Boktor Joseph, Trivedi Rishi, Alshahwani Awf A, Joseph Vinay, Ashry Ahmed, Lewis Peter
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cardiff University Hospital, Cardiff, GBR.
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 18;16(9):e69665. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69665. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Background Surgical tray rationalization involves minimizing surgical equipment to reduce operating theater expenses. This study aims to assess whether rationalization of surgical trays is possible in a staged bilateral total hip or total knee replacement by utilizing the first surgical tray as a reference. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted of a consecutive cohort of staged bilateral lower limb arthroplasties from August 2009 to February 2020. The staged procedures were performed by the same surgeon using the same technique and the same implant system between the sides. Results A total of 442 out of 511 consecutive staged lower limb arthroplasties were included. For bilateral total knee replacements (BTKRs), 146 joints were operated on in 73 patients. The mean interval between sides was 28 months. Overall, 72/73 (98.6%) patients had both tibial and femoral components that were within one size of the first side operated on. For bilateral total hip replacements (BTHRs), 296 joints were operated on in 148 patients. The time interval between sides was 24 months. Overall, 140/148 (94.6%) patients had an acetabular cup size that was within a one-size difference between the first and second-side surgery. Regarding differences in femoral stem sizes, 130/148 (87.8%) had an implant that was again within a one-size difference between the first and second-side surgery. Our results demonstrated that the rationalization of surgical trays can be adopted for patients who have implants that are within one size of the first side operated on in both BTKRs and BTHRs. This has the potential to reduce costs by £159.81 and £151.26 per case, respectively. Conclusions This cohort study confirms implant sizes used for first-side surgery are a reliable predictor for those used in second-side surgery in staged bilateral lower limb arthroplasty. Used in conjunction with preoperative templating, the surgical team can confidently rationalize surgical trays, thereby improving theater efficiency and decreasing sterilization costs.
背景 手术托盘合理化涉及尽量减少手术设备以降低手术室费用。本研究旨在评估在分期双侧全髋关节或全膝关节置换术中,以第一个手术托盘为参考,手术托盘合理化是否可行。方法 对2009年8月至2020年2月连续进行的分期双侧下肢关节成形术队列进行回顾性分析。分期手术由同一位外科医生进行,两侧采用相同的技术和相同的植入系统。结果 511例连续分期下肢关节成形术中,共纳入442例。对于双侧全膝关节置换术(BTKR),73例患者的146个关节接受了手术。两侧手术的平均间隔时间为28个月。总体而言,72/73(98.6%)患者的胫骨和股骨组件尺寸与首次手术侧相差不超过一个尺寸。对于双侧全髋关节置换术(BTHR),148例患者的296个关节接受了手术。两侧手术的时间间隔为24个月。总体而言,140/148(94.6%)患者的髋臼杯尺寸在首次和第二次手术侧之间相差不超过一个尺寸。关于股骨柄尺寸的差异,130/148(87.8%)患者的植入物在首次和第二次手术侧之间的尺寸差异也不超过一个尺寸。我们的结果表明,对于BTKR和BTHR中植入物尺寸与首次手术侧相差不超过一个尺寸的患者,可以采用手术托盘合理化。这有可能分别使每例手术成本降低159.81英镑和151.26英镑。结论 这项队列研究证实,分期双侧下肢关节成形术中首次手术使用的植入物尺寸是第二次手术所用植入物尺寸的可靠预测指标。结合术前模板,手术团队可以自信地使手术托盘合理化,从而提高手术室效率并降低消毒成本。