Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;69:1606912. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606912. eCollection 2024.
To discuss the opportunities and challenges of the qualitative solicited diary approach using digital technologies as an innovative way to access insights into people's lives and their unique stories in times of COVID-19-related social distancing in Switzerland.
This case study provides reflective arguments from a social science perspective for the selection of different (digital) diary designs to optimize data collection in the SNSF-funded project "PubliCo - an experimental online platform for COVID-19-related public perception."
The findings highlight some opportunities of using (digital) diaries, such as empowering participants, gathering real-time data, and ethical and methodological challenges when it comes to gaining access to alternative narratives.
To gain in-depth insights during a crisis and to reach the lesser-heard voices that are central to democratic debates, it is necessary to adapt data gathering methods and build trust with diverse communities. While digital technologies open up new possibilities for public engagement, there is a need to think critically how data gathering is approached, how trustworthy the results are, and whose voices are captured, amplified, or left out.
讨论在 COVID-19 相关社交隔离期间,使用数字技术的定性征询问日记方法作为一种创新方式来获取人们生活中的见解及其独特故事的机遇和挑战。
本案例研究从社会科学的角度提供了有关选择不同(数字)日记设计的反思性论据,以优化瑞士国家科学基金会资助的项目“PubliCo-一个用于 COVID-19 相关公众认知的实验性在线平台”中的数据收集。
研究结果强调了使用(数字)日记的一些机会,例如赋予参与者权力、实时收集数据,以及在获取替代叙事方面存在的伦理和方法学挑战。
为了在危机期间获得深入的见解并接触到民主辩论中至关重要的声音,有必要调整数据收集方法并与不同社区建立信任。虽然数字技术为公众参与开辟了新的可能性,但需要批判性地思考数据收集的方法、结果的可信度以及哪些声音被捕捉、放大或忽略。