Sinha Tanya, Gul Ushna, Babar Nawabzada Nadir, Israr Farhan, Butt Aqsa A, Chaudhari Sandipkumar S, Maqbool Hamza, Amin Adil
Internal Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, NPL.
Internal Medicine, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 19;16(9):e69711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69711. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, prompting research into treatments that can mitigate this risk. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, particularly dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have shown promising cardiovascular benefits in T2DM patients. This meta-analysis aimed to directly compare the cardiovascular outcomes of these two drugs. To achieve this, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases up to August 5, 2024, including both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The primary outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed several key findings. Notably, dapagliflozin demonstrated superior efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation compared to empagliflozin. However, no significant differences were observed between the two drugs in terms of MACE, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), or myocardial infarction. When compared to placebo, both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin showed greater effectiveness in preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM patients. These results reinforce the cardiovascular benefits of both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with T2DM. The comparable efficacy in most outcomes suggests that clinicians have flexibility in prescribing either of these SGLT2 inhibitors. However, the lower risk of atrial fibrillation associated with dapagliflozin may be a crucial factor in treatment decisions, especially for patients with a history of or at high risk for atrial fibrillation.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)是心血管疾病的一个重要风险因素,这促使人们对能够降低这种风险的治疗方法进行研究。钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂,特别是达格列净和恩格列净,已在T2DM患者中显示出有前景的心血管益处。这项荟萃分析旨在直接比较这两种药物的心血管结局。为实现这一目标,我们在截至2024年8月5日的多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。感兴趣的主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心房颤动(AF)、心血管死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和因心力衰竭住院(HF)。十二项研究符合这项荟萃分析的纳入标准。汇总分析揭示了几个关键发现。值得注意的是,与恩格列净相比,达格列净在预防心房颤动方面显示出更高的疗效。然而,在MACE、心血管死亡率、因心力衰竭住院(HHF)或心肌梗死方面,两种药物之间未观察到显著差异。与安慰剂相比,达格列净和恩格列净在预防T2DM患者不良心血管结局方面均显示出更高的有效性。这些结果强化了达格列净和恩格列净对T2DM患者的心血管益处。在大多数结局方面的疗效相当表明,临床医生在开具这两种SGLT2抑制剂中的任何一种时都具有灵活性。然而,与达格列净相关的心房颤动风险较低可能是治疗决策中的一个关键因素,特别是对于有心房颤动病史或心房颤动高风险的患者。