and carbon footprint. Information prospectively collected on seven patients in the standard model and 103 patients in the lean and green model in two hospitals over a 15-month period, demonstrated a reduction in CO emissions of 80%, clinical waste reduction of 65%, and an average aggregate cost saving of 66%. The lean and green model can deliver a safe, efficient, cost-effective and sustainable service for patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression. III.

摘要

我们研究的主要目的是评估从标准模型转变为精益和绿色模型对腕管减压的环境影响。我们客观地测量了标准手术产生的临床废物、一次性用品的数量和所需的无菌器械的数量,然后使用更小的器械托盘、更小的手术巾单和更少的一次性用品。这两种模型在废物产生、财务成本和碳足迹方面进行了比较。在 15 个月的时间里,在两家医院的 7 名标准模型患者和 103 名精益和绿色模型患者身上前瞻性地收集信息,结果显示 CO 排放量减少了 80%,临床废物减少了 65%,平均综合成本节省了 66%。精益和绿色模型可以为接受腕管减压的患者提供安全、高效、具有成本效益和可持续的服务。III.

相似文献

1
Reducing the carbon footprint in carpal tunnel surgery inside the operating room with a lean and green model: a comparative study.在手术室中采用精益和绿色模式减少腕管综合征手术的碳足迹:一项比较研究。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Nov;48(10):1022-1029. doi: 10.1177/17531934231176952. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Carbon Footprint of Open Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed in the Procedure Room Versus Operating Room Setting.在手术室内与手术室环境下进行开放式腕管松解术的碳足迹比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Jun;49(6):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Direct Cost Comparison of Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Different Venues.不同场所开放式腕管松解术的直接成本比较
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):462-465. doi: 10.1177/1558944718755476. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Carpal tunnel decompression in primary care: what is the infection risk and is it safe and effective?基层医疗中的腕管减压术:感染风险是多少?它是否安全有效?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):353-356. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0036.
5
The Environmental Impact of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.开放式与内镜下腕管松解术的环境影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jan;48(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Carpal tunnel syndrome, the search for a cost-effective surgical intervention: a randomised controlled trial.腕管综合征:寻找具有成本效益的手术干预措施——一项随机对照试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Jan;87(1):36-40. doi: 10.1308/1478708051469.
7
Our Surgical Experience: Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Surgery.我们的手术经验:开放式与内镜下腕管手术
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Sep;43(9):853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Utilization of Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Analysis of National Practice Patterns.术前电诊断研究在腕管综合征中的应用:全国实践模式分析。
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jun;41(6):665-672.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
9
The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes.五种常见手术中使用的产品的碳足迹:确定相关产品和流程。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Jun;116(6):199-213. doi: 10.1177/01410768231166135. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
10
Carpal tunnel release: transverse or longitudinal limited-incisions?腕管松解术:横向还是纵向有限切口?
Clin Ter. 2015;166(3):e158-64. doi: 10.7417/CT.2015.1847.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon Footprint of Minimally Invasive and Open Microdiscectomy: Emerging Implications.微创与开放显微椎间盘切除术的碳足迹:新出现的影响
Global Spine J. 2025 Sep 4:21925682251371597. doi: 10.1177/21925682251371597.
2
Reducing surgical instrument usage: systematic review of approaches for tray optimization and its advantages on environmental impact, costs and efficiency.减少手术器械使用:托盘优化方法及其对环境影响、成本和效率优势的系统评价
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf030.
3
The Carbon Footprint of Hospital Services and Care Pathways: A State-of-the-Science Review.
医院服务与护理路径的碳足迹:科学现状综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Dec;132(12):126002. doi: 10.1289/EHP14754. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
4
Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery.非黑素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084.
5
What Is the Carbon Footprint of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?成人脊柱畸形手术的碳足迹是多少?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 26;13(13):3731. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133731.
6
Carbon Footprint of Minor Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.足部和踝关节小手术的碳足迹:一项随机对照试验
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):24730114241238231. doi: 10.1177/24730114241238231. eCollection 2024 Jan.