Meneguzzo Paolo, Todisco Patrizia
Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Eat Disord. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01129-2.
Body uneasiness is a central facet of body image disturbances observed in individuals with eating disorders (EDs). This study aimed to address gaps in understanding body uneasiness in severe and enduring eating disorders (SE-EDs) and explore variations in psychopathology between individuals with different durations of the disorder. We hypothesized that patients with SE-ED might develop habitual behaviors that contribute to ambivalence toward treatment and the persistence of symptoms.
A sample of 360 ED patients was evaluated at the beginning and end of a specialized intensive rehabilitation program. All patients completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT). They were divided into two groups: SE-ED (> 7 years) and acute (aED, < 3 years) duration.
Compulsive self-monitoring showed a significant change between the start and end of treatment, differing between groups, with a larger change observed in SE-ED (p < 0.048). In SE-ED, it was associated with lower chances of dropout (p = 0.044), opposite to aED (p = 0.009). Treatment responses were primarily related to eating psychopathology, further highlighting differences between the two groups.
This study underscores the possible presence of a habit in SE-ED and the importance of tailoring interventions to address unique needs based on the duration of the disorder. Furthermore, it highlights the need for further research to improve treatment outcomes in SE-EDs.
身体不适感是进食障碍(ED)患者所出现的身体意象障碍的一个核心方面。本研究旨在填补在理解严重且持久的进食障碍(SE-ED)中的身体不适感方面的空白,并探讨不同病程的个体之间精神病理学的差异。我们假设患有SE-ED的患者可能会形成习惯性行为,这会导致对治疗的矛盾心理以及症状的持续存在。
对360名进食障碍患者在一个专门的强化康复项目开始和结束时进行评估。所有患者都完成了进食障碍检查问卷(EDE-Q)和身体不适感测试(BUT)。他们被分为两组:病程超过7年的SE-ED组和病程小于3年的急性(aED)组。
强迫性自我监测在治疗开始和结束之间显示出显著变化,两组之间存在差异,在SE-ED组中观察到的变化更大(p < 0.048)。在SE-ED组中,它与较低的退出几率相关(p = 0.044),这与aED组相反(p = 0.009)。治疗反应主要与进食精神病理学相关,进一步凸显了两组之间的差异。
本研究强调了SE-ED中可能存在的一种习惯,以及根据病程长短量身定制干预措施以满足独特需求的重要性。此外,它还强调了需要进一步研究以改善SE-ED的治疗效果。