• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业学生对混合式学习满意度的影响因素

Determinants of nursing students' satisfaction with blended learning.

作者信息

Hassan Eman Arafa, Mohamed Ahlam Mahmoud, Eltaib Fatma Abdou, Khaled Asmaa Mohammed Saad

机构信息

Critical Care and Emergency Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02393-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02393-y
PMID:39425189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11488250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blended learning, a pedagogical approach combining traditional classroom instruction with online components, has gained prominence in nursing education. While offering numerous benefits, student satisfaction with blended learning remains a critical concern. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation of the determinants influencing nursing students' satisfaction with this innovative educational modality. By examining a wide range of factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, academic factors, and environmental influences, this research offers valuable insights for educators to optimize blended learning experiences in nursing education.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional research design was conducted. This study investigates the factors influencing nursing students' satisfaction with blended learning at Alexandria University, Egypt, where blended learning programs have been integrated into the curriculum primarily through the Microsoft Teams platform. A convenient sample of 1266 nursing students from both bachelor and technical educational institutions participated in the study from September 2023 to the end of December 2023. Data were collected using an online survey containing two measurement tools: the Blended Learning Satisfaction Scale and the Environmental Facilitators and Barriers to Student Persistence in Online Courses scale. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics and backward multiple linear regression, were conducted to identify factors that are associated with the satisfaction of nursing students' with blended learning.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that factors such as age, gender, income, employment status, access to suitable internet sources, academic year, computer literacy, preferred learning method, and perceptions of environmental facilitators significantly influence satisfaction scores (all p < 0.001). The overall regression model, with an adjusted R² of 0.31, signifies that 31% of the variance in satisfaction scores is explained collectively by the previously mentioned variables (F = 21.21, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Students' sociodemographic variables, preference for blended learning, and perception of environmental facilitators such as encouragement to enroll in the course significantly influence nursing students' satisfaction levels with blended learning. However, limitations in the current study such as self-report bias, convenient sampling, and cross-sectional design limit the generalizability and causal inferences of these findings.

摘要

背景

混合式学习作为一种将传统课堂教学与在线教学相结合的教学方法,在护理教育中日益受到重视。虽然混合式学习带来了诸多益处,但学生对其满意度仍是一个关键问题。本研究通过全面评估影响护理专业学生对这种创新教育模式满意度的决定因素,为现有文献做出了贡献。通过考察广泛的因素,包括社会人口学特征、学术因素和环境影响,本研究为教育工作者优化护理教育中的混合式学习体验提供了有价值的见解。

方法

采用描述性横断面研究设计。本研究调查了埃及亚历山大大学护理专业学生对混合式学习满意度的影响因素,该校的混合式学习课程主要通过微软团队平台融入课程体系。2023年9月至12月底,来自本科和技术教育机构的1266名护理专业学生组成的便利样本参与了本研究。数据通过在线调查收集,该调查包含两种测量工具:混合式学习满意度量表和在线课程中影响学生坚持学习的环境促进因素与障碍量表。进行了包括描述性统计和向后多元线性回归在内的统计分析,以确定与护理专业学生混合式学习满意度相关的因素。

结果

研究结果表明,年龄、性别、收入、就业状况、是否能获取合适的互联网资源、学年、计算机素养、偏好的学习方式以及对环境促进因素的认知等因素对满意度得分有显著影响(所有p < 0.001)。调整后的R²为0.31的总体回归模型表明,满意度得分差异的31%可由上述变量共同解释(F = 21.21,p < 0.001)。

结论

学生的社会人口学变量、对混合式学习的偏好以及对诸如鼓励参加课程等环境促进因素的认知,显著影响护理专业学生对混合式学习的满意度水平。然而,本研究存在自我报告偏差、便利抽样和横断面设计等局限性,限制了这些结果的普遍性和因果推断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/0828a6fb1cc8/12912_2024_2393_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/5798105aa4e5/12912_2024_2393_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/c1eb24560801/12912_2024_2393_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/a63c5b51b692/12912_2024_2393_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/0828a6fb1cc8/12912_2024_2393_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/5798105aa4e5/12912_2024_2393_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/c1eb24560801/12912_2024_2393_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/a63c5b51b692/12912_2024_2393_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e42/11488250/0828a6fb1cc8/12912_2024_2393_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Determinants of nursing students' satisfaction with blended learning.护理专业学生对混合式学习满意度的影响因素
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02393-y.
2
Comparison of blended versus traditional classrooms among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.本科护生混合式教学与传统课堂教学比较的准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
3
Design and practice of blended teaching of internal medicine nursing based on O-AMAS effective teaching model.基于 O-AMAS 有效教学模式的内科护理学混合式教学的设计与实践。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05588-8.
4
Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China.影响中国高等教育学生对混合式学习教学模式学习满意度的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1193675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193675. eCollection 2023.
5
Perception, satisfaction, and self-regulation in a blended learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic among health sciences students: A cross-sectional survey.新冠疫情期间健康科学专业学生在混合学习环境中的感知、满意度和自我调节:一项横断面调查。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:312. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1739_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Nursing Undergraduate Students' Experiences and Perceptions of Blended Learning in Pediatric Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study.护理本科生对儿科护理混合式学习的体验与认知:一项混合方法研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 10;10:23779608241274214. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274214. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Implementation of a Student-Teacher-Based Blended Curriculum for the Training of Medical Students for Nasopharyngeal Swab and Intramuscular Injection: Mixed Methods Pre-Post and Satisfaction Surveys.基于师生的混合式课程在医学生鼻咽拭子采集和肌内注射培训中的实施:混合方法前后测及满意度调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Mar 2;9:e38870. doi: 10.2196/38870.
8
Blended learning: Assessing nursing students' perspectives.混合式学习:评估护理学生的观点。
Curationis. 2024 Jul 5;47(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2579.
9
Factors associated with learning outcome of BSN in a blended learning environment.混合学习环境中与护理学学士学习成果相关的因素。
Contemp Nurse. 2011 Apr-Jun;38(1-2):24-34. doi: 10.5172/conu.2011.38.1-2.24.
10
Satisfaction and continuance intention of blended learning from perspective of junior high school students in the directly-entering-socialism ethnic communities of China.中国直过民族地区初中生对混合学习的满意度和持续意向。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0270939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270939. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring deep learning in third-year undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods study.探索本科三年级护理专业学生的深度学习:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 5;24(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03303-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Expectations and concerns about transitioning to face-to-face learning among Korean nursing students: A mixed methods study.韩国护理专业学生对过渡到面对面学习的期望和担忧:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 18;19(1):e0296914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296914. eCollection 2024.
2
The experiences of health sciences students with hybrid learning in health sciences education-A qualitative study.健康科学专业学生混合学习健康科学教育的体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jan;132:106017. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106017. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
3
Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills, critical thinking ability and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
混合式学习对本科护生知识、技能、批判性思维能力和心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103786. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103786. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Student satisfaction and academic efficacy during online learning with the mediating effect of student engagement: A multi-country study.学生满意度和在线学习中的学业效能感:一项多国研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0285315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285315. eCollection 2023.
5
Chinese anatomy educators' perceptions of blended learning in anatomy education: A national survey in the post-COVID-19 era.中文解剖学教育者对解剖学教育中混合式学习的看法:后 COVID-19 时代的全国性调查。
Anat Sci Educ. 2024 Jan-Feb;17(1):77-87. doi: 10.1002/ase.2328. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China.影响中国高等教育学生对混合式学习教学模式学习满意度的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1193675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193675. eCollection 2023.
7
Developing a personalised, evidence-based and inclusive learning (PEBIL) model of blended learning: A cross-sectional survey.开发一种个性化、基于证据且具有包容性的混合式学习(PEBIL)模式:一项横断面调查。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Apr 4:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11770-0.
8
A study of the effects of blended learning on university students' critical thinking: A systematic review.混合式学习对大学生批判性思维影响的研究:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:95. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_665_22. eCollection 2023.
9
Predictors of nursing student satisfaction as a key quality indicator of tertiary students' education experience: An integrative review.护理专业学生满意度的预测因素作为高等教育学生体验质量的关键指标:综合评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jul;126:105806. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105806. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
10
An international exploration of blended learning use in pre-registration nursing and midwifery education.国际上对注册护士和助产士教育中混合式学习的应用的探索。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103514. Epub 2022 Nov 24.