• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邻里社会经济劣势可能会影响全髋关节置换术后1年患者报告的结局指标。

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage May Influence 1-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Benyamini Brian, Hadad Matthew J, Pasqualini Ignacio, Khan Shujaa T, Jin Yuxuan, Piuzzi Nicolas S

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):837-847. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.007
PMID:39424243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of socioeconomic status on achievement of clinically relevant patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) improvements and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unknown. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a metric that can be used as a proxy for a patient's neighborhood socioeconomic status. This study aimed to assess the association between ADI and failure to achieve: (1) clinically relevant improvements in PROMs; and (2) self-reported satisfaction at 1 year following THA.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 7,506 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA from January 2016 to July 2021 was included. The ADI was stratified into quintiles based on their distribution in our sample. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to investigate the effect of ADI on 1-year PROMs. The included PROMs were the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Pain, Physical Function Shortform (PS), and Joint Replacement (JR). Clinically relevant improvements were assessed through minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state threshold achievement.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between ADI and failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference for HOOS pain (P = 0.42), PS (P = 0.91), or JR (P = 0.20). However, higher ADI scores were independently associated with increased odds of failing to achieve patient acceptable symptom state for HOOS Pain (P = 0.002), PS (P = 0.003), and JR (P = 0.017). The ADI was not associated with failure to achieve patient satisfaction at 1 year (P = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with decreased odds of achieving clinically relevant improvement in patient-perceived symptomatic state, but not associated with patients' perception of their overall pain and function 1 year after THA. Targeted interventions to address access and care pathways for low socioeconomic status patients may present an opportunity to improve patient-perceived outcomes following THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

社会经济地位对全髋关节置换术(THA)后实现临床相关的患者报告结局指标(PROM)改善及满意度的影响尚不清楚。地区贫困指数(ADI)是一种可用于代表患者社区社会经济地位的指标。本研究旨在评估ADI与未能实现以下两点之间的关联:(1)PROM的临床相关改善;(2)THA术后1年的自我报告满意度。

方法

纳入2016年1月至2021年7月期间接受初次单侧THA的7506例患者的前瞻性队列。根据ADI在我们样本中的分布将其分为五等份。建立多变量逻辑回归模型以研究ADI对1年PROM的影响。纳入的PROM包括髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)疼痛、身体功能简表(PS)和关节置换(JR)。通过最小临床重要差异和达到患者可接受症状状态阈值来评估临床相关改善情况。

结果

ADI与未能达到HOOS疼痛(P = 0.42)、PS(P = 0.91)或JR(P = 0.20)的最小临床重要差异之间无显著关联。然而,较高的ADI评分与未能达到HOOS疼痛(P = 0.002)、PS(P = 0.003)和JR(P = 0.017)的患者可接受症状状态的几率增加独立相关。ADI与1年时未达到患者满意度无关(P = 0.93)。

结论

社区社会经济劣势越大,患者自我感知症状状态实现临床相关改善的几率越低,但与THA术后1年患者对其总体疼痛和功能的感知无关。针对低社会经济地位患者的获取途径和护理路径的针对性干预措施可能为改善THA术后患者自我感知结局提供机会。

证据水平

三级。

相似文献

1
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage May Influence 1-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty.邻里社会经济劣势可能会影响全髋关节置换术后1年患者报告的结局指标。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):837-847. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
High Area Deprivation Index is Associated With Not Achieving the Patient-acceptable Symptom State After TKA.高区域剥夺指数与全膝关节置换术后未达到患者可接受的症状状态相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1428-1438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003040. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Establishing minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds following birmingham hip resurfacing.建立 Birmingham 髋关节表面置换术后的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态阈值。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3729-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05443-x. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后髋关节障碍和骨关节炎结果评分中最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的诊断特异性阈值是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1783-1788.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Does Implant Selection Affect Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后植入物的选择会影响患者报告的结局指标吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 15;103(24):2306-2317. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01931.
7
Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.比较在退伍军人事务部医院接受择期全髋关节或全膝关节置换术的退伍军人患者报告的结局测量中确定最小临床重要差异的方法。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):404-411. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024.
8
Relationship Between Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy.髋关节镜术后邻里社会经济地位与功能结局的关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Oct;52(12):3054-3064. doi: 10.1177/03635465241272077. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
9
Does Your Patient Need to Lose Weight? Weight Change Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty Does Not Affect Health Care Utilization and Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference.你的患者需要减肥吗?全髋关节置换术前和术后的体重变化并不影响医疗保健的利用和达到最小临床重要差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jun;39(6):1404-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.051. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
10
Who Benefits From Hip Arthroplasty or Knee Arthroplasty? Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Thresholds Predict Meaningful Improvement.哪些人能从髋关节置换术或膝关节置换术中获益?术前患者报告的结局阈值可预测有意义的改善。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 May 1;482(5):867-881. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002994. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
CORR Insights®: Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?CORR见解®:对侧全髋关节置换术间隔超过1年:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗保健利用情况是否不同?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):843-845. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003388. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
The Oxford hip score demonstrates moderate ceiling effects at one and two years after total hip arthroplasty: which patients are at risk and does it matter?牛津髋关节评分在全髋关节置换术后1年和2年显示出中度天花板效应:哪些患者有风险,这有关系吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jan 11;35(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04155-7.