McDermott Emily R, Proffitt Michael, Nuelle Clayton W, Balldin Bjorn Christian
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
Department of Orthopaedics, Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 23;6(4):100913. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100913. eCollection 2024 Aug.
To objectively assess the accuracy of socket measurements taken during cruciate ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reaming technique.
Six complete knee sawbone specimens were used to ream anterior and posterior cruciate ligament sockets in the femur and tibia in a retrograde fashion using a standard retrograde reaming device. The longest and shortest sides of the sockets were measured using a ruler. One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests were used to evaluate whether the actual measured socket length matched the estimated length set on the drill guide.
One fellowship-trained surgeon reamed 24 total sockets in sawbone specimens using guides. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the estimated measurement and the actual shortest tunnel length in each of the sockets. The median short side socket lengths were shorter than their respective intended depths by 4 mm for the femoral anterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the femoral posterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the tibial anterior cruciate ligament socket, and 4.5 mm for the tibial posterior cruciate ligament socket. All differences were significant at α = 0.05.
The estimated cruciate socket lengths reamed during ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reamer and standard intra-articular measuring instrumentation were greater than the actual measured socket lengths.
Successful cruciate ligament reconstruction relies on accurate socket measurements. This study examined the accuracy of commercially available cruciate ligament socket drill guides and the implications for clinical practice, to include graft-tunnel mismatch and surface area available for healing. Surgeons may consider reaming slightly longer than estimated sockets when performing all-inside cruciate ligament reconstructions to ensure appropriate socket depth for graft fixation.
客观评估在使用逆行扩孔技术进行交叉韧带重建过程中所进行的骨隧道测量的准确性。
使用六个完整的膝关节锯骨标本,采用标准的逆行扩孔装置以逆行方式在股骨和胫骨中扩孔,制作前交叉韧带和后交叉韧带的骨隧道。使用尺子测量骨隧道的最长边和最短边。采用单侧Wilcoxon符号秩和检验来评估实际测量的骨隧道长度是否与钻套上设定的估计长度相匹配。
一名接受过专科培训的外科医生使用钻套在锯骨标本中总共扩孔24个。统计分析显示,每个骨隧道的估计测量值与实际最短隧道长度之间存在显著差异。对于股骨前交叉韧带骨隧道,短边骨隧道长度的中位数比各自预期深度短4毫米;对于股骨后交叉韧带骨隧道,短边骨隧道长度的中位数比各自预期深度短6毫米;对于胫骨前交叉韧带骨隧道,短边骨隧道长度的中位数比各自预期深度短6毫米;对于胫骨后交叉韧带骨隧道,短边骨隧道长度的中位数比各自预期深度短4.5毫米。在α = 0.05时,所有差异均具有统计学意义。
在韧带重建过程中,使用逆行扩孔器和标准关节内测量器械扩孔时,估计的交叉韧带骨隧道长度大于实际测量的骨隧道长度。
成功的交叉韧带重建依赖于准确的骨隧道测量。本研究检验了市售交叉韧带骨隧道钻套的准确性及其对临床实践的影响,包括移植物-骨隧道不匹配以及可供愈合的表面积。在进行全关节镜下交叉韧带重建时,外科医生在扩孔时可能需要考虑比估计的骨隧道稍长一些,以确保移植物固定时有合适的骨隧道深度。