• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建首发精神病服务参与度的频谱模型:超越出勤率

Developing a spectrum model of engagement in services for first episode psychosis: beyond attendance.

作者信息

Ferrari M, MacDonald K, Sabetti J, Cowan T, Iyer S N

机构信息

Douglas Research Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 3;15:1429135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429135. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429135
PMID:39421063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early intervention services (EIS) for psychosis have proven highly effective in treating first episode psychosis. Yet, retention or "engagement" in EIS remains highly variable. Dis/engagement as a contested concept and fluid process involving relationships between service providers and service users remains poorly understood. This study aimed to critically evaluate and explain the dynamic interplay of service provider-user relationships in effecting dis/engagement from an early intervention program for psychosis.

METHODS

Forty study participants, 16 service providers and 24 service users (19 current and 5 disengaged) from a Canadian EIS program, were administered semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was conducted using grounded theory methods, with findings captured and reconceptualized in a novel explanatory model.

FINDINGS

A model of engagement with eight major domains of engagement in EIS positioned along a control-autonomy spectrum was developed from the findings, with Clinical engagement (attendance) and Life engagement (life activities) at opposite ends of the spectrum, interspersed by six intermediate domains: Medication/treatment, Symptoms/illness, Mental health, Physical health/wellness, Communication, and Relationships, each domain bearing uniquely on engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

An examination of service user and service provider perspectives on the various domains identified in the spectrum model, and their dynamic interplay, reveals the complexity of choices faced by service users in engaging and not engaging with services.

摘要

背景

精神病早期干预服务(EIS)已被证明在治疗首发精神病方面非常有效。然而,EIS中的留存率或“参与度”仍然差异很大。作为一个有争议的概念和涉及服务提供者与服务使用者之间关系的动态过程,脱离/参与的情况仍未得到充分理解。本研究旨在批判性地评估和解释服务提供者与使用者关系在影响精神病早期干预项目中的脱离/参与方面的动态相互作用。

方法

对来自加拿大一个EIS项目的40名研究参与者(16名服务提供者和24名服务使用者,其中19名是当前参与的,5名是已脱离的)进行了半结构化访谈。采用扎根理论方法进行定性分析,并在一个新颖的解释模型中捕捉和重新概念化研究结果。

结果

根据研究结果,开发了一个参与模型,该模型沿着控制-自主光谱定位了EIS中参与的八个主要领域,临床参与(出勤)和生活参与(生活活动)位于光谱的两端,中间穿插着六个中间领域:药物治疗/治疗、症状/疾病、心理健康、身体健康/健康、沟通和关系,每个领域对参与都有独特的影响。

结论

对服务使用者和服务提供者对光谱模型中确定的各个领域的看法及其动态相互作用的考察,揭示了服务使用者在参与和不参与服务时面临的选择的复杂性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c41/11484078/45cb7b2851f0/fpsyt-15-1429135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c41/11484078/45cb7b2851f0/fpsyt-15-1429135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c41/11484078/45cb7b2851f0/fpsyt-15-1429135-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a spectrum model of engagement in services for first episode psychosis: beyond attendance.构建首发精神病服务参与度的频谱模型:超越出勤率
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 3;15:1429135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1429135. eCollection 2024.
2
Engagement in specialized early intervention services for psychosis as an interplay between personal agency and critical structures: A qualitative study.参与精神病的专业化早期干预服务:个人能动性与关键结构的相互作用:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Aug;108:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103583. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
3
Disengagement Processes Within an Early Intervention Service for First-Episode Psychosis: A Longitudinal, Qualitative, Multi-Perspective Study.首发精神病早期干预服务中的脱离过程:一项纵向、定性、多视角研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 12;11:565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00565. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluation of a community awareness programme to reduce delays in referrals to early intervention services and enhance early detection of psychosis.一项旨在减少转介至早期干预服务的延迟并加强精神病早期检测的社区意识计划的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 2;15:98. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0485-y.
5
Moving on from early intervention for psychosis services: Service user perspectives on the facilitators and barriers of transition.从精神病早期干预服务转移:服务使用者对过渡促进因素和障碍的看法。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;13(6):1396-1403. doi: 10.1111/eip.12780. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Exploring service provider perspectives on service user engagement across service components in coordinated specialty care programs for psychosis.探索服务提供者对于精神疾病综合专科护理项目中跨服务组件的服务使用者参与情况的看法。
Psychol Serv. 2024 Aug;21(3):399-405. doi: 10.1037/ser0000844. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
7
The rates and determinants of disengagement and subsequent re-engagement in young people with first-episode psychosis.首发精神病青年中断和随后重新参与的比率和决定因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;54(8):945-953. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01698-7. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Mental health provider perspectives of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on service delivery: a focus on challenges in remote engagement, suicide risk assessment, and treatment of psychosis.心理健康服务提供者对 COVID-19 大流行对服务提供影响的看法:重点关注远程服务、自杀风险评估和精神分裂症治疗方面的挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 31;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08106-y.
9
The missing voice of engagement: an exploratory study from the perspectives of case-managers at an early intervention service for first-episode psychosis.缺失的参与之声:一项来自首发精神病早期干预服务个案管理者视角的探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 24;19(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2315-0.
10
Carers' and service users' experiences of early intervention in psychosis services: implications for care partnerships.护理人员和服务使用者在精神病早期干预服务中的体验:对护理伙伴关系的启示。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;12(3):410-416. doi: 10.1111/eip.12309. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Psychological Therapy or Support Within an ARMS Psychological Therapies Trial: The Importance of Targeted Intervention for Unusual Sensory Experiences.ARMS心理治疗试验中对心理治疗或支持的偏好:针对异常感官体验的靶向干预的重要性。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;19(4):e70035. doi: 10.1111/eip.70035.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates and Predictors of Disengagement and Strength of Engagement for People With a First Episode of Psychosis Using Early Intervention Services: A Systematic Review of Predictors and Meta-analysis of Disengagement Rates.使用早期干预服务的首次发作精神病患者脱离治疗的发生率、预测因素及参与治疗的强度:预测因素的系统评价和脱离治疗发生率的荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):sgac012. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac012. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Barriers to Meaningful Participatory Mental Health Services Research and Priority Next Steps: Findings From a National Survey.参与式心理健康服务研究的障碍及下一步的优先事项:来自全国性调查的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Sep 1;74(9):902-910. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220514. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Psychosis Outside the Box: A User-Led Project to Amplify the Diversity and Richness of Experiences Described as Psychosis.超越常规的精神病学:一个由用户主导的项目,旨在放大被描述为精神病学的各种体验的多样性和丰富性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jul 1;74(7):760-763. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220488. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
Strengthening Review and Publication of Participatory Mental Health Research to Promote Empowerment and Prevent Co-optation.加强参与式心理健康研究的审查与发表,以促进赋权并防止被利用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Feb 1;74(2):166-172. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220085. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
5
A longitudinal study of headspace youth oriented mental health service satisfaction, service utilization and clinical characteristics.一项关于面向青少年的顶空气心理健康服务满意度、服务利用情况及临床特征的纵向研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;17(4):404-411. doi: 10.1111/eip.13347. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Beyond Binary Narratives of Mental Health Advocacy: Latent Profiles of Mental Health Activists and Advocates With Lived Experience.超越心理健康倡导的二元叙事:有生活经历的心理健康活动家和倡导者的潜在特征。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Feb 1;74(2):112-118. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220078. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
Pathways to Care: How Help-Seeking Behaviors Relate to Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Treatment Engagement.护理途径:求助行为与未治疗精神病持续时间及治疗参与度的关系
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Jun;93(2):473-482. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09960-5. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Shared Decision Making With Young People at Ultra High Risk of Psychotic Disorder.与处于精神病性障碍超高风险的年轻人共同决策。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 16;12:683775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.683775. eCollection 2021.
9
Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors.参与针对精神病的在线心理社会干预:相关因素的综述与综合分析
Internet Interv. 2021 Jun 5;25:100411. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100411. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Lived Experience, Research Leadership, and the Transformation of Mental Health Services: Building a Researcher Pipeline.生活体验、研究领导力以及心理健康服务的转变:建立研究人员的人才库。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 May 1;72(5):591-593. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000468. Epub 2021 Mar 11.