Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:489-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.068. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
Trauma patients return to the emergency department (ED) at alarmingly high rates, despite not all patients requiring hospital resources. Reasons for ED re-presentation and associated risk factors have not been fully investigated.
Retrospective cohort study of adult trauma admissions at an urban safety net level 1 trauma center (1/12018-12/312021). Risk factors for ED re-presentation were identified using purposeful selection and modeled using multivariable logistic regression.
Of 2491 patients, 19% returned within 30 d (N = 475). Most patients presented for uncontrolled pain (37%, N = 175), medical concerns (25%, N = 119), and infection (10%, N = 49). The readmission rates varied as follows: 18% for uncontrolled pain (N = 32), 42% for medical concerns (N = 50), and 67% for infection (N = 33). Risk factors for uncontrolled pain included depression/anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.05), substance use disorder (SUD) (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.43), and penetrating mechanism of injury (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.59-3.18). Risk factors for medical concerns included number of medical comorbidities (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), depression/anxiety (aOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.28-3.01), SUD (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.65-3.74), and nonhome discharge disposition (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.07-2.28). Risk factors for infection included non-English primary language (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 1.82-6.39), SUD (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03-3.88), and nonhome discharge disposition (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.15-3.67).
Uncontrolled pain was the most common reason for re-presentation, although only a small fraction required readmission. Patients with penetrating injury may benefit from improved pain control. Primary care provider follow-up may help mitigate risk of medical disease exacerbation, and wound care instructions for non-English speaking patients may decrease re-presentation for infection.
尽管并非所有患者都需要医院资源,但创伤患者返回急诊科(ED)的比例高得惊人。ED 再次就诊的原因和相关危险因素尚未得到充分研究。
对城市安全网 1 级创伤中心(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)的成年创伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用有针对性的选择确定 ED 再次就诊的危险因素,并使用多变量逻辑回归进行建模。
在 2491 名患者中,19%(N=475)在 30 天内再次就诊。大多数患者因疼痛控制不佳(37%,N=175)、医疗问题(25%,N=119)和感染(10%,N=49)就诊。再入院率如下:疼痛控制不佳(N=32)为 18%,医疗问题(N=50)为 42%,感染(N=33)为 67%。疼痛控制不佳的危险因素包括抑郁/焦虑(调整后的优势比 [aOR] 2.06,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.39-3.05)、物质使用障碍(SUD)(aOR 1.65,95% CI 1.12-2.43)和穿透性损伤机制(aOR 2.25,95% CI 1.59-3.18)。医疗问题的危险因素包括合并症数量(aOR 1.34,95% CI 1.18-1.52)、抑郁/焦虑(aOR 1.97,95% CI 1.28-3.01)、SUD(aOR 2.48,95% CI 1.65-3.74)和非家庭出院处置(aOR 1.56,95% CI 1.07-2.28)。感染的危险因素包括非英语母语(aOR 3.41,95% CI 1.82-6.39)、SUD(aOR 2.00,95% CI 1.03-3.88)和非家庭出院处置(aOR 2.06,95% CI 1.15-3.67)。
疼痛控制不佳是再次就诊的最常见原因,但只有一小部分患者需要再次入院。穿透性损伤患者可能受益于更好的疼痛控制。初级保健提供者的随访可能有助于减轻医疗疾病恶化的风险,而对非英语患者进行伤口护理指导可能会降低感染再次就诊的风险。