• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化驾驶中的感知风险:一种用于避障的蒙特卡洛方法。

Quantifying perceived risk in driving: A Monte Carlo approach for obstacle avoidance.

作者信息

Yang Zhen, Gong Zhe, Qin Yimei, Zheng Ruiping

机构信息

The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(3):291-299. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647
PMID:39417752
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a model for quantifying perceived risk in obstacle avoidance, emphasizing how drivers' perceived risk characteristics influence their driving decisions. The research addresses the lack of attention given to modeling risk from the perspective of drivers' risk perceptions.

METHODS

Monte Carlo methods are employed to account for the uncertainties and complexities of driving behavior, restoring the probabilistic nature of risk. The proposed method quantifies perceived risk by incorporating drivers' fuzzy perceptions, enabling a quantitative evaluation during obstacle avoidance. A logit model is used to link perceived risk with driving decisions, identifying key factors influencing driver behavior in obstacle avoidance scenarios.

RESULTS

Experimental data revealed significant variations in vehicle trajectories and speed distributions due to differences in drivers' experience and proficiency. The perceived risk indicator (PRI) values for leftward bypasses were higher compared to rightward bypasses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the PRI's strong predictive ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820. The logit model showed that both PRI and speed significantly influenced the probability of choosing a rightward bypass, achieving 90% accuracy. Building on the model, the study predicted and visualized the probability of vehicles turning right to avoid obstacles at different positions and speeds within 200 m of the obstacle.

CONCLUSIONS

The research offers a framework for traffic professionals to understand driver-perceived risk and decision-making mechanisms. This understanding is beneficial for improving traffic safety and highlights the importance of considering drivers' risk perceptions in modeling driving behavior.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种用于量化避障过程中感知风险的模型,重点关注驾驶员的感知风险特征如何影响其驾驶决策。该研究解决了从驾驶员风险感知角度对风险建模缺乏关注的问题。

方法

采用蒙特卡罗方法来考虑驾驶行为的不确定性和复杂性,恢复风险的概率性质。所提出的方法通过纳入驾驶员的模糊感知来量化感知风险,从而在避障过程中实现定量评估。使用逻辑回归模型将感知风险与驾驶决策联系起来,确定在避障场景中影响驾驶员行为的关键因素。

结果

实验数据显示,由于驾驶员经验和熟练程度的差异,车辆轨迹和速度分布存在显著变化。向左绕行的感知风险指标(PRI)值高于向右绕行,接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线证实了PRI具有较强的预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.820。逻辑回归模型表明,PRI和速度均显著影响选择向右绕行的概率,准确率达到90%。基于该模型,研究预测并可视化了车辆在距障碍物200米内不同位置和速度下右转避障的概率。

结论

该研究为交通专业人员理解驾驶员感知风险和决策机制提供了一个框架。这种理解有助于提高交通安全,并突出了在驾驶行为建模中考虑驾驶员风险感知的重要性。

相似文献

1
Quantifying perceived risk in driving: A Monte Carlo approach for obstacle avoidance.量化驾驶中的感知风险:一种用于避障的蒙特卡洛方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(3):291-299. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What makes drivers slow down in work zones?工人风险或车辆损坏:是什么让司机在工作区减速?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):177-181. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1878354. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
How do drivers perceive collision risk? A quantitative exploration in generalized two-dimensional scenarios.驾驶员如何感知碰撞风险?广义二维场景下的定量探索。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107879. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107879. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Strategic crossing decisions in vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections: A networked driving simulator study.无控制交叉口车辆交互中的战略穿越决策:一项联网驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Jun;215:107990. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.107990. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
5
Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways.量化驾驶员的视觉感知,分析双车道山区公路事故多发地段。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
6
Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.量化视觉道路环境以建立超速预测模型:使用自然驾驶数据的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.SHRP2 追尾碰撞和险象追尾中的转向或制动回避反应:决策树方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106055. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106055. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
8
How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?交叉视野如何影响紧急情况下的驾驶安全?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:162-175. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
9
Investigating factors influencing drivers' speed selection behavior under reduced visibility conditions.研究在能见度降低条件下影响驾驶员速度选择行为的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Jul 4;19(5):488-494. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1453134. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Logit-Based Analysis of Drivers' Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Intersections in China.基于对数单位模型的中国无信号交叉口驾驶员穿越行为分析
Hum Factors. 2015 Nov;57(7):1101-14. doi: 10.1177/0018720815592097. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Collision risk analysis in the merging area of interchanges using Monte Carlo traffic simulation.使用蒙特卡洛交通模拟对互通式立交合流区域的碰撞风险分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0330224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330224. eCollection 2025.