• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新颖的学术研究者同行支持方法。

A novel approach to peer support for academic researchers.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TX, UK.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.

出版信息

Occup Med (Lond). 2024 Nov 28;74(8):601-606. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqae091.

DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqae091
PMID:39425907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11604121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic researchers experience high levels of stress, isolation and loneliness, which compromise their well-being. There is a particular need to address these issues amongst early career and postgraduate research staff. 'Spaces for Listening' is an initiative to increase active listening and provide peer support.

AIMS

To assess the feasibility, acceptability and potential impacts of Spaces for Listening in an academic setting.

METHODS

Early career and postgraduate researchers from a large university in the UK were invited to attend 'Academic Spaces for Listening' (ASfL). Five ASfL sessions (including in-person and Chinese language) were held. A mixed-methods study using online survey and in-depth interviews was conducted. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using principles of thematic analysis. The qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated at the interpretation phase.

RESULTS

A total of 25 participants attended an ASfL session, 22 of them completed the survey and 6 participants participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants were very satisfied with the session content (68%, n = 15), organization (68%, n = 15) and delivery (68%, n = 15). Four themes were identified from qualitative analysis: (i) the 'Academic Spaces for Listening' (ASfL) experience; (2) impact of ASfL; (3) potential challenges of ASfL and (4) ASfL in the future. Interpersonal connectedness was an important outcome for participants during the session. Participants showed interest in the future of ASfL.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing Spaces for Listening in an academic setting is feasible and was well received by participants. The initiative may fill a gap in the social interactions amongst academic researchers.

摘要

背景

学术研究人员承受着高强度的压力、孤立和孤独,这影响了他们的健康。尤其是对于早期职业和研究生研究人员来说,解决这些问题尤为重要。“倾听空间”是一项旨在增加积极倾听和提供同伴支持的倡议。

目的

评估“倾听空间”在学术环境中的可行性、可接受性和潜在影响。

方法

邀请英国一所大型大学的早期职业和研究生研究人员参加“学术倾听空间”(ASfL)。共举办了五次 ASfL 会议(包括现场和中文)。采用在线调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。使用描述性统计分析对定量数据进行分析,使用主题分析原则对定性数据进行分析。在解释阶段,将定性和定量结果进行了整合。

结果

共有 25 名参与者参加了一次 ASfL 会议,其中 22 名完成了调查,6 名参与者参加了半结构化访谈。参与者对会议内容(68%,n=15)、组织(68%,n=15)和实施(68%,n=15)非常满意。定性分析中确定了四个主题:(i)“学术倾听空间”(ASfL)体验;(2)ASfL 的影响;(3)ASfL 的潜在挑战和(4)未来的 ASfL。在会议期间,参与者之间的人际联系是一个重要的结果。参与者对 ASfL 的未来表现出兴趣。

结论

在学术环境中实施“倾听空间”是可行的,并且受到参与者的欢迎。该倡议可能填补了学术研究人员之间社交互动的空白。

相似文献

1
A novel approach to peer support for academic researchers.一种新颖的学术研究者同行支持方法。
Occup Med (Lond). 2024 Nov 28;74(8):601-606. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqae091.
2
Craftwell: a feasibility and acceptability study of outdoor heritage crafting for wellbeing and mental health.Craftwell:一项关于户外传统手工艺促进身心健康和心理健康的可行性与可接受性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1556230. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556230. eCollection 2025.
3
The challenges of lockdown for early-career researchers.封锁对初出茅庐的研究人员的挑战。
Elife. 2020 Jun 12;9:e59634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59634.
4
Improving the integration of care for trans adults: ICTA a mixed-methods study.改善跨性别成人的护理整合:ICTA 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(28):1-217. doi: 10.3310/EWTA4502.
5
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
6
Understanding and using experiences of social care to guide service improvements: translating a co-design approach from health to social care.理解和利用社会关怀经验指导服务改进:将共同设计方法从卫生领域转化到社会关怀领域。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(27):1-84. doi: 10.3310/MYHT8970.
7
A peer intervention reduces loneliness and improves social well-being in low-income older adults: A mixed-methods study.同伴干预可减少低收入老年人的孤独感并改善其社会幸福感:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3365-3376. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17450. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
8
Understanding and supporting the mental health and professional quality of life of academic mental health researchers: results from a cross-sectional survey.了解并支持学术性心理健康研究人员的心理健康和职业生活质量:横断面调查结果
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21823-3.
9
Enriching qualitative alcohol and other drug research by engaging lived experience peer researchers in a dual-interview approach: A case study.通过让有切身体验的同行研究人员参与双重访谈方法来丰富定性酒精和其他药物研究:一个案例研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 Jul;43(5):1040-1044. doi: 10.1111/dar.13724. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Reentry During A Pandemic: A Pilot Study of Access to Peer Support Through Technology to Reduce Social Isolation.疫情期间的重新融入:一项关于通过技术获得同伴支持以减少社会隔离的试点研究。
Am J Crim Justice. 2022 Sep 21:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s12103-022-09690-9.
2
Scoping review to evaluate the effects of peer support on the mental health of young adults.范围综述评估同伴支持对青年心理健康的影响。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061336.
3
Supporting mental health and wellbeing of university and college students: A systematic review of review-level evidence of interventions.支持大学生的心理健康和幸福感:干预措施的综述级证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0266725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266725. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of working in academia on researchers' mental health and well-being: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.工作对研究者心理健康和福祉的影响:系统评价和定性元综合。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268890. eCollection 2022.
5
The challenges of COVID-19 for the well-being of academic staff.新冠疫情给学术人员福祉带来的挑战。
Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 13;72(1):2-3. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqab007.
6
A peer support and peer mentoring approach to enhancing resilience and empowerment among refugees settled in southern Spain.一种同伴支持和同伴指导的方法,用于增强在西班牙南部定居的难民的适应力和赋权感。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Jul;48(5):1438-1451. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22338. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Development of a theory-based, peer support intervention to promote weight loss among Latina immigrants.开发一种基于理论的同伴支持干预措施,以促进拉丁裔移民的体重减轻。
BMC Obes. 2015 Mar 19;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40608-015-0047-3. eCollection 2015.
8
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.