Mal H, Rouby J J, Benhamou D, Viars P
Br J Anaesth. 1986 Jan;58(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.1.18.
Seven hypoxaemic patients with acute respiratory failure were ventilated with HFJV (Ventilator VS 600). Arterial oxygenation was improved in each patient by the increases induced in mean airway pressure (PAW) (to 20 cm H2O) using three different ventilatory settings applied in a random order: technique A: I:E ratio 0.43, driving pressure 2.9 bar, no PEEP; technique B: I:E ratio 1.0, driving pressure 1.9 bar, no PEEP; technique C: I:E ratio 0.43, driving pressure 1.8 bar, PEEP 11 cm H2O. Respiratory frequency was maintained at 250 b.p.m. throughout the study. There were no significant differences in PaO2 (FlO2 = 1) or Qs/Qt between the three techniques. In contrast, carbon dioxide elimination was markedly affected by the method used to increase PAW:PaCO2 was significantly higher during technique C (8.5 +/- 3.6 kPa) and technique B (6.6 +/- 2.1 kPa) than during technique A (4.8 +/- 0.9 kPa). Significant increases in cardiac index, heartrate, mean pulmonary arterial pressure and a decrease in the arterio-venous oxygen content difference were observed when PaCO2 increased. We conclude that, to obtain the PAW necessary to improve pulmonary oxygen exchange, more effective carbon dioxide elimination is achieved by increasing the driving pressure, rather than by increasing the I:E ratio, or using a PEEP valve.
七名急性呼吸衰竭的低氧血症患者接受了高频喷射通气(Ventilator VS 600)。通过以随机顺序应用三种不同的通气设置,使平均气道压力(PAW)增加至20 cm H2O,每位患者的动脉氧合得到改善:技术A:吸呼比0.43,驱动压力2.9 bar,无呼气末正压(PEEP);技术B:吸呼比1.0,驱动压力1.9 bar,无PEEP;技术C:吸呼比0.43,驱动压力1.8 bar,PEEP 11 cm H2O。在整个研究过程中,呼吸频率维持在250次/分钟。三种技术之间的动脉血氧分压(PaO2,吸入氧分数(FlO2)= 1)或肺内分流率(Qs/Qt)无显著差异。相比之下,用于增加PAW的方法对二氧化碳清除有显著影响:技术C(8.5 +/- 3.6 kPa)和技术B(6.6 +/- 2.1 kPa)期间的动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)显著高于技术A(4.8 +/- 0.9 kPa)。当PaCO2升高时,观察到心脏指数、心率、平均肺动脉压显著增加,动静脉血氧含量差减小。我们得出结论,为了获得改善肺氧交换所需的PAW,通过增加驱动压力比增加吸呼比或使用PEEP阀能更有效地清除二氧化碳。