Reilly Erin E, Gorrell Sasha, Duffy Alan, Blalock Dan V, Mehler Philip, Brandt Harry, McClanahan Susan, Zucker Kianna, Lynch Naomi, Singh Simar, Drury Catherine R, Le Grange Daniel, Rienecke Renee D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eating Recovery Center/Pathlight Mood & Anxiety Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Oct 17;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00819-8.
Despite widespread use of higher levels of care in treating eating disorders in adolescents, research supporting the use of these treatments remains limited by small sample sizes and a predominant focus on anorexia nervosa. Further, existing data regarding predictors of outcome have yielded mixed findings. In the current study, we evaluated treatment outcomes and predictors of outcome among a large sample of adolescents with eating disorders presenting to inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization programs, and intensive outpatient programs across the United States.
Adolescents (N = 1,971) completed self-report measures of eating disorder symptoms, depression, and anxiety at treatment admission, stepdown, and discharge. Using linear mixed effect models, we evaluated changes in symptoms over treatment separately among youth admitted to inpatient/residential treatment and those admitted to partial hospitalization/intensive outpatient programs, and used established metrics to gauge frequency of reliable (i.e., statistically reliable) and clinically significant change.
Results suggested decreases in eating disorder symptoms, depression, and anxiety from intake to discharge. Around 50% of the sample reported reliable decreases in eating disorder symptoms at stepdown and discharge, with 30% of the sample reporting reliable reductions in depression and anxiety. Psychiatric comorbidity, primary diagnosis, age, and eating disorder symptoms at admission consistently predicted treatment-related change, although patterns in findings varied across symptoms.
Data from our sample are consistent with past work suggesting that adolescents enrolled in higher levels of care report clinical benefit; however, these effects are heterogenous, and a significant portion of individuals may not report reliable change in symptoms. Ultimately, ongoing work is required to better understand how and for whom higher levels of care may achieve their benefit and to identify the optimal approach for improving outcomes for adolescents with eating disorders.
尽管在治疗青少年饮食失调症时广泛采用了更高水平的护理,但支持使用这些治疗方法的研究仍然受到样本量小以及主要关注神经性厌食症的限制。此外,关于治疗结果预测因素的现有数据得出了不一致的结果。在本研究中,我们评估了美国各地住院、寄宿、部分住院治疗项目和强化门诊治疗项目中大量饮食失调青少年样本的治疗结果和结果预测因素。
青少年(N = 1971)在治疗入院、逐步降级和出院时完成了饮食失调症状、抑郁和焦虑的自我报告测量。我们使用线性混合效应模型,分别评估了住院/寄宿治疗的青少年和部分住院/强化门诊治疗项目的青少年在治疗过程中症状的变化,并使用既定指标来衡量可靠(即统计学上可靠)和临床上显著变化的频率。
结果表明,从入院到出院,饮食失调症状、抑郁和焦虑有所减轻。约50%的样本报告在逐步降级和出院时饮食失调症状有可靠的减轻,30%的样本报告抑郁和焦虑有可靠的减轻。精神病共病、主要诊断、年龄和入院时的饮食失调症状始终预测与治疗相关的变化,尽管不同症状的研究结果模式有所不同。
我们样本的数据与过去的研究结果一致,表明接受更高水平护理的青少年报告有临床益处;然而,这些效果是异质性的,很大一部分个体可能没有报告症状的可靠变化。最终,需要持续开展工作,以更好地了解更高水平的护理如何以及对谁可能实现其益处,并确定改善饮食失调青少年治疗结果的最佳方法。