• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科索沃心肌梗死的管理与临床结局:一项横断面研究。

Management and clinical outcome of myocardial infarction in Kosovo: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Batalli Arlind, Henein Michael, Poniku Afrim, Ibrahimi Pranvera, Pllana-Pruthi Edita, Elezi Shpend, Shatri Faik, Abdyli Genc, Bajraktari Artan, Karahoda Rona, Selmani Hamza, Bytyçi Ibadete, Bajraktari Gani

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiology University Clinical Centre of Kosova Prishtina Kosovo.

Medical Faculty University of Prishtina Prishtina Kosovo.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;7(10):e70122. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70122. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70122
PMID:39421209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11483517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Myocardial infarction (MI) is cause of mortality worldwide, irrespective of its presentation as non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). The objective of this study was to assess national results of management and clinical outcome of acute MI patients in Kosovo.

METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted at the Clinic of Cardiology of the University Clinical Center of Kosovo, in Prishtina, included all patients hospitalized with acute MI over a period of 7 years (2014-2020). The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 7353 admitted patients with acute MI (mean age 63 ± 12 years, 29% female) and according to the final diagnosis, 4436 (59.4%) patients had STEMI, and 2987 (40.6%) NSTEMI. More patients with STEMI received primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) than those with NSTEMI (50% vs. 41%,  < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in no PPCI patients compared to PPCI both in NSTEMI (10.7% vs. 2.6%,  < 0.001) and STEMI (20.9% vs. 6.8%,  < 0.001). Age ≥65 years [0.399 (0.267-0.597),  ˂ 0.001], hemoglobin level [0.889 (0.815-0.970),  = 0.008], STEMI [0.491 (0.343-0.704),  ˂ 0.001], lack of PPCI [2.636 (1.798-3.866), p ˂ 0.001], cardiogenic shock [0.002 (0.001-0.006),  < 0.001], reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) [0.966 (0.951-0.980),  < 0.001], and heart rate at admission [1.009 (1.000-1.017),  = 0.047], independently predicted mortality. In STEMI, cardiogenic shock ( ˂ 0.001), lack of PPCI ( = 0.006), female gender ( = 0.01), and low LV EF ( = 0.04) predicted mortality but age ≥65 years ( = 0.02), female gender ( = 0.02), low LV EF ( = 0.007), and low hemoglobin ( = 0.04) predicted mortality in NSTEMI.

CONCLUSION

Between 2014 and 2020, half of patients with acute MI were not treated with PPCI, who had high mortality, particularly when presenting with STEMI. Age, cardiogenic shock, anemia, low LV EF, STEMI and no PPCI independently predicted mortality. Cardiogenic shock and lack of PPCI independently predicted mortality, only in STEMI.

摘要

背景与目的

心肌梗死(MI)是全球范围内的死亡原因,无论其表现为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)还是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。本研究的目的是评估科索沃急性心肌梗死患者的全国管理结果和临床结局。

方法

这项横断面描述性研究在普里什蒂纳的科索沃大学临床中心心脏病科进行,纳入了7年(2014 - 2020年)期间所有因急性心肌梗死住院的患者。该研究的主要结局是住院死亡率。

结果

在7353例急性心肌梗死入院患者中(平均年龄63±12岁,29%为女性),根据最终诊断,4436例(59.4%)患者为STEMI,2987例(40.6%)为NSTEMI。接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的STEMI患者比NSTEMI患者更多(50%对41%,P<0.001)。在NSTEMI和STEMI患者中,未接受PPCI的患者的住院死亡率均高于接受PPCI的患者(NSTEMI中分别为10.7%对2.6%,P<0.001;STEMI中分别为20.9%对6.8%,P<0.001)。年龄≥65岁[0.399(0.267 - 0.597),P<0.001]、血红蛋白水平[0.889(0.815 - 0.970),P = 0.008]、STEMI[0.491(0.343 - 0.704),P<0.001]、未接受PPCI[2.六千三百六十(1.798 - 3.866),P<0.001]、心源性休克[0.002(0.001 - 0.006),P<0.001]、左心室射血分数(LV EF)降低[0.966(0.951 - 0.980),P<0.001]以及入院时心率[1.009(1.000 - 1.017),P = 0.047]独立预测死亡率。在STEMI中,心源性休克(P<0.001)、未接受PPCI(P = 0.006)、女性(P = 0.01)和低LV EF(P = 0.04)预测死亡率,但在NSTEMI中,年龄≥65岁(P = 0.02)、女性(P = 0.02)、低LV EF(P = 0.007)和低血红蛋白(P = 0.04)预测死亡率。

结论

在2014年至2020年期间,一半的急性心肌梗死患者未接受PPCI治疗,这些患者死亡率高,尤其是STEMI患者。年龄、心源性休克、贫血、低LV EF、STEMI和未接受PPCI独立预测死亡率。心源性休克和未接受PPCI仅在STEMI中独立预测死亡率。

相似文献

1
Management and clinical outcome of myocardial infarction in Kosovo: A cross-sectional study.科索沃心肌梗死的管理与临床结局:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;7(10):e70122. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70122. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Smoking and Hypertriglyceridemia Predict ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kosovo Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.吸烟和高甘油三酯血症可预测科索沃急性心肌梗死患者的ST段抬高型心肌梗死。
Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 17;14(3):1149-1158. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030091.
3
Outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main-related ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.非保护左主干相关ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Mar;16(3):163-9. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000075.
4
Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR.根据心肌梗死分类的心源性休克患者的特征、治疗及预后差异:美国国家心血管数据注册(NCDR)报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):708-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000262. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial.仅罪犯病变 PCI 与心原性休克多支血管 PCI 比较的心原性休克试验中梗死相关心原性休克患者根据心电图表现的临床转归。
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1415-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.089. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Comparison of outcome in patients with ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry).接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者的预后比较(来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 15;100(2):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.083. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
7
8
Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后稳定初期不良事件的发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025572. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025572. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
Prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: The difference between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克患者的预后:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的差异。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30426. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030426.
10
Management and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data from the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理与死亡率。来自小波兰急性冠脉综合征登记处的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):115-20; discussion 121-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球心肌梗死的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03231-w.
2
Differences in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Low- and High-Income Patients in 6 Countries.6 个国家中低收入和高收入患者急性心肌梗死的治疗模式和结局差异。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 4;329(13):1088-1097. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1699.
3
The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk: A Compass for Future Health.
心血管疾病及其风险的全球负担:未来健康指南。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 20;80(25):2361-2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
4
Care of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an international analysis of quality indicators in the acute coronary syndrome STEMI Registry of the EURObservational Research Programme and ACVC and EAPCI Associations of the European Society of Cardiology in 11 462 patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的护理:对欧洲观察性研究项目急性冠状动脉综合征STEMI注册研究以及欧洲心脏病学会的ACVC和EAPCI协会中11462例患者质量指标的国际分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Jan 27;12(1):22-37. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac143.
5
Higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: Results from a global meta-analysis of 1,285,722 patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者无标准可调节风险因素时死亡率更高:来自全球 1285722 例患者的荟萃分析结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 15;371:432-440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.062. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Variation in revascularisation use and outcomes of patients in hospital with acute myocardial infarction across six high income countries: cross sectional cohort study.六个高收入国家急性心肌梗死住院患者血管重建术使用情况及治疗结果的差异:横断面队列研究
BMJ. 2022 May 4;377:e069164. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069164.
7
Examining Predictors of Myocardial Infarction.研究心肌梗死的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111284.
8
Reperfusion therapies and in-hospital outcomes for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Europe: the ACVC-EAPCI EORP STEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology.欧洲 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的再灌注治疗和院内结局:欧洲心脏病学会的 ACVC-EAPCI EORP STEMI 注册研究。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 21;42(44):4536-4549. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab342.
9
Global Differences in Burden and Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Acute Heart Failure: REPORT-HF.全球急性心力衰竭中缺血性心脏病负担和治疗的差异:REPORT-HF。
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 May;9(5):349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
10
Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Registry.急性心肌梗死住院治疗:基于人群的注册研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Nov;115(5):916-924. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190573.