Finkelstein Lauren B, Bright Emma E, Gu Heng Chao J, Arch Joanna J
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae064.
Self-affirmation theory (SAT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) embody competing approaches to leveraging personal values to motivate behavior change but are rarely compared in the domain of health behavior. This study compares these theory-driven values-based interventions for promoting medication adherence.
To compare affective and behavioral responses to competing values-based medication adherence interventions.
In this three-armed randomized trial, participants with cancer (n = 95) or diabetes (n = 97) recruited online using Prolific and prescribed daily oral medication for that disease completed a one-session online writing intervention leveraging (1) a domain incongruent (DI) value, where the value was not connected to medication adherence; (2) a domain congruent (DC) value, where the value was connected to adherence; or (3) a control condition, focused on medication adherence procedures.
There were no main effects of conditions on reported medication adherence at the 1-month follow-up. During the intervention, positive affect was higher in the values conditions than control (p < .001), and trended higher in DI versus DC (p = .054). Negative affect did not vary between the values and control groups (p = .093) but was lower in DI versus DC (p = .006). Improvements in positive affect over the course of the intervention were associated with increased adherence behavior for individuals who started with low levels of positive affect (p = .003). Disease type did not moderate findings.
Consistent with SAT, focusing on DI values led to more positive and less negative affect than connecting values directly to behavior in a threatening domain such as chronic illness. For some participants, increases in positive affect predicted greater adherence.
自我肯定理论(SAT)和接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)体现了利用个人价值观来促进行为改变的两种相互竞争的方法,但在健康行为领域很少被比较。本研究比较了这些基于理论驱动的、以价值观为基础的干预措施对促进药物依从性的效果。
比较对相互竞争的基于价值观的药物依从性干预措施的情感和行为反应。
在这项三臂随机试验中,通过Prolific在线招募的患有癌症(n = 95)或糖尿病(n = 97)且正在服用该疾病每日口服药物的参与者完成了一项单节在线写作干预,该干预利用(1)一个领域不一致(DI)价值观,即该价值观与药物依从性无关;(2)一个领域一致(DC)价值观,表示该价值观与依从性相关;或(3)一个对照条件,重点是药物依从性程序。
在1个月的随访中,各条件对报告的药物依从性没有主要影响。在干预期间,价值观条件组的积极情绪高于对照组(p < .001),并且DI组相对于DC组有更高的趋势(p = .054)。消极情绪在价值观组和对照组之间没有差异(p = .093),但DI组低于DC组(p = .006)。对于开始时积极情绪水平较低的个体,干预过程中积极情绪的改善与依从行为的增加相关(p = .003)。疾病类型并未调节研究结果。
与自我肯定理论一致,与在诸如慢性病等具有威胁性的领域中将价值观直接与行为联系起来相比,关注DI价值观会带来更多的积极情绪和更少的消极情绪。对于一些参与者来说,积极情绪的增加预示着更高的依从性。