Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Albacete, Neurophysiology & Behavior Lab, Institute of Biomedicine (IB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.
Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of Ciudad Real, Neurophysiology & Behavior Lab, Institute of Biomedicine (IB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 17;14(1):24344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75632-6.
COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, has raised significant interest in understanding potential cross-immunity mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests that T-cells associated with common cold coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1) may provide some level of cross-immunity against SARS-CoV-2. It is also known that the prevalence of smokers among patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19 is lower than expected according to the corresponding country's smoking prevalence, which is known as smoker's paradox in COVID-19. No clear consensus to explain it has yet been reached. This phenomenon suggests a complex interaction between smoking and immune response. Nonetheless, very few works have studied the prevalence of smokers in those infected by common cold coronaviruses, and its relation to COVID-19 has not been investigated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the prevalence of smokers among patients infected by common cold coronaviruses, and to compare them to the corresponding country's smoking prevalence. L'Abbé plots were used to visually assess the consistency of the observed effects across the different studies included in the meta-analysis. Additionally, significant differences were found in smoking prevalence among the various types of ccCoV, indicating the need for further research into the biological mechanisms driving these disparities. The results show that smoking prevalence is higher among those patients infected by these coronaviruses than in the general population (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.81-2.33). A study was separately done for the four coronavirus types, and the prevalence of smokers was higher in three of the four than that corresponding to country, gender and study year: OC43 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.64-5.82); HKU1 (OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 1.21-10.85); NL63 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.64-5.82); 229E (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.50-1.90). The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Chi-squared test, I-squared (I2), and Tau-squared (τ2). This detailed statistical analysis enhances the robustness of our findings and highlights the variations in smoking prevalence among different ccCoVs. Our data suggest that COVID-19 might be less prevalent among smokers due to greater cross-immunity from a larger number or more recent infections by common cold coronaviruses than the non-smoking population, which would explain smoker's paradox in COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS. The low prevalence of current smokers among SARS-CoV-2 patients is a finding recurrently repeated, even leading to postulate the "smoker's paradox" in COVID-19. This fact compelled us to study the prevalence of smokers among patients infected by common cold coronaviruses, and to compare them to the corresponding country's smoking prevalence. Our data could explain smoker's paradox in COVID-19 by a greater cross immunity due to a larger number, or more recent infections by common cold coronaviruses than the non-smoking population. This manuscript allow understand potential unrevealed mechanism for low prevalence of current smokers among SARS-CoV-2 patients.
新型 SARS-CoV-2 病毒引发的 COVID-19 大流行引发了人们对潜在交叉免疫机制的浓厚兴趣。最近的证据表明,与普通感冒冠状病毒(229E、NL63、OC43、HKU1)相关的 T 细胞可能提供了一定程度的针对 SARS-CoV-2 的交叉免疫。此外,已知 COVID-19 住院患者中吸烟者的比例低于相应国家的吸烟流行率,这在 COVID-19 中被称为吸烟者悖论。目前尚未达成明确共识来解释这一现象。这一现象表明吸烟与免疫反应之间存在复杂的相互作用。然而,很少有研究关注感染普通感冒冠状病毒的患者中的吸烟者比例,以及其与 COVID-19 的关系。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究感染普通感冒冠状病毒的患者中的吸烟者比例,并将其与相应国家的吸烟流行率进行比较。L'Abbé 图用于直观评估荟萃分析中纳入的不同研究中观察到的效应的一致性。此外,不同类型的 ccCoV 之间的吸烟率存在显著差异,表明需要进一步研究驱动这些差异的生物学机制。结果表明,感染这些冠状病毒的患者中的吸烟率高于普通人群(OR=1.37,95%CI:0.81-2.33)。对四种冠状病毒类型分别进行了一项研究,其中三种冠状病毒类型的吸烟者比例高于相应国家、性别和研究年份的比例:OC43(OR=1.93,95%CI:0.64-5.82);HKU1(OR=3.62,95%CI:1.21-10.85);NL63(OR=1.93,95%CI:0.64-5.82);229E(OR=0.97,95%CI:0.50-1.90)。使用 Cochrane Chi-squared 检验、I 平方(I2)和 Tau 平方(τ2)评估研究的异质性。这种详细的统计分析增强了我们研究结果的稳健性,并突出了不同 ccCoV 之间吸烟率的差异。我们的数据表明,由于感染普通感冒冠状病毒的次数较多或较近,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的吸烟者的交叉免疫程度可能更高,因此 COVID-19 的发病率可能低于不吸烟者,这可以解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论。意义。SARS-CoV-2 患者中当前吸烟者的低流行率是一个反复出现的发现,甚至导致提出 COVID-19 中的“吸烟者悖论”。这一事实促使我们研究感染普通感冒冠状病毒的患者中的吸烟者比例,并将其与相应国家的吸烟流行率进行比较。我们的数据可以通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。本文通过更大数量或更近期的普通感冒冠状病毒感染来解释 COVID-19 中的吸烟者悖论,这与非吸烟者相比,交叉免疫程度更高。