Suppr超能文献

中枢神经系统感染病原体检测方法的比较研究:结核性脑膜炎的实验室检测。

Comparative study of pathogen detection methods for central nervous system infections: laboratory testing of tuberculous meningitis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518112, China.

Three Departments of Lung Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518112, China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 17;24(1):1172. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10037-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a severe central nervous system (CNS) infection with a challenging diagnosis due to inadequate detection methods. This study evaluated current clinical detection methods and their applicability.

METHODS

A cohort of 514 CNS infection patients from 2018 to 2020 was studied. Data on general demographics, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) analysis, epidemiology, and clinical outcomes were collected. TBM patients were identified, and the sensitivities of mmetagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS), GeneXpert, and microbial culture were compared. Kappa statistic assessed the consistency between methods.

RESULTS

Among the patients involved, TBM (29%) and neurosyphilis (25%) were the two most prevalent CNS infections. CSF analysis indicated that 76% of patients had leukocytosis, suggesting a potential CNS inflammation. In TBM cases, 92.5% had elevated CSF protein and leukocyte counts. Moreover, the percentage of positive mNGS results was 55.6%. GeneXpert and MTB cultures alone had lower sensitivity, but combined use resulted in a 53.4% positive rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the high sensitivity of mNGS, comparable to GeneXpert and MTB culture. The combined methods are cost-effective and straightforward, and can partially substitute for mNGS, offering valuable alternatives for TBM diagnosis and providing insights into multiple diagnostic strategies in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

结核性脑膜炎(TBM)是一种严重的中枢神经系统(CNS)感染,由于检测方法不足,诊断具有挑战性。本研究评估了当前的临床检测方法及其适用性。

方法

研究了 2018 年至 2020 年期间的 514 例中枢神经系统感染患者队列。收集了一般人口统计学、脑脊液(CSF)分析、流行病学和临床结果的数据。确定了 TBM 患者,并比较了宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)、GeneXpert 和微生物培养的敏感性。Kappa 统计评估了方法之间的一致性。

结果

在所涉及的患者中,TBM(29%)和神经梅毒(25%)是两种最常见的中枢神经系统感染。CSF 分析表明,76%的患者白细胞增多,提示潜在的中枢神经系统炎症。在 TBM 病例中,92.5%的患者 CSF 蛋白和白细胞计数升高。此外,mNGS 结果阳性率为 55.6%。GeneXpert 和 MTB 培养单独使用的敏感性较低,但联合使用的阳性率为 53.4%。

结论

本研究强调了 mNGS 的高敏感性,与 GeneXpert 和 MTB 培养相当。联合方法具有成本效益且简单易行,可以部分替代 mNGS,为 TBM 诊断提供有价值的替代方案,并为临床实践中的多种诊断策略提供了思路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069b/11488244/5fa23a8c0823/12879_2024_10037_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验