Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, England.
Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2024 Dec;58(1):2418086. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2024.2418086. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
Using a systematic meta-analysis, we investigated if patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with varying baseline blood pressure (BP) differ in the cardiorenal benefits received from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). Randomized, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. The differential treatment effect by baseline BP category within each trial was estimated as the ratio of the HR (RHR) and pooled. Seventeen publications based on 9 unique CVOTs (4 SGLT-2is and 5 GLP-1RAs) were eligible. In participants with normal baseline BP, comparing SGLT-2is with placebo, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.88 (0.79-0.97) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 0.73 (0.59-0.91) for heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 0.78 (0.65-0.94) for composite CVD death/HF hospitalization, and 0.55 (0.41-0.73) for composite renal outcome. The corresponding estimates for participants with higher baseline BP were 0.88 (0.81-0.96), 0.67 (0.57-0.79), 0.73 (0.65-0.82), and 0.61 (0.48-0.77), respectively. In participants with normal baseline BP, GLP-RAs had no strong effect on MACE, stroke and nephropathy, but reduced stroke and nephropathy risk in those with higher baseline BP. Estimated RHRs showed no statistical evidence that baseline BP modified the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. In patients with T2D, the cardiorenal benefits of treatment with SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs were similar in patients with normal baseline BP compared to those with a higher baseline BP.
采用系统荟萃分析,我们研究了基线血压(BP)不同的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者从钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT-2i)和胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)中获得的心脏肾脏获益是否存在差异。从 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索到 SGLT-2i 和 GLP-1RA 的随机、安慰剂对照心血管结局试验(CVOT),截至 2024 年 4 月。汇总了风险比(HRs)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。通过对每个试验中基线 BP 类别内的差异治疗效果进行估计,得到比值比(RHR)和汇总。基于 9 项独特 CVOT 的 17 篇文献(4 项 SGLT-2i 和 5 项 GLP-1RA)符合条件。在基线 BP 正常的参与者中,与安慰剂相比,SGLT-2i 的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的 HR(95%CI)分别为 0.88(0.79-0.97)、心力衰竭(HF)住院的 HR(95%CI)为 0.73(0.59-0.91)、复合 CVD 死亡/HF 住院的 HR(95%CI)为 0.78(0.65-0.94),以及复合肾脏结局的 HR(95%CI)为 0.55(0.41-0.73)。基线 BP 较高的参与者的相应估计值分别为 0.88(0.81-0.96)、0.67(0.57-0.79)、0.73(0.65-0.82)和 0.61(0.48-0.77)。在基线 BP 正常的参与者中,GLP-RA 对 MACE、中风和肾病无明显作用,但在基线 BP 较高的参与者中降低了中风和肾病的风险。估计的 RHR 并未显示出统计学证据表明基线 BP 改变了 SGLT-2i 和 GLP-1RA 的心脏肾脏获益。在 T2D 患者中,与基线 BP 较高的患者相比,基线 BP 正常的患者使用 SGLT2-Is 和 GLP1-RAs 的心脏肾脏获益相似。